• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗量与30天死亡率:一项对427467例择期、紧急和急诊病例的当代全国队列研究。

Total Center Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume and 30-Day Mortality: A Contemporary National Cohort Study of 427 467 Elective, Urgent, and Emergency Cases.

作者信息

O'Neill Darragh, Nicholas Owen, Gale Chris P, Ludman Peter, de Belder Mark A, Timmis Adam, Fox Keith A A, Simpson Iain A, Redwood Simon, Ray Simon G

机构信息

From the Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, United Kingdom (D.O., O.N.); Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, United Kingdom (C.P.G.); Department of Cardiology, York Teaching Hospital, United Kingdom (C.P.G.); Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom (P.L.); The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom (M.A.d.B.); NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Barts Heart Centre, United Kingdom (A.T.); Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom (K.A.A.F.); Wessex Cardiac Unit, University Hospital Southampton, United Kingdom (I.A.S.); King's College London/St Thomas' Hospital, United Kingdom (S.R.); University Hospitals of South Manchester, United Kingdom (S.G.R.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Mar;10(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003186.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003186
PMID:28320707
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The relationship between procedural volume and prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain, with some studies finding in favor of an inverse association and some against. This UK study provides a contemporary reassessment in one of the few countries in the world with a nationally representative PCI registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A nationwide cohort study was performed using the national British Cardiovascular Intervention Society registry. All adult patients undergoing PCI in 93 English and Welsh NHS hospitals between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed using hierarchical modeling with adjustment for patient risk. Of 427 467 procedures (22.0% primary PCI) in 93 hospitals, 30-day mortality was 1.9% (4.8% primary PCI). 87.1% of centers undertook between 200 and 2000 procedures annually. Case mix varied with center volume. In centers with 200 to 399 PCI cases per year, a smaller proportion were PCI for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (8.4%) than in centers with 1500 to 1999 PCI cases per year (24.2%), but proportionally more were for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (8.4% versus 4.3%). For the overall PCI cohort, after risk adjustment, there was no significant evidence of worse, or better, outcomes in lower volume centers from our own study, or in combination with results from other studies. For primary PCI, there was also no evidence for increased or decreased mortality in lower volume centers.

CONCLUSIONS

After adjustment for differences in case mix and clinical presentation, this study supports the conclusion of no trend for increased mortality in lower volume centers for PCI in the UK healthcare system.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02184949.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后手术量与预后之间的关系仍不明确,一些研究发现二者呈负相关,而另一些研究则持反对意见。这项英国研究在世界上少数几个拥有全国代表性PCI登记系统的国家之一进行了当代重新评估。

方法与结果

使用英国心血管介入学会国家登记系统进行了一项全国队列研究。对2007年至2013年间在93家英格兰和威尔士国民健康服务医院接受PCI的所有成年患者进行分层建模分析,并对患者风险进行调整。93家医院的427467例手术(22.0%为直接PCI)中,30天死亡率为1.9%(直接PCI为4.8%)。87.1%的中心每年进行200至2000例手术。病例组合因中心手术量而异。每年进行200至399例PCI手术的中心,因ST段抬高型心肌梗死接受PCI的比例(8.4%)低于每年进行1500至1999例PCI手术的中心(24.2%),但因ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克接受PCI的比例相对较高(8.4%对4.3%)。对于整个PCI队列,在风险调整后,无论是本研究中手术量较低的中心,还是与其他研究结果相结合,均无显著证据表明其预后更差或更好。对于直接PCI,也没有证据表明手术量较低的中心死亡率增加或降低。

