• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用Restrict保护方法对双侧颈动脉狭窄进行单独颈动脉支架置入术的可行性和安全性

The Feasibility and Safety of Separate Carotid Artery Stenting Using the Restrict Protective Method for Bilateral Carotid Stenosis.

作者信息

Ohshima Tomotaka, Bishnori Ishu, Ishikawa Kojiro, Goto Shunsaku, Yamamoto Taiki, Kato Yoko

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, Kariya, Japan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Maharaja Agarsen Medical College, Agroha, Hisar, Haryana, India; Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University, Banbuntane Hotokukai Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;102:235-239. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.027. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.027
PMID:28323191
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The treatment strategy for bilateral carotid stenosis (BCS) is not clear. We report our experience of treating 12 patients with BCS using separate carotid artery stenting (CAS) using the restrict protective method. The order of treatment site and the protective method are also discussed.

METHODS

Between April 2012 and November 2016, 24 lesions in 12 patients (range, 44-83 years; mean, 71 years; 1 woman) underwent CAS at Kariya Toyota General Hospital. These cases were reviewed retrospectively. In all cases, CAS was first performed on the more severely stenosed site. All procedures were performed using the proximal protective method involving balloons and a filter device. We took into consideration adverse events including death from any cause, major stroke within 30 days, and death between 30 days and 1 year later from any stroke.

RESULTS

All procedures were successfully performed under local anesthesia. There was not a single case that showed intolerance during flow arrest to prevent distal embolisms. We observed no adverse events, restenosis, or recurrent symptoms during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Good outcomes can be achieved in patients with BCS when attempting separate CAS using the restrict protective method.

摘要

背景与目的

双侧颈动脉狭窄(BCS)的治疗策略尚不清楚。我们报告了采用限流保护法对12例BCS患者行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的经验。同时也讨论了治疗部位的顺序及保护方法。

方法

2012年4月至2016年11月,12例患者(年龄44 - 83岁,平均71岁;1例女性)的24处病变在刈谷丰田综合医院接受了CAS治疗。对这些病例进行回顾性分析。所有病例均首先对狭窄更严重的部位进行CAS。所有手术均采用涉及球囊和滤器装置的近端保护法。我们考虑了包括任何原因导致的死亡、30天内的严重卒中以及30天至1年后因任何卒中导致的死亡等不良事件。

结果

所有手术均在局部麻醉下成功完成。在防止远端栓塞的血流阻断过程中,没有一例出现不耐受情况。随访期间未观察到不良事件、再狭窄或复发症状。

结论

采用限流保护法对BCS患者行单独CAS治疗可取得良好疗效。

相似文献

1
The Feasibility and Safety of Separate Carotid Artery Stenting Using the Restrict Protective Method for Bilateral Carotid Stenosis.采用Restrict保护方法对双侧颈动脉狭窄进行单独颈动脉支架置入术的可行性和安全性
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;102:235-239. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.027. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Prospective registry of carotid artery stenting in Japan--investigation on device and antiplatelet for carotid artery stenting.日本颈动脉支架置入术前瞻性注册研究——颈动脉支架置入术的器械与抗血小板治疗调查
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Jul;23(6):1374-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.11.018. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
3
Comparison of dual protection and distal filter protection as a distal embolic protection method during carotid artery stenting: a single-center carotid artery stenting experience.颈动脉支架置入术中双保护与远端滤网保护作为远端栓塞保护方法的比较:单中心颈动脉支架置入经验
Neurosurg Rev. 2015 Oct;38(4):671-6. doi: 10.1007/s10143-015-0639-x. Epub 2015 May 9.
4
Feasibility and Safety of Simultaneous Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting for Bilateral Carotid Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience using a Hybrid Procedure.双侧颈动脉狭窄同期行颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的可行性与安全性:采用杂交手术的单中心经验
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 May;33:138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.11.017. Epub 2016 Feb 21.
5
Grayscale median analysis of primary stenosis and restenosis after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后原发性狭窄和再狭窄的灰度中位数分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):978-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.094. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
6
Treatment Strategy for Bilateral Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis: One Center's Experience.双侧严重颈动脉狭窄的治疗策略:单中心经验
World Neurosurg. 2015 Sep;84(3):820-5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.03.067. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
7
Initial experience with cerebral protection devices to prevent embolization during carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中使用脑保护装置预防栓塞的初步经验。
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Dec;36(6):1175-85. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.129488.
8
Comparison of carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a single center study.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较:单中心研究。
Adv Ther. 2013 Sep;30(9):845-53. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0058-8. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
9
A comparison of carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection versus carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia.局部麻醉下颈动脉支架置入术联合神经保护与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较。
Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):696-700. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.005.
10
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients.颈动脉狭窄高危患者颈动脉支架置入术的结果:单神经血管中心 101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):448-53; discussion 453-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365008.17803.AD.

引用本文的文献

1
Precautions for using a Filter Protection Device with a Flow Reversal Method during Carotid Artery Stenting: A Case Report on In-Filter Thrombus.颈动脉支架置入术中使用血流逆转法滤过保护装置的注意事项:一例滤器内血栓病例报告
Asian J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul-Sep;14(3):1008-1010. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_296_18.