School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Int Dent J. 2017 Oct;67(5):294-298. doi: 10.1111/idj.12297. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
Oral piercing can lead to complications and dentists are in a unique position to detect such complications. The purpose of this study was: (i) to assess the immediate and the long-term effects, on dental students, of a training programme about oral piercing knowledge; and (ii) to assess the immediate effect, on adolescents, of a single educational intervention session about oral piercing.
A training programme for dental students (n = 66) was carried out in three phases. The last phase consisted of preparing and giving talks about oral piercing at schools, which was delivered by a random selection of dental students involved in the training programme. Dental students answered a questionnaire about oral piercing knowledge, before, immediately after (only the dental students included in the last phase) and 12 months after the training programme. Adolescents (n = 347) answered a survey about oral piercing knowledge before and after the talks.
There were statistically significant differences in all comparison groups, except for the results in the 'before intervention' and in the '12 months after intervention' groups among dental students who had not prepared and given the talks to adolescents. Knowledge about oral piercing significantly improved among adolescents when comparing results before (mean questionnaire score = 3.0) and after (mean questionnaire score = 6.2) the talks.
Oral piercing educational intervention had a favourable impact on adolescents and dental students, particularly among those who were more involved in the learning process.
口腔穿刺可能会导致并发症,而牙医在发现这些并发症方面处于独特的位置。本研究的目的是:(i)评估口腔穿刺知识培训计划对牙科学生的即时和长期影响;(ii)评估单次口腔穿刺教育干预对青少年的即时影响。
对 66 名牙科学生进行了培训计划,该计划分三个阶段进行。最后一个阶段包括在学校准备和进行有关口腔穿刺的演讲,由参与培训计划的随机选择的牙科学生进行。牙科学生在培训计划之前、之后(仅包括在最后阶段参与的牙科学生)和 12 个月后回答了有关口腔穿刺知识的问卷。青少年(n = 347)在演讲之前和之后回答了关于口腔穿刺知识的调查。
在所有比较组中都存在统计学上的显著差异,除了未准备和向青少年进行演讲的牙科学生的“干预前”和“干预后 12 个月”组的结果。在演讲前后,青少年的口腔穿刺知识显著提高(问卷平均得分:3.0 对 6.2)。
口腔穿刺教育干预对青少年和牙科学生产生了有利的影响,尤其是在那些更参与学习过程的学生中。