Templar Alexander, Woodhouse Stefan, Keshavarz-Moore Eli, Nesbeth Darren N
Department of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Bernard Katz Building, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Department of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Bernard Katz Building, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
J Microbiol Methods. 2016 Aug;127:111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 May 17.
Advances in synthetic genomics are now well underway in yeasts due to the low cost of synthetic DNA. These new capabilities also bring greater need for quantitating the presence, loss and rearrangement of loci within synthetic yeast genomes. Methods for achieving this will ideally; i) be robust to industrial settings, ii) adhere to a global standard and iii) be sufficiently rapid to enable at-line monitoring during cell growth. The methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris (P. pastoris) is increasingly used for industrial production of biotherapeutic proteins so we sought to answer the following questions for this particular yeast species. Is time-consuming DNA purification necessary to obtain accurate end-point polymerase chain reaction (e-pPCR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) data? Can the novel linear regression of efficiency qPCR method (LRE qPCR), which has properties desirable in a synthetic biology standard, match the accuracy of conventional qPCR? Does cell cultivation scale influence PCR performance? To answer these questions we performed e-pPCR and qPCR in the presence and absence of cellular material disrupted by a mild 30s sonication procedure. The e-pPCR limit of detection (LOD) for a genomic target locus was 50pg (4.91×10(3) copies) of purified genomic DNA (gDNA) but the presence of cellular material reduced this sensitivity sixfold to 300pg gDNA (2.95×10(4) copies). LRE qPCR matched the accuracy of a conventional standard curve qPCR method. The presence of material from bioreactor cultivation of up to OD600=80 did not significantly compromise the accuracy of LRE qPCR. We conclude that a simple and rapid cell disruption step is sufficient to render P. pastoris samples of up to OD600=80 amenable to analysis using LRE qPCR which we propose as a synthetic biology standard.
由于合成DNA成本低廉,酵母合成基因组学的进展目前正顺利推进。这些新能力也带来了对合成酵母基因组中基因座的存在、缺失和重排进行定量分析的更大需求。实现这一目标的方法理想情况下应具备以下几点:i)对工业环境具有稳健性;ii)遵循全球标准;iii)足够快速,以便在细胞生长过程中进行在线监测。甲基营养型酵母巴斯德毕赤酵母(P. pastoris)越来越多地用于生物治疗蛋白的工业生产,因此我们针对这种特定酵母物种试图回答以下问题。为了获得准确的终点聚合酶链反应(e-pPCR)和定量PCR(qPCR)数据,是否需要耗时的DNA纯化?具有合成生物学标准中理想特性的新型效率qPCR线性回归方法(LRE qPCR)能否与传统qPCR的准确性相匹配?细胞培养规模是否会影响PCR性能?为了回答这些问题,我们在存在和不存在通过温和的30秒超声处理破坏的细胞材料的情况下进行了e-pPCR和qPCR。基因组目标基因座的e-pPCR检测限(LOD)为50pg(4.91×10³个拷贝)纯化的基因组DNA(gDNA),但细胞材料的存在使这种灵敏度降低了六倍,降至300pg gDNA(2.95×10⁴个拷贝)。LRE qPCR与传统标准曲线qPCR方法的准确性相匹配。来自生物反应器培养物、高达OD600 = 80的材料的存在并未显著损害LRE qPCR的准确性。我们得出结论,一个简单快速的细胞破碎步骤足以使高达OD600 = 80的毕赤酵母样品适用于使用LRE qPCR进行分析,我们提议将LRE qPCR作为一种合成生物学标准。