• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluation of methohexital as an alternative to propofol in a high volume outpatient pediatric sedation service.

作者信息

Jones Nicholas E, Kelleman Michael S, Simon Harold K, Stockwell Jana A, McCracken Courtney, Mallory Michael D, Kamat Pradip P

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1101-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.008
PMID:28330689
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Propofol is a preferred agent for many pediatric sedation providers because of its rapid onset and short duration of action. It allows for quick turn around times and enhanced throughput. Occasionally, intravenous (IV) methohexital (MHX), an ultra-short acting barbiturate is utilized instead of propofol.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the experience with MHX in a primarily propofol driven outpatient sedation program and to see if it serves as an acceptable alternative when propofol is not the preferred pharmacologic option.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review from 2012 to 2015 of patients receiving IV MHX as their primary sedation agent. Data collected included demographics, reason for methohexital use, dosing, type of procedure, success rate, adverse events (AE), duration of the procedure, and time to discharge.

RESULTS

Methohexital was used in 240 patient encounters. Median age was 4years (IQR 2-7), 71.8% were male, and 80.4% were ASA-PS I or II. Indications for MHX use: egg+soy/peanut allergy in 93 (38.8%) and mitochondrial disorder 9 (3.8%). Median induction bolus was 2.1mg/kg (IQR, 1.9-2.8), median maintenance infusion was 4.5mg/kg/h (IQR, 3.0-6.0). Hiccups 15 (6.3%), secretions requiring intervention 14 (5.8%), and cough 12 (5.0%) were the most commonly occurring minor AEs. Airway obstruction was seen in 28 (11.6%). Overall success rate was 94%. Median time to discharge after procedure completion was 40.5min (IQR 28-57).

CONCLUSION

Methohexital can be used with a high success rate and AEs that are not inconsistent with propofol administration. Methohexital should be considered when propofol is not a preferred option.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluation of methohexital as an alternative to propofol in a high volume outpatient pediatric sedation service.
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1101-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
2
Intravenous methohexital for brief sedation of pediatric oncology outpatients: physiologic and behavioral responses.静脉注射美索比妥用于儿科肿瘤门诊患者的短暂镇静:生理和行为反应
Pediatrics. 1997 May;99(5):E8. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.5.e8.
3
Brief unconscious sedation for painful pediatric oncology procedures. Intravenous methohexital with appropriate monitoring is safe and effective.
Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1993 Nov;15(4):370-6.
4
Comparison of propofol and methohexital continuous infusion techniques for conscious sedation.丙泊酚与美索比妥持续输注技术用于清醒镇静的比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Oct;56(10):1124-7; discussion 1127-8. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90749-2.
5
Comparison of recovery of propofol and methohexital sedation using an infusion pump.使用输液泵比较丙泊酚和甲己炔巴比妥镇静作用的恢复情况。
Anesth Prog. 1996 Winter;43(1):9-13.
6
The cost-effectiveness of methohexital versus propofol for sedation during monitored anesthesia care.在麻醉监测护理期间,美索比妥与丙泊酚用于镇静的成本效益比较。
Anesth Analg. 1999 Apr;88(4):723-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00005.
7
A Safety Comparison of Single-Agent Methohexital, Ketamine, or Propofol for Musculoskeletal Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department.在急诊科进行肌肉骨骼程序镇静时,单药甲己炔巴比妥、氯胺酮或异丙酚的安全性比较。
J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug;63(2):290-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.10.011. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
8
Experience with the use of propofol for radiologic imaging in infants younger than 6 months of age.6个月以下婴儿使用丙泊酚进行放射影像学检查的经验。
Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Jul;47(8):974-983. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3844-7. Epub 2017 May 9.
9
The safety of propofol sedation for elective nonintubated esophagogastroduodenoscopy in pediatric patients.丙泊酚镇静用于小儿择期非插管食管胃十二指肠镜检查的安全性。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;15(6):e261-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000147.
10
A prospective case series of pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department using single-syringe ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol).一项在急诊科使用单注射器氯胺酮-丙泊酚组合(氯胺酮)进行小儿程序镇静和镇痛的前瞻性病例系列研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;17(2):194-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00646.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The protective effect of the Rho-kinase inhibitor hydroxyfasudil on propofol-induced hippocampal neuron apoptosis in neonatal rats.Rho激酶抑制剂羟基法舒地尔对新生大鼠异丙酚诱导的海马神经元凋亡的保护作用。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018 Sep 1;11(9):4562-4570. eCollection 2018.