Pennsylvania State University College of Nursing, University Park.
Department of Psychology, University of California-Riverside.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Jan 1;74(1):59-68. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx012.
The current analyses examined the impact of daily memory lapses on daily affect and whether this impact varied across age.
One hundred sixty-six adults (ages 20-79) completed assessments of memory lapses and affect each day for 7 consecutive days. Assessments included retrospective and prospective memory lapses as well as the impact of these lapses (how irritating, interfering, and consequential). Affect was assessed using ratings of daily positive and negative affect.
Participants reported memory lapses on 33.3% of days. Prospective lapses were consistently rated as more consequential. Regardless of age, participants had significantly lower in positive affect and significantly higher in negative affect on days with a prospective lapse. Effects of retrospective lapses depended on age: compared to older adults, younger adults reported lower positive affect on days with a retrospective lapse.
Previous work on daily memory lapses has focused on prospective lapses. Although retrospective lapses occurred more frequently in this sample, prospective lapses appeared to have a greater impact on daily experiences regardless of age. By measuring daily memory lapses and affect over consecutive days, we can begin to understand how the experience of forgetting impacts individuals at a micro-level.
本分析旨在探讨日常记忆失误对日常情绪的影响,以及这种影响是否因年龄而异。
166 名成年人(年龄 20-79 岁)连续 7 天每天完成记忆失误和情绪评估。评估包括回溯性和前瞻性记忆失误,以及这些失误的影响(多么令人烦恼、干扰和后果严重)。情绪通过每日积极和消极情绪的评分来评估。
参与者报告在 33.3%的日子里出现记忆失误。前瞻性失误始终被评为后果更严重。无论年龄大小,参与者在出现前瞻性失误的日子里,积极情绪明显较低,消极情绪明显较高。回溯性失误的影响取决于年龄:与老年人相比,年轻人在出现回溯性失误的日子里,积极情绪较低。
以前关于日常记忆失误的研究主要集中在前瞻性失误上。尽管在本样本中回溯性失误更为常见,但前瞻性失误似乎对日常体验的影响更大,无论年龄大小。通过连续多天测量日常记忆失误和情绪,我们可以开始了解遗忘体验如何在微观层面影响个体。