Templar Alexander, Schofield Desmond M, Nesbeth Darren N
The Advanced Centre for Biochemical Engineering, Department of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Biomol Detect Quantif. 2016 Dec 29;11:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bdq.2016.12.001. eCollection 2017 Mar.
We measured the impact of the presence of total () cellular material on the performance of the Linear Regression of Efficiency (LRE) method of absolute quantitative PCR (LRE qPCR), which features the putatively universal CAL1 calibration reaction, which we propose as a synthetic biology standard. We firstly used a qPCR reaction in which a sequence present in the lone genomic BirA locus is amplified. Amplification efficiency for this reaction, a key metric for many quantitative qPCR methods, was inhibited by cellular material from bioreactor cultivation to a greater extent than material from shake flask cultivation. We then compared LRE qPCR to the Standard Curve method of absolute qPCR (SC qPCR). LRE qPCR method matched the performance of the SC qPCR when used to measure 417-4.17 × 10 copies of the BirA target sequence present in a shake flask-derived cell sonicates sample, and for 97-9.7 × 10 copies in the equivalent bioreactor-derived sample. A plasmid-encoded T7 bacteriophage sequence was next used to compare the methods. In the presence of cell sonicates from samples of up to OD = 160, LRE qPCR outperformed SC qPCR in the range of 1.54 × 10-1.54 × 10 copies of the T7 target sequence and matched SC qPCR over 1.54 × 10-1.54 × 10 copies. These data suggest the CAL1 standard, combined with the LRE qPCR method, represents an attractive choice as a synthetic biology qPCR standard that performs well even when unpurified industrial samples are used as the source of template material.
我们测量了总细胞物质的存在对绝对定量PCR(LRE qPCR)的效率线性回归(LRE)方法性能的影响,该方法具有假定通用的CAL1校准反应,我们将其作为合成生物学标准提出。我们首先使用了一种qPCR反应,其中对单独的基因组BirA位点中存在的序列进行扩增。该反应的扩增效率是许多定量qPCR方法的关键指标,与摇瓶培养的物质相比,来自生物反应器培养的细胞物质对其抑制作用更大。然后,我们将LRE qPCR与绝对qPCR的标准曲线法(SC qPCR)进行了比较。当用于测量摇瓶来源的细胞超声裂解物样品中存在的417 - 4.17×10拷贝的BirA靶序列时,LRE qPCR方法与SC qPCR的性能相当;对于等量的生物反应器来源的样品,在测量97 - 9.7×10拷贝时也是如此。接下来使用质粒编码的T7噬菌体序列对这些方法进行比较。在存在高达OD = 160的样品的细胞超声裂解物的情况下,对于1.54×10 - 1.54×10拷贝的T7靶序列,LRE qPCR的性能优于SC qPCR,而在超过1.54×10 - 1.54×10拷贝时与SC qPCR相当。这些数据表明,CAL1标准与LRE qPCR方法相结合,是一种有吸引力的合成生物学qPCR标准选择,即使将未纯化的工业样品用作模板材料来源时也能表现良好。