Pardini Eleanor A, Patten Melissa V, Knight Tiffany M
Environmental Studies, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, Box 1137, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA
Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies, San Francisco State University, 3150 Paradise Drive, Tiburon, California 94920, USA.
Am J Bot. 2017 Mar;104(3):389-398. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600290. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
Biotic interactions such as seed predation can play a role in explaining patterns of abundance among plant species. The effect of seed predation will depend on how the strength of predation differs across species and environments, and on the degree to which seed loss at one life-cycle phase increases fitness at another phase. Few studies have simultaneously quantified predispersal and postdispersal predation in co-occurring rare and common congeners, despite the value of estimating both for understanding causes of rarity.
We quantified predispersal seed predation on the rare, herbaceous species (Fabaceae) and its common, shrubby congener across multiple years in the same community. We experimentally measured postdispersal seed predation at two seed densities and locations near or far from an exotic grass housing high densities of deer mice (), their primary, native seed predator.
The common had the lowest predispersal seed predation of the two lupine species, potentially because of its height: its high racemes received less predation than those low to the ground. By contrast, the same species experienced higher postdispersal seed predation, and at predators traveled long distances away from refuge habitat to consume their seeds. Across both plant species, mice preferentially predated high-density seed sources.
Our results show differences in the magnitude and direction of seed predation between the species across different life-cycle phases. We demonstrated possible roles of proximity to refuge habitat, seed density, and seed size in these patterns. Congeneric comparisons would benefit from a comprehensive framework that considers seed predation across different life-cycle phases and the environmental context of predation.
种子捕食等生物相互作用在解释植物物种间的丰度模式方面可能发挥作用。种子捕食的影响将取决于捕食强度在不同物种和环境中的差异程度,以及一个生命周期阶段的种子损失在另一个阶段提高适合度的程度。尽管估计种子传播前和传播后的捕食对于理解稀有性的原因都很有价值,但很少有研究同时对同域分布的稀有和常见同属植物进行这两种捕食的量化。
我们在同一群落中对多年来稀有草本物种(豆科)及其常见的灌木状同属植物的种子传播前捕食进行了量化。我们通过实验测量了两种种子密度以及在靠近或远离高密度鹿鼠(它们主要的本地种子捕食者)栖息的外来草丛的两个位置的种子传播后捕食情况。
在这两种羽扇豆属植物中,常见的那种植物种子传播前的捕食率最低,这可能是因为其高度:它较高的总状花序受到的捕食比贴近地面的花序少。相比之下,同一物种在种子传播后的捕食率较高,而且捕食者会从避难栖息地长途跋涉去取食它们的种子。在这两种植物中,老鼠都优先捕食高密度的种子源。
我们的结果表明,不同物种在不同生命周期阶段的种子捕食在程度和方向上存在差异。我们证明了接近避难栖息地、种子密度和种子大小在这些模式中可能起到的作用。同属植物的比较将受益于一个综合框架,该框架考虑不同生命周期阶段的种子捕食以及捕食的环境背景。