Suppr超能文献

每日随机给予160微克、320微克和640微克环索奈德治疗中度至重度哮喘

Control of moderate-to-severe asthma with randomized ciclesonide doses of 160, 320 and 640 μg/day.

作者信息

Pedersen Søren E, Prasad Niyati, Goehring Udo-Michael, Andersson Henrik, Postma Dirkje S

机构信息

Pediatric Research Unit, Kolding Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.

Vertex, Phase IV & Global Strategy, London, UK.

出版信息

J Asthma Allergy. 2017 Mar 7;10:35-46. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S111712. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The inhaled corticoteroid (ICS) ciclesonide (Cic), controls asthma symptoms in the majority of patients at the recommended dose of 160 µg/day. However, the relationship between the level of asthma control and increasing doses of Cic is unknown. This study investigated whether long-term treatment with higher doses of Cic would further improve asthma symptoms in patients with uncontrolled asthma despite ICS use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 367 patients were allocated to one of three treatment arms (Cic 160, 320 and 640 µg/day). After a single-blind, 3-week baseline period with Cic 160 µg/day, eligible patients were randomized to receive 52 weeks of treatment with Cic 160, 320 or 640 µg/day (double-blind period) during which forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV), exacerbations and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores were measured.

RESULTS

Treatment with all the three doses was associated with significant improvements in ACQ scores, FEV and asthma symptoms (<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the three doses. The results of the primary end point analysis showed a numerical improvement in the ACQ score with Cic 640 µg/day compared with Cic 160 µg/day (least square [LS] mean: -0.122; two-sided -value: 0.30). Post hoc subgroup analyses showed that the improvement in the ACQ score with Cic 640 µg/day compared with Cic 160 µg/day was statistically significant in subjects who experience at least one exacerbation per year (LS mean: -0.586; 95% confidence interval: -1.110, -0.062, =0.0285). Adverse events were low and consistent with the known safety profile of Cic.

CONCLUSION

In patients with persistent, uncontrolled asthma, increasing the Cic dose from 160 to 640 µg/day provided no clear additional effect. Patients who experience more than one exacerbation per year may benefit from higher doses; however, further studies are necessary to confirm this. All Cic doses were well tolerated.

摘要

背景

吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)环索奈德(Cic)以推荐剂量160μg/天可控制大多数患者的哮喘症状。然而,哮喘控制水平与Cic剂量增加之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究调查了对于尽管使用ICS但哮喘仍未得到控制的患者,长期使用更高剂量的Cic是否会进一步改善哮喘症状。

患者与方法

在一项双盲、随机、平行组研究中,367例患者被分配至三个治疗组之一(Cic 160、320和640μg/天)。在使用160μg/天Cic进行为期3周的单盲基线期后,符合条件的患者被随机分配接受52周的Cic 160、320或640μg/天治疗(双盲期),在此期间测量1秒用力呼气量(FEV)、急性加重次数和哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)评分。

结果

所有三种剂量的治疗均与ACQ评分、FEV和哮喘症状的显著改善相关(<0.01)。三种剂量之间无统计学显著差异。主要终点分析结果显示,与160μg/天的Cic相比,640μg/天的Cic在ACQ评分上有数值上的改善(最小二乘[LS]均值:-0.122;双侧P值:0.30)。事后亚组分析显示,与160μg/天的Cic相比,640μg/天的Cic在每年至少经历一次急性加重的受试者中,ACQ评分的改善具有统计学显著性(LS均值:-0.586;95%置信区间:-1.110,-0.062,P = 0.0285)。不良事件发生率低,且与Cic已知的安全性特征一致。

结论

在持续性、未控制的哮喘患者中,将Cic剂量从160μg/天增加到640μg/天没有明显的额外效果。每年经历一次以上急性加重的患者可能从更高剂量中获益;然而需要进一步研究来证实这一点。所有Cic剂量的耐受性都良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9911/5349703/4a60b9c03933/jaa-10-035Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验