Kim Daniel Seung, Burt Amber A, Ranchalis Jane E, Wilmot Beth, Smith Joshua D, Patterson Karynne E, Coe Bradley P, Li Yatong K, Bamshad Michael J, Nikolas Molly, Eichler Evan E, Swanson James M, Nigg Joel T, Nickerson Deborah A, Jarvik Gail P
Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Center for Statistical Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2017 Jun;174(4):381-389. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32527. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has high heritability; however, studies of common variation account for <5% of ADHD variance. Using data from affected participants without a family history of ADHD, we sought to identify de novo variants that could account for sporadic ADHD. Considering a total of 128 families, two analyses were conducted in parallel: first, in 11 unaffected parent/affected proband trios (or quads with the addition of an unaffected sibling) we completed exome sequencing. Six de novo missense variants at highly conserved bases were identified and validated from four of the 11 families: the brain-expressed genes TBC1D9, DAGLA, QARS, CSMD2, TRPM2, and WDR83. Separately, in 117 unrelated probands with sporadic ADHD, we sequenced a panel of 26 genes implicated in intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to evaluate whether variation in ASD/ID-associated genes were also present in participants with ADHD. Only one putative deleterious variant (Gln600STOP) in CHD1L was identified; this was found in a single proband. Notably, no other nonsense, splice, frameshift, or highly conserved missense variants in the 26 gene panel were identified and validated. These data suggest that de novo variant analysis in families with independently adjudicated sporadic ADHD diagnosis can identify novel genes implicated in ADHD pathogenesis. Moreover, that only one of the 128 cases (0.8%, 11 exome, and 117 MIP sequenced participants) had putative deleterious variants within our data in 26 genes related to ID and ASD suggests significant independence in the genetic pathogenesis of ADHD as compared to ASD and ID phenotypes. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)具有较高的遗传度;然而,常见变异研究仅解释了ADHD变异的不到5%。我们利用无ADHD家族史的患病参与者的数据,试图识别可能导致散发性ADHD的新生变异。考虑到总共128个家庭,我们并行进行了两项分析:首先,在11个未患病的父母/患病先证者三联体(或加上一个未患病同胞的四联体)中,我们完成了外显子组测序。从11个家庭中的4个家庭中鉴定并验证了6个位于高度保守碱基处的新生错义变异:脑表达基因TBC1D9、DAGLA、QARS、CSMD2、TRPM2和WDR83。另外,在117名散发性ADHD的无亲缘关系先证者中,我们对一组与智力残疾(ID)和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)相关的26个基因进行了测序,以评估ADHD参与者中是否也存在ASD/ID相关基因的变异。仅在CHD1L中鉴定出一个推定的有害变异(Gln600STOP);这一变异仅在一名先证者中发现。值得注意的是,在26个基因组成的面板中未鉴定和验证其他无义、剪接、移码或高度保守的错义变异。这些数据表明,对独立判定为散发性ADHD诊断的家庭进行新生变异分析,可以识别出与ADHD发病机制相关的新基因。此外,在我们的数据中,128例病例中只有1例(0.8%,11例进行外显子组测序,117例进行MIP测序的参与者)在与ID和ASD相关的26个基因中存在推定的有害变异,这表明与ASD和ID表型相比,ADHD的遗传发病机制具有显著的独立性。©2017威利期刊公司