Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Institute for Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Jan;70(1):157-161. doi: 10.1002/acr.23238.
To assess the diagnostic performance of a comprehensive set of tests and measures to discriminate patellofemoral (PF) from tibiofemoral (TF) osteoarthritis (OA).
The Clinical Assessment of the Knee Study is a study of knee pain in the general population. The presence of PF crepitus and pain with PF compression were assessed. Anterior knee pain was determined using a knee pain map. Pain with climbing/descending stairs and walking on level ground were assessed with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Radiographs were used to define the compartment(s) of the knee affected by OA (no OA, isolated/predominant PF joint OA, and isolated/predominant TF joint OA). In knees with mixed OA, knees with more severe PF joint OA were included in the isolated/predominant PF group (the same was done for TF joint OA). We determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and positive likelihood ratio (LR+) for each test and measure individually, and the combination of these measures, in distinguishing knees with PF joint OA from knees with TF joint OA or no OA.
There were 745 knees included in the study. No measure had high sensitivity and specificity. Pain with climbing/descending stairs had the greatest sensitivity (90%) but poor specificity (15%). The combination of definite crepitus with no pain on walking had the greatest specificity (96%), PPV (53%), and LR+ (1.8), but poor sensitivity (7%).
Typical clinical examination findings and knee pain patterns commonly thought to represent underlying PF joint pathology do not discriminate knees with PF joint OA from knees without OA or TF joint OA.
评估一整套测试和测量方法在鉴别髌股(PF)和胫股(TF)骨关节炎(OA)方面的诊断性能。
临床膝关节评估研究是一项针对膝关节疼痛的一般人群研究。评估了髌股关节弹响和压痛、髌股关节压痛的存在,采用膝关节疼痛图评估了前膝关节疼痛,采用西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数评估了上下楼梯和在平地行走时的疼痛。通过 X 射线确定膝关节 OA 的受累部位(无 OA、单纯/主要 PF 关节 OA 和单纯/主要 TF 关节 OA)。在混合性 OA 膝关节中,将 PF 关节 OA 更严重的膝关节纳入单纯/主要 PF 组(TF 关节 OA 也如此)。我们分别确定了每个测试和测量方法以及这些方法组合在鉴别 PF 关节 OA 膝关节和 TF 关节 OA 或无 OA 膝关节方面的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值和阳性似然比(LR+)。
共有 745 个膝关节纳入研究。没有一种方法具有高敏感性和特异性。上下楼梯时的疼痛具有最大的敏感性(90%),但特异性较差(15%)。明确的弹响伴无行走时疼痛的组合具有最大的特异性(96%)、PPV(53%)和 LR+(1.8),但敏感性较差(7%)。
通常认为代表潜在 PF 关节病理的典型临床检查结果和膝关节疼痛模式并不能区分 PF 关节 OA 膝关节和无 OA 或 TF 关节 OA 膝关节。