Suppr超能文献

在 deceased 供体肾移植中预测移植物存活所需的新供体分层方法 。 (注:deceased 一般指已故的、去世的,这里结合语境可理解为已故供体,但原英文表述不太符合医学专业文献准确规范表述习惯,可能完整准确的应该是“deceased donor”,即已故供体 )

The Need for New Donor Stratification to Predict Graft Survival in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.

作者信息

Yang Shin Seok, Yang Jaeseok, Ahn Curie, Min Sang Il, Ha Jongwon, Kim Sung Joo, Park Jae Berm

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

Transplantation Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2017 May;58(3):626-630. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.3.626.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine whether stratification of deceased donors by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) criteria negatively impacts graft survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed deceased donor and recipient pretransplant variables of kidney transplantations that occurred between February 1995 and December 2009. We compared clinical outcomes between standard criteria donors (SCDs) and expanded criteria donors (ECDs).

RESULTS

The deceased donors consisted of 369 patients. A total of 494 transplant recipients were enrolled in this study. Mean age was 41.7±11.4 year (range 18-69) and 273 patients (55.4%) were male. Mean duration of follow-up was 8.8±4.9 years. The recipients from ECD kidneys were 63 patients (12.8%). The overall mean cold ischemia time was 5.7±3.2 hours. Estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1, 2, and 3 years after transplantation were significantly lower in ECD transplants (1 year, 62.2±17.6 vs. 51.0±16.4, p<0.001; 2 year, 62.2±17.6 vs. 51.0±16.4, p=0.001; 3 year, 60.9±23.5 vs. 54.1±18.7, p=0.047). In multivariate analysis, donor age (≥40 years) was an independent risk factor for graft failure. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, there was no significant difference in death-censored graft survival (Log rank test, p>0.05), although patient survival was lower in ECDs than SCDs (Log rank test, p=0.011).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that stratification by the UNOS criteria does not predict graft survival. In order to expand the donor pool, new criteria for standard/expanded donors need to be modified by regional differences.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定器官共享联合网络(UNOS)标准对已故供体进行分层是否会对移植物存活产生负面影响。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了1995年2月至2009年12月期间进行肾移植的已故供体和受体移植前变量。我们比较了标准标准供体(SCD)和扩大标准供体(ECD)之间的临床结果。

结果

已故供体包括369例患者。本研究共纳入494例移植受者。平均年龄为41.7±11.4岁(范围18 - 69岁),273例患者(55.4%)为男性。平均随访时间为8.8±4.9年。接受ECD肾移植的受者有63例(12.8%)。总体平均冷缺血时间为5.7±3.2小时。ECD移植受者术后1年、2年和3年的估计肾小球滤过率显著低于SCD移植受者(1年,62.2±17.6对51.0±16.4,p<0.001;2年,62.2±17.6对51.0±16.4,p = 0.001;3年,60.9±23.5对54.1±18.7,p = 0.047)。多因素分析显示,供体年龄(≥40岁)是移植物失败的独立危险因素。在Kaplan-Meier分析中,死亡删失的移植物存活无显著差异(对数秩检验,p>0.05),尽管ECD受者的患者存活低于SCD受者(对数秩检验,p = 0.011)。

结论

我们的数据表明,UNOS标准分层不能预测移植物存活。为了扩大供体库,需要根据地区差异修改标准/扩大供体的新标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb02/5368150/a6fed1ebad54/ymj-58-626-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验