结论

在对病例组合和临床表现的差异进行调整后,本研究支持以下结论:在英国医疗系统中,手术量较低的中心PCI死亡率没有增加的趋势。

临床试验注册

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT02184949。

相似文献

1
Total Center Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume and 30-Day Mortality: A Contemporary National Cohort Study of 427 467 Elective, Urgent, and Emergency Cases.全中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗量与30天死亡率:一项对427467例择期、紧急和急诊病例的当代全国队列研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Mar;10(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003186.
2
Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis.罪犯血管血运重建与多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心原性休克的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者:一项协作荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005582.
3
Temporal Trends, Complications, and Predictors of Outcomes Among Nonagenarians Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.90 岁以上人群行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的时间趋势、并发症和结局预测因素:来自退伍军人事务临床评估、报告和跟踪计划的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul 10;10(13):1295-1303. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.051.
4
Procedural Volume and Outcomes After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Kerala, India: Report of the Cardiological Society of India-Kerala Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry.印度喀拉拉邦 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的操作量与结局:印度心脏病学会-喀拉拉邦直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 16;9(12):e014968. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014968. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
5
Procedural Volume and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery DiseaseReport From the National Clinical Data (J-PCI Registry).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的操作量和结局:来自全国临床数据(J-PCI 注册研究)的报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 5;9(9):e015404. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015404. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
Complete Versus Culprit only Revascularisation in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Incidence and Outcomes from the London Heart Attack Group.在并发急性心肌梗死的心源性休克患者中,完全血运重建与罪犯血管血运重建的比较:来自伦敦心肌梗死研究组的发生率和结局。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Mar;21(3):350-358. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
7
Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Bremen STEMI Registry.未选择患者的心源性休克合并急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的管理和预后预测因素:不来梅 STEMI 注册研究结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 May;107(5):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1192-0. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
8
Correlation of Admission Heart Rate With Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Right Coronary Artery ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: HORIZONS-AMI (The Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) Trial.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的右冠状动脉ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者入院心率与血管造影及临床结局的相关性:HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死血管重建和支架置入的协调结局)试验
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 19;6(7):e006181. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006181.
9
Determinants of excess mortality following unprotected left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention.非保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入术后超额死亡率的决定因素
Heart. 2016 Aug 15;102(16):1287-95. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308739. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
10
Nonroutine Use of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction With Successful and Unsuccessful Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.非计划性使用主动脉内球囊反搏在心肌梗死合并心原性休克中的应用:初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功和失败的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 24;11(18):1885-1893. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Volume-outcome relationships for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死体外膜肺氧合的容量-结局关系
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Apr;39(2):156-163. doi: 10.1007/s12928-023-00976-1. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
2
Center Volumes Correlate with Likelihood of Stent Implantation in German Coronary Angiography.中心体积与德国冠状动脉造影中支架植入的可能性相关。
J Interv Cardiol. 2023 Nov 9;2023:3723657. doi: 10.1155/2023/3723657. eCollection 2023.
3
Volume-outcome relationship in complication-related mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions: an analysis on the failure-to-rescue rate in the Japanese Nationwide Registry.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后并发症相关死亡率的量效关系:日本全国注册研究中抢救失败率的分析。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2023 Oct;38(4):388-394. doi: 10.1007/s12928-023-00935-w. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
4
Association between operator volume and mortality in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中术者手术量与死亡率的关系。
Open Heart. 2022 Oct;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002072.
5
Volume-Outcome Relationships for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的量效关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;11(6):e023805. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023805. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
6
Impact of Operator Volumes and Experience on Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后术者手术量和经验对结局的影响:来自退伍军人事务部临床评估、报告和跟踪(CART)计划的见解。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jul;40:64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
7
Risk prediction in multicentre studies when there is confounding by cluster or informative cluster size.多中心研究中存在簇或信息簇大小混杂时的风险预测。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jul 4;21(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01321-x.
8
The relationship between procedural volume and patient outcomes for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的手术量与患者预后的关系:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
HRB Open Res. 2021 Jan 28;4:10. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13203.1. eCollection 2021.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention procedures performed at a hospital in Southern Brazil.在巴西南部一家医院进行的经皮冠状动脉介入手术。
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Aug 15;10(3):164-173. eCollection 2020.
10
Procedural Volume and Outcomes After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Kerala, India: Report of the Cardiological Society of India-Kerala Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry.印度喀拉拉邦 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的操作量与结局:印度心脏病学会-喀拉拉邦直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 16;9(12):e014968. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014968. Epub 2020 Jun 1.