Suppr超能文献

单侧乳房重建与双侧乳房重建:少真的就多吗?

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Breast Reconstruction: Is Less Really More?

作者信息

Kuykendall Lauren V, Tugertimur Bugra, Agoris Corin, Bijan Sara, Kumar Ambuj, Dayicioglu Deniz

机构信息

From the *Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Morsani College of Medicine, †Morsani College of Medicine, and §Department of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida; and ‡Comprehensive Breast Program, Department of Women's Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;78(6S Suppl 5):S275-S278. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001030.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Over the recent years, there has been an increase in prophylactic mastectomies with an associated increase in bilateral breast reconstruction. We aimed to compare outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction with unilateral versus bilateral breast reconstruction after deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and implant-based reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients who underwent breast reconstruction by a single surgeon between July 2011 and July 2015 were surveyed using the independently validated BREAST-Q questionnaire. Mean satisfaction scores between patients undergoing unilateral versus bilateral breast reconstruction were compared and stratified based on the type of reconstruction [eg, DIEP flap, tissue expander to implant (TE/I)]. Groups were further categorized by age (patients <55 years and ≥55 years of age) and body mass index (<24.9 and >24.9). Complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 308 patients included, 118 (38%) had unilateral reconstruction (42 TE/I and 76 DIEP) and 190 (62%) had bilateral reconstruction (124 TE/I and 66 DIEP). A total of 95 patient surveys were included (31% response rate). Overall, patients receiving unilateral reconstruction demonstrated increased satisfaction with outcome (P = 0.028), psychosocial well-being (P = 0.043), and sexual well-being (P = 0.002). Complication rates were similar between unilateral and bilateral reconstruction. No significant differences for satisfaction were found in the TE/I group (N = 58; unilateral, 10; bilateral, 48).In the DIEP group (N = 37; unilateral, 20; bilateral, 17), those receiving unilateral reconstruction had higher satisfaction with outcome (P = 0.013) and sexual well-being (P = 0.014).Additionally, younger patients (<55 years) were more likely to undergo bilateral reconstruction (P = 0.018). Body mass index did not have a significant association with unilateral or bilateral reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing DIEP flap reconstruction showed higher satisfaction with unilateral reconstruction, whereas patients receiving TE/I reconstruction, either unilateral or bilateral, were equally satisified. Additionally, younger women were more likely to undergo bilateral reconstruction, which is consistent with current data trends. When considering surgical options, unilateral DIEP flap reconstruction may provide improved outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction when compared with bilateral reconstruction in select patients.

摘要

目的

近年来,预防性乳房切除术有所增加,双侧乳房重建也随之增多。我们旨在比较采用腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣和植入物重建的单侧与双侧乳房重建患者的满意度。

方法

对2011年7月至2015年7月间由同一位外科医生进行乳房重建的患者,使用经独立验证的BREAST-Q问卷进行调查。比较单侧与双侧乳房重建患者的平均满意度得分,并根据重建类型[如DIEP皮瓣、组织扩张器至植入物(TE/I)]进行分层。根据年龄(<55岁和≥55岁)和体重指数(<24.9和>24.9)对组进一步分类。记录并发症情况。

结果

纳入的308例患者中,118例(38%)进行了单侧重建(42例TE/I和76例DIEP),190例(62%)进行了双侧重建(124例TE/I和66例DIEP)。共纳入95份患者调查问卷(回复率31%)。总体而言,接受单侧重建的患者对手术结果(P = 0.028)、心理社会幸福感(P = 0.043)和性幸福感(P = 0.002)的满意度更高。单侧和双侧重建的并发症发生率相似。TE/I组(N = 58;单侧10例,双侧48例)的满意度无显著差异。在DIEP组(N = 37;单侧20例,双侧17例)中,接受单侧重建的患者对手术结果(P = 0.013)和性幸福感(P = 0.014)的满意度更高。此外,年轻患者(<55岁)更有可能接受双侧重建(P = 0.018)。体重指数与单侧或双侧重建无显著关联。

结论

接受DIEP皮瓣重建的患者对单侧重建的满意度更高,而接受TE/I重建(单侧或双侧)的患者满意度相同。此外,年轻女性更有可能接受双侧重建,这与当前数据趋势一致。在考虑手术方案时,与部分患者的双侧重建相比,单侧DIEP皮瓣重建在患者满意度方面可能会提供更好的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验