Kahrs Birgitte H, Usman Sana, Ghi Tullio, Youssef Aly, Torkildsen Erik A, Lindtjørn Elsa, Østborg Tilde B, Benediktsdottir Sigurlaug, Brooks Lis, Harmsen Lotte, Romundstad Pål R, Salvesen Kjell Å, Lees Christoph C, Eggebø Torbjørn M
National Center for Fetal Medicine, Trondheim University Hospital (St Olav's Hospital) and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's and Women's Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Centre for Fetal Care, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):69.e1-69.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 19.
Safe management of the second stage of labor is of great importance. Unnecessary interventions should be avoided and correct timing of interventions should be focused. Ultrasound assessment of fetal position and station has a potential to improve the precision in diagnosing and managing prolonged or arrested labors. The decision to perform vacuum delivery is traditionally based on subjective assessment by digital vaginal examination and clinical expertise and there is currently no method of objectively quantifying the likelihood of successful delivery. Prolonged attempts at vacuum delivery are associated with neonatal morbidity and maternal trauma, especially so if the procedure is unsuccessful and a cesarean is performed.
The aim of the study was to assess if ultrasound measurements of fetal position and station can predict duration of vacuum extractions, mode of delivery, and fetal outcome in nulliparous women with prolonged second stage of labor.
We performed a prospective cohort study in nulliparous women at term with prolonged second stage of labor in 7 European maternity units from 2013 through 2016. Fetal head position and station were determined using transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound, respectively. Our preliminary clinical experience assessing head-perineum distance prior to vacuum delivery suggested that we should set 25 mm for the power calculation, a level corresponding roughly to +2 below the ischial spines. The main outcome was duration of vacuum extraction in relation to ultrasound measured head-perineum distance with a predefined cut-off of 25 mm, and 220 women were needed to discriminate between groups using a hazard ratio of 1.5 with 80% power and alpha 5%. Secondary outcomes were delivery mode and umbilical artery cord blood samples after birth. The time interval was evaluated using survival analyses, and the outcomes of delivery were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and descriptive statistics. Results were analyzed according to intention to treat.
The study population comprised 222 women. The duration of vacuum extraction was shorter in women with head-perineum distance ≤25 mm (log rank test <0.01). The estimated median duration in women with head-perineum distance ≤25 mm was 6.0 (95% confidence interval, 5.2-6.8) minutes vs 8.0 (95% confidence interval, 7.1-8.9) minutes in women with head-perineum distance >25 mm. The head-perineum distance was associated with spontaneous delivery with area under the curve 83% (95% confidence interval, 77-89%) and associated with cesarean with area under the curve 83% (95% confidence interval, 74-92%). In women with head-perineum distance ≤35 mm, 7/181 (3.9%) were delivered by cesarean vs 9/41 (22.0%) in women with head-perineum distance >35 mm (P <.01). Ultrasound-assessed position was occiput anterior in 73%. Only 3/138 (2.2%) fetuses in occiput anterior position and head-perineum distance ≤35 mm vs 6/17 (35.3%) with nonocciput anterior position and head-perineum distance >35 mm were delivered by cesarean. Umbilical cord arterial pH <7.10 occurred in 2/144 (1.4%) women with head-perineum distance ≤35 mm compared to 8/40 (20.0%) with head-perineum distance >35 mm (P < .01).
Ultrasound has the potential to predict labor outcome in women with prolonged second stage of labor. The information obtained could guide whether vacuum delivery should be attempted or if cesarean is preferable, whether senior staff should be in attendance, and if the vacuum attempt should be performed in the operating theater.
第二产程的安全管理至关重要。应避免不必要的干预,并注重干预的正确时机。超声评估胎儿位置和先露部有可能提高诊断和处理产程延长或停滞的准确性。传统上,决定实施真空吸引分娩是基于手指阴道检查的主观评估和临床经验,目前尚无客观量化成功分娩可能性的方法。长时间尝试真空吸引分娩与新生儿发病率和母体创伤相关,尤其是在操作不成功而改行剖宫产时更是如此。
本研究的目的是评估超声测量胎儿位置和先露部能否预测初产妇第二产程延长时真空吸引的持续时间、分娩方式及胎儿结局。
2013年至2016年,我们在7家欧洲产科单位对足月初产妇且第二产程延长的患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。分别采用经腹和经会阴超声确定胎儿头部位置和先露部。我们在真空吸引分娩前评估头-会阴距离的初步临床经验表明,我们应设定25mm用于功效计算,该水平大致对应于坐骨棘以下2cm。主要结局是与超声测量的头-会阴距离相关的真空吸引持续时间,预定义的截断值为25mm,需要220名女性以1.5的风险比、80%的功效和5%的α水平来区分不同组。次要结局是分娩方式和出生后脐动脉血样。使用生存分析评估时间间隔,使用受试者工作特征曲线和描述性统计评估分娩结局。根据意向性分析对结果进行分析。
研究人群包括222名女性。头-会阴距离≤25mm的女性真空吸引持续时间较短(对数秩检验<0.01)。头-会阴距离≤25mm的女性估计中位持续时间为6.0(95%置信区间,5.2 - 6.8)分钟,而头-会阴距离>25mm的女性为8.0(95%置信区间,7.1 - 8.9)分钟。头-会阴距离与自然分娩相关,曲线下面积为83%(95%置信区间,77 - 89%),与剖宫产相关,曲线下面积为83%(95%置信区间,74 - 92%)。头-会阴距离≤35mm的女性中,7/181(3.9%)通过剖宫产分娩,而头-会阴距离>35mm的女性中为9/41(22.0%)(P<.01)。超声评估胎位为枕前位的占73%。枕前位且头-会阴距离≤35mm的胎儿中只有3/138(2.2%)通过剖宫产分娩,而非枕前位且头-会阴距离>35mm的胎儿中为6/17(35.3%)。头-会阴距离≤35mm的女性中2/144(1.4%)脐动脉pH<7.10,而头-会阴距离>35mm的女性中为8/40(20.0%)(P<.01)。
超声有潜力预测第二产程延长女性的分娩结局。所获得的信息可指导是否应尝试真空吸引分娩或剖宫产是否更可取,是否应有资深人员在场,以及真空吸引尝试是否应在手术室进行。