Suppr超能文献

声学惊吓反应改变作为评估小鼠听觉功能的工具:进展、陷阱与潜力

Acoustic startle modification as a tool for evaluating auditory function of the mouse: Progress, pitfalls, and potential.

作者信息

Lauer Amanda M, Behrens Derik, Klump Georg

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Center for Hearing and Balance, Johns Hopkins University, 515 Traylor Building, 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Animal Physiology & Behavior Group, Department for Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl Von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Carl Von Ossietzky Str. 9-11, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Jun;77:194-208. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 19.

Abstract

Acoustic startle response (ASR) modification procedures, especially prepulse inhibition (PPI), are increasingly used as behavioral measures of auditory processing and sensorimotor gating in rodents due to their perceived ease of implementation and short testing times. In practice, ASR and PPI procedures are extremely variable across animals, experimental setups, and studies, and the interpretation of results is subject to numerous caveats and confounding influences. We review considerations for modification of the ASR using acoustic stimuli, and we compare the sensitivity of PPI procedures to more traditional operant psychoacoustic techniques. We also discuss non-auditory variables that must be considered. We conclude that ASR and PPI measures cannot substitute for traditional operant techniques due to their low sensitivity. Additionally, a substantial amount of pilot testing must be performed to properly optimize an ASR modification experiment, negating any time benefit over operant conditioning. Nevertheless, there are some circumstances where ASR measures may be the only option for assessing auditory behavior, such as when testing mouse strains with early-onset hearing loss or learning impairments.

摘要

听觉惊吓反应(ASR)修正程序,尤其是前脉冲抑制(PPI),由于其被认为易于实施且测试时间短,越来越多地被用作啮齿动物听觉处理和感觉运动门控的行为测量方法。实际上,ASR和PPI程序在不同动物、实验设置和研究中差异极大,结果的解释存在诸多注意事项和混杂影响。我们回顾了使用声学刺激修正ASR的注意事项,并比较了PPI程序与更传统的操作性心理声学技术的敏感性。我们还讨论了必须考虑的非听觉变量。我们得出结论,由于ASR和PPI测量的低敏感性,它们不能替代传统的操作性技术。此外,必须进行大量的预试验以适当优化ASR修正实验,这抵消了相对于操作性条件反射的任何时间优势。然而,在某些情况下,ASR测量可能是评估听觉行为的唯一选择,例如在测试患有早发性听力损失或学习障碍的小鼠品系时。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Sound-seeking before and after hearing loss in mice.小鼠听力损失前后的声寻求行为。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 19;14(1):19181. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67577-7.
4
Sound-seeking before and after hearing loss in mice.小鼠听力丧失前后的声音寻找行为。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jan 9:2024.01.08.574475. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.08.574475.
10
Auditory Behavior in Adult-Blinded Mice.成年盲鼠的听觉行为。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 Apr;23(2):225-239. doi: 10.1007/s10162-022-00835-5. Epub 2022 Jan 27.

本文引用的文献

9
Animal models of tinnitus.耳鸣的动物模型。
Hear Res. 2016 Aug;338:88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.10.011.
10
An improved approach to separating startle data from noise.一种将惊吓数据与噪声分离的改进方法。
J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Sep 30;253:206-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验