Rinker Brian, Zoldos Jozef, Weber Renata V, Ko Jason, Thayer Wesley, Greenberg Jeffrey, Leversedge Fraser J, Safa Bauback, Buncke Gregory
From the *Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; †Arizona Center for Hand Surgery, Phoenix, AZ; ‡Institute for Nerve, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, Rutherford, NJ; §Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA; ∥Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; ¶Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center, Indianapolis, IN; #Duke University Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Durham, NC; and **The Buncke Clinic, San Francisco, CA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;78(6S Suppl 5):S292-S295. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001037.
Processed nerve allografts (PNAs) have been demonstrated to have improved clinical results compared with hollow conduits for reconstruction of digital nerve gaps less than 25 mm; however, the use of PNAs for longer gaps warrants further clinical investigation. Long nerve gaps have been traditionally hard to study because of low incidence. The advent of the RANGER registry, a large, institutional review board-approved, active database for PNA (Avance Nerve Graft; AxoGen, Inc, Alachua, FL) has allowed evaluation of lower incidence subsets. The RANGER database was queried for digital nerve repairs of 25 mm or greater. Demographics, injury, treatment, and functional outcomes were recorded on standardized forms. Patients younger than 18 and those lacking quantitative follow-up data were excluded. Recovery was graded according to the Medical Research Council Classification for sensory function, with meaningful recovery defined as S3 or greater level. Fifty digital nerve injuries in 28 subjects were included. There were 22 male and 6 female subjects, and the mean age was 45. Three patients gave a previous history of diabetes, and there were 6 active smokers. The most commonly reported mechanisms of injury were saw injuries (n = 13), crushing injuries (n = 9), resection of neuroma (n = 9), amputation/avulsions (n = 8), sharp lacerations (n = 7), and blast/gunshots (n = 4). The average gap length was 35 ± 8 mm (range, 25-50 mm). Recovery to the S3 or greater level was reported in 86% of repairs. Static 2-point discrimination (s2PD) and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWF) were the most common completed assessments. Mean s2PD in 24 repairs reporting 2PD data was 9 ± 4 mm. For the 38 repairs with SWF data, protective sensation was reported in 33 repairs, deep pressure in 2, and no recovery in 3. These data compared favorably with historical data for nerve autograft repairs, with reported levels of meaningful recovery of 60% to 88%. There were no reported adverse effects. Processed nerve allograft can be used to reconstruct long gap nerve defects in the hand with consistently high rates of meaningful recovery. Results for PNA repairs of digital nerve injuries with gaps longer than 25 mm compare favorably with historical reports for nerve autograft repair but without donor site morbidity.
与中空导管相比,已证实处理过的神经同种异体移植物(PNA)在修复小于25毫米的指神经缺损方面具有更好的临床效果;然而,将PNA用于更长的缺损仍需进一步的临床研究。由于发病率低,传统上长神经缺损很难研究。RANGER注册库的出现,这是一个经机构审查委员会批准的大型PNA(Avance神经移植物;AxoGen公司,佛罗里达州阿拉楚阿)活性数据库,使得对低发病率亚组的评估成为可能。查询RANGER数据库以获取25毫米或更长的指神经修复数据。人口统计学、损伤情况、治疗方法和功能结果都记录在标准化表格上。排除年龄小于18岁的患者以及缺乏定量随访数据的患者。根据医学研究理事会的感觉功能分类对恢复情况进行分级,有意义的恢复定义为S3或更高水平。纳入了28名受试者的50例指神经损伤。有22名男性和6名女性受试者,平均年龄为45岁。3例患者有糖尿病病史,6例为现吸烟者。最常报告的损伤机制是锯伤(n = 13)、挤压伤(n = 9)、神经瘤切除(n = 9)、截肢/撕脱伤(n = 8)、锐器伤(n = 7)和爆炸/枪伤(n = 4)。平均缺损长度为35±8毫米(范围为25 - 50毫米)。86%的修复报告恢复到S3或更高水平。静态两点辨别觉(s2PD)和Semmes - Weinstein单丝检查(SWF)是最常见的完整评估方法。在报告了2PD数据的24例修复中,平均s2PD为9±4毫米。对于有SWF数据的38例修复,33例报告有保护性感觉,2例有深压觉,3例无恢复。这些数据与神经自体移植修复的历史数据相比具有优势,报告的有意义恢复水平为60%至88%。未报告有不良反应。处理过的神经同种异体移植物可用于重建手部的长间隙神经缺损,有意义的恢复率一直很高。指神经损伤间隙大于25毫米的PNA修复结果与神经自体移植修复的历史报告相比具有优势,但没有供区并发症。