• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网支持团体对照顾者的社会支持、自我效能和照顾者负担的影响:一项荟萃分析。

The Effect of Internet Group Support for Caregivers on Social Support, Self-Efficacy, and Caregiver Burden: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

1 Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri , Columbia, Missouri.

2 Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Missouri , Columbia, Missouri.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2017 Aug;23(8):621-629. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0183. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1089/tmj.2016.0183
PMID:28328392
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Family caregivers are socially isolated and burdened as they care for their loved one, often for many years. Internet support groups can address some of the barriers related to the social isolation, self-efficacy, and burden experienced during caregiving by connecting individuals with similar problems to one another. The purpose of the meta-analysis was to analyze the effect of Internet-based group support interventions on social support, self-efficacy, and burden.

METHODS

A two-step search process was used to identify peer reviewed evidence to answer the research question. Multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and several others, were searched to identify systematic reviews from which to identify the final articles for data extraction.

RESULTS

Seven systematic reviews identified 10 studies to answer the research question. A statistically significant effect was found from the interventions targeting social support and self-efficacy. We were unable to assess the effect of these interventions on caregiver burden due to the variance in measurement constructs.

CONCLUSIONS

While it has been found that Internet group support interventions have a positive effect on social support and self-efficacy, the size and quality of studies are moderate, and thus, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed for a higher level of evidence.

摘要

简介

照顾者在照顾亲人时会感到社交孤立和负担过重,这种情况通常会持续多年。互联网支持小组可以通过将有类似问题的个人联系在一起,解决一些与社交孤立、自我效能感和照顾负担相关的障碍。本荟萃分析的目的是分析基于互联网的小组支持干预措施对社会支持、自我效能感和负担的影响。

方法

采用两步搜索过程来确定同行评审证据,以回答研究问题。我们检索了多个数据库,包括 MEDLINE、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、CINAHL、PsycINFO 等,以确定可从中识别出最终文章进行数据提取的系统评价。

结果

7 项系统评价确定了 10 项研究来回答研究问题。针对社会支持和自我效能的干预措施具有统计学显著效果。由于测量结构的差异,我们无法评估这些干预措施对照顾者负担的影响。

结论

虽然已经发现互联网小组支持干预措施对社会支持和自我效能感有积极影响,但研究的规模和质量中等,因此需要进行大规模的随机对照试验以获得更高水平的证据。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Internet Group Support for Caregivers on Social Support, Self-Efficacy, and Caregiver Burden: A Meta-Analysis.互联网支持团体对照顾者的社会支持、自我效能和照顾者负担的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Aug;23(8):621-629. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0183. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
2
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
3
Caregiver-Focused, Web-Based Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Part 2).以照顾者为中心的基于网络的干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析(第2部分)
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 26;20(10):e11247. doi: 10.2196/11247.
4
Online Support Groups for Family Caregivers: Scoping Review.在线支持小组为家庭照顾者:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 13;25:e46858. doi: 10.2196/46858.
5
Components and Outcomes of Internet-Based Interventions for Caregivers of Older Adults: Systematic Review.基于互联网的老年人照料者干预措施的组成部分及结果:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 19;19(9):e313. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7896.
6
[Caregiving burden and associated factors among caregivers of terminally ill gastrointestinal cancer patients].[晚期胃肠道癌患者照顾者的照顾负担及相关因素]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2011 Dec;58(6):54-64.
7
Using Web-based interventions to support caregivers of patients with cancer: a systematic review.使用基于网络的干预措施来支持癌症患者的护理人员:一项系统综述。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2015 Mar;42(2):156-64. doi: 10.1188/15.ONF.156-164.
8
A systematic review of social support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: Are they doing what they promise?对痴呆症患者照料者社会支持干预措施的系统评价:它们是否兑现了承诺?
Maturitas. 2016 Mar;85:117-30. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
9
Family caregiver support groups: spiritual reflections' impact on stress management.家庭护理人员支持小组:精神反思对压力管理的影响。
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Jan;22(1):70-76. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1231169. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
Integrative Review on the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Interactive Programs for Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Treatment.基于互联网的互动项目对接受治疗的乳腺癌女性有效性的综合综述。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Mar 1;44(2):E42-E54. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.E42-E54.

引用本文的文献

1
A feasibility study on embedding the usual Chinese iSupport and tailored Chinese iSupport programs in aged care services.一项关于将常规中文iSupport和定制中文iSupport项目嵌入老年护理服务的可行性研究。
Australas J Ageing. 2025 Sep;44(3):e70072. doi: 10.1111/ajag.70072.
2
Effects of Physical Exercise on the Physical and Mental Health of Family Caregivers: A Systematic Review.体育锻炼对家庭照顾者身心健康的影响:一项系统综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 20;13(10):1196. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13101196.
3
Effectiveness of Telemedicine-Based Intervention on Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy in Iranian Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
基于远程医疗的干预对伊朗女性母乳喂养自我效能的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2025 Jan;54(1):13-23. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i1.17571.
4
Technological Innovations to Support Family Caregivers: A Scoping Review.支持家庭照顾者的技术创新:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 25;12(23):2350. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232350.
5
App providing psychosocial and educational supports benefits caregivers of children with newly diagnosed food allergies.提供心理社会和教育支持的应用程序对新诊断出食物过敏儿童的照顾者有益。
J Food Allergy. 2022 Dec 1;4(3):163-171. doi: 10.2500/jfa.2022.4.220035. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Associations of role, area deprivation index, and race with health behaviors and body mass index among localized prostate cancer patients and their partners.局限性前列腺癌患者及其伴侣的角色、地区贫困指数和种族与健康行为及体重指数之间的关联。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01625-z.
7
A Web-Based Peer Support Network to Help Care Partners of People With Serious Illness: Co-Design Study.基于网络的同伴支持网络,帮助照顾重病患者的人:共同设计研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 8;11:e53194. doi: 10.2196/53194.
8
Social capital for carers of patients with advanced organ failure: a qualitative exploration of stakeholders' perspectives.晚期器官衰竭患者照护者的社会资本:利益相关者观点的定性探索。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 2;24(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18213-6.
9
In-Person Social Interactions and Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploring the Role of Household Size and Virtual Social Contact Among Midlife and Older Black South African Adults.面对面社交互动和 COVID-19 大流行期间的焦虑:探索中年和老年南非黑人成年人中家庭规模和虚拟社交接触的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Apr 1;79(4). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad175.
10
Depressive Symptoms in Caregivers of Hospice Cancer Patients. Hospice 癌症患者照料者的抑郁症状。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Jun;41(7):786-791. doi: 10.1177/10499091231194359. Epub 2023 Aug 3.