Bishop Stacy H, Szymanski David J, Ryan Greg A, Herron Robert L, Bishop Phil A
1University of Montevallo, Montevallo, Alabama; 2Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana; 3Catawba College, Salisbury, North Carolina; and 4The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Aug;31(8):2060-2065. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001680.
Bishop, SH, Szymanski, DJ, Ryan, GA, Herron, RL, and Bishop, PA. The effect of intermittent vest cooling on thermoregulation and cardiovascular strain in baseball catchers. J Strength Cond Res 31(8): 2060-2065, 2017-Baseball catchers are exposed to multiple physiological challenges while playing outside during the spring and summer months, many of which deal with recovery and thermoregulation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of intermittent cooling on core temperature, cardiovascular strain, exertion, and recovery during a simulated catching performance in the heat. Six trained college-aged baseball catchers performed in a controlled, hot (35° C), and humid (25% relative humidity) environment in a counter-balanced, cross-over design. Ice vest cooling (VC) was used as a cooling modality and was compared with a control of no cooling (NC). Rectal temperature (Tre), heart rate (HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and perceived recovery scale (PRS) were recorded before and after each simulated inning. All activities took place in a heat chamber, and each inning consisted of catchers receiving 12 pitches in their position followed by 6 minutes of recovery. Nine total innings were performed, and 27 total innings were performed with each of the 2 treatments. A significantly smaller mean Tre change was seen in VC when compared with NC (0.58 ± 0.2° C, 0.98 ± 0.2° C, p ≤ 0.01, respectively). Rating of perceived exertion was significantly lower and PRS was significantly improved for VC compared with NC (both p ≤ 0.05). Mean recovery HR during VC was significantly lower than NC in the fifth (VC = 84 ± 8 b·min, NC = 90 ± 9 b·min, p = 0.04), seventh (VC = 84 ± 3 b·min, NC = 92 ± 7 b·min, p = 0.02), and ninth (VC = 85 ± 7 b·min, NC = 93 ± 5 b·min, p = 0.01) innings. Heart rate during catching was significantly lower at the end of the VC trials when compared with NC (108 ± 16 b·min vs. 120 ± 19 b·min, p = 0.02, respectively). Vest cooling decreased heat strain, cardiovascular strain, and RPE while it improved perceived recovery in catchers over a simulated 3-game series performed in hot conditions.
毕晓普、SH、希曼斯基、DJ、瑞安、GA、赫伦、RL以及毕晓普、PA。间歇性背心冷却对棒球接球手体温调节和心血管压力的影响。《力量与体能研究杂志》31(8): 2060 - 2065, 2017年——棒球接球手在春夏季户外比赛时面临多种生理挑战,其中许多与恢复和体温调节有关。本研究的目的是调查在炎热环境下模拟接球表现期间间歇性冷却对核心体温、心血管压力、运动强度和恢复的影响。六名受过训练的大学年龄棒球接球手在一个可控的、炎热(35°C)且潮湿(相对湿度25%)的环境中,采用平衡交叉设计进行测试。使用冰背心冷却(VC)作为冷却方式,并与无冷却对照组(NC)进行比较。在每个模拟局前后记录直肠温度(Tre)、心率(HR)、主观用力感觉评分(RPE)和主观恢复量表(PRS)。所有活动均在热室中进行,每一局包括接球手在其位置上接12个投球,然后休息6分钟。总共进行了9局,两种处理方式各进行27局。与NC组相比,VC组的平均Tre变化显著更小(分别为0.58±0.2°C和0.98±0.2°C,p≤0.01)。与NC组相比,VC组的主观用力感觉评分显著更低,PRS显著改善(两者p≤0.05)。在第五局(VC = 84±8次·分钟,NC = 90±9次·分钟,p = 0.04)、第七局(VC = 84±3次·分钟,NC = 92±7次·分钟,p = 0.02)和第九局(VC = 85±7次·分钟,NC =