Wang Yingