• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运动性认知风险综合征主观认知担忧的智能手机每日日记评估:一项初步研究

Daily Diary Smartphone Assessment of Subjective Cognitive Concerns in Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Nester Caroline O, García de la Garza Ángel, Mogle Jacqueline A, Wang Cuiling, Katz Mindy J, Ayers Emmeline, Lipton Richard B, Verghese Joe, Rabin Laura A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Graduate Center City University of New York New York New York USA.

Department of Psychology, Queens College City University of New York New York New York USA.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;8(7):e70744. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70744. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70744
PMID:40606310
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12215410/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR), a predementia condition that combines slow gait speed and subjective cognitive concerns (SCC), has broad diagnostic accessibility in resource poor settings as it is inexpensive and simple to diagnose. The ability to diagnose MCR remotely via smartphone would further increase the convenience and applicability of this syndrome. In this pilot study, we investigated the feasibility of implementing daily dairy reported SCC via smartphone in diverse individuals with MCR. Study aims included: (1) examine smartphone SCC to detect clinical status in MCR, (2) investigate the association of smartphone SCC with traditional in-clinic SCC measures; and (3) compare the relative ability of smartphone and in-clinic SCC to detect clinical status in MCR.

METHODS

Einstein Aging Study participants ( = 247, M = 77.49 ± 4.82, %female = 66, M = 15.18 ± 3.65, %non-Hispanic white = 47, %non-Hispanic black = 39) completed the daily memory lapses checklist via smartphone (14-day daily dairy assessment of in vivo experiences of SCC) and a traditional in-person assessment of SCC (the cognitive change index) at annual study visits. Gait assessment and MCR diagnosis were assigned at baseline in-person assessment (MCR,  = 36). Clinical status was determined through clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes. Linear mixed-effects models tested the association between smartphone based and in-person SCC measures with clinical status, controlling for covariates.

RESULTS

Smartphone and in-person SCC measures were highly correlated. We found significant associations between SCC and clinical status for both smartphone and in-person SCC measures in MCR. Linear mixed-effects models revealed similar associations between smartphone-based and in-person SCC with clinical status.

CONCLUSTION

Results represent a step toward viability of remote, smartphone-based assessment of SCC in MCR. Findings illustrate the merit of future research exploring a fully remote MCR diagnosis, with implications for dissemination of MCR in underserved, remote settings and more equitable access to early dementia detection in diverse populations.

摘要

背景与目的

运动认知风险综合征(MCR)是一种痴呆前状态,它结合了步态速度缓慢和主观认知问题(SCC),由于其诊断成本低廉且操作简单,在资源匮乏的环境中具有广泛的诊断可及性。通过智能手机远程诊断MCR将进一步提高该综合征的便利性和适用性。在这项试点研究中,我们调查了通过智能手机让患有MCR的不同个体每日报告SCC的可行性。研究目的包括:(1)检查智能手机SCC以检测MCR中的临床状态;(2)调查智能手机SCC与传统门诊SCC测量方法之间的关联;(3)比较智能手机SCC和门诊SCC检测MCR临床状态的相对能力。

方法

爱因斯坦衰老研究的参与者(n = 247,平均年龄M = 77.49 ± 4.82岁,女性占66%,平均教育年限M = 15.18 ± 3.65年,非西班牙裔白人占47%,非西班牙裔黑人占39%)通过智能手机完成每日记忆失误清单(对SCC的体内体验进行为期14天的每日记录评估),并在年度研究访视时进行传统的面对面SCC评估(认知变化指数)。在基线面对面评估时进行步态评估和MCR诊断(MCR患者,n = 36)。通过临床痴呆评定量表框分总和确定临床状态。线性混合效应模型测试了基于智能手机和面对面的SCC测量方法与临床状态之间的关联,并对协变量进行了控制。

结果

智能手机和面对面的SCC测量方法高度相关。我们发现,在MCR中,智能手机和面对面的SCC测量方法的SCC与临床状态之间均存在显著关联。线性混合效应模型显示,基于智能手机和面对面的SCC与临床状态之间的关联相似。

结论

研究结果朝着在MCR中通过智能手机进行远程SCC评估的可行性迈出了一步。研究结果说明了未来探索完全远程MCR诊断的研究价值,这对于在服务不足的偏远地区传播MCR以及不同人群更公平地获得早期痴呆检测具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c25/12215410/5f90241364d4/HSR2-8-e70744-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c25/12215410/a506b60a6ba5/HSR2-8-e70744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c25/12215410/5f90241364d4/HSR2-8-e70744-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c25/12215410/a506b60a6ba5/HSR2-8-e70744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c25/12215410/5f90241364d4/HSR2-8-e70744-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Daily Diary Smartphone Assessment of Subjective Cognitive Concerns in Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome: A Pilot Study.运动性认知风险综合征主观认知担忧的智能手机每日日记评估:一项初步研究
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;8(7):e70744. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70744. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
3
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
4
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.初级保健医生对有症状人群进行全因痴呆或认知障碍诊断的临床判断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.
5
Smartphone- and Tablet-Based Tools to Assess Cognition in Individuals With Preclinical Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Scoping Review.基于智能手机和平板电脑的工具用于评估临床前阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍个体的认知:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 27;27:e65297. doi: 10.2196/65297.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
"Cognitive" Criteria in Older Adults With Slow Gait Speed: Implications for Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome.步态速度缓慢的老年人的“认知”标准:对运动性认知风险综合征的影响
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Apr 1;79(4). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae038.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
Association between balance impairment and incidence of motoric cognitive risk syndrome in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.中国健康与养老追踪调查中平衡功能障碍与运动认知风险综合征发病率之间的关联
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 Mar;29(3):100476. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100476. Epub 2025 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital Neuropsychology beyond Computerized Cognitive Assessment: Applications of Novel Digital Technologies.超越计算机化认知评估的数字神经心理学:新型数字技术的应用
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Apr 24;39(3):290-304. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae016.
2
Does the Cognitive Change Index Predict Future Cognitive and Clinical Decline? Longitudinal Analysis in a Demographically Diverse Cohort.认知变化指数是否可预测未来的认知和临床衰退?在人口多样化队列中的纵向分析。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;98(1):319-332. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230752.
3
Smartphone-Based Gait Cadence to Identify Older Adults with Decreased Functional Capacity.
基于智能手机的步态节奏识别功能能力下降的老年人。
Digit Biomark. 2022 Jul 14;6(2):61-70. doi: 10.1159/000525344. eCollection 2022 May-Aug.
4
Feasibility and validity of ecological momentary cognitive testing among older adults with mild cognitive impairment.轻度认知障碍老年人中生态瞬时认知测试的可行性和有效性
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 5;4:946685. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.946685. eCollection 2022.
5
Validation of a "subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome" screening tool for motoric cognitive risk syndrome-A prospective cohort study.验证一种用于运动认知风险综合征的“主观运动认知风险综合征”筛查工具:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Oct;29(10):2925-2933. doi: 10.1111/ene.15476. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
6
Inequitable Access to Dementia Diagnosis and Care in Low-Resource Settings - A Global Perspective.资源匮乏地区痴呆症诊断与护理的不平等获取——全球视角
Clin Gerontol. 2023 Mar-Apr;46(2):133-137. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2054391. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
7
Measuring Memory Lapses and Their Impact on Daily Life: Results From Two Daily Diary Studies.测量记忆失误及其对日常生活的影响:两项日常日记研究的结果。
Assessment. 2023 Jul;30(5):1454-1466. doi: 10.1177/10731911221077962. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
8
Association of Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome with Cardiovascular and Noncardiovascular Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.运动性认知风险综合征与心血管及非心血管因素的关联:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 May;23(5):810-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.11.035. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
9
Gait and Balance Assessments using Smartphone Applications in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.使用智能手机应用程序评估帕金森病患者的步态和平衡:系统评价。
J Med Syst. 2021 Aug 15;45(9):87. doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01760-5.
10
Current advances in digital cognitive assessment for preclinical Alzheimer's disease.临床前阿尔茨海默病数字认知评估的当前进展
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021 Jul 20;13(1):e12217. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12217. eCollection 2021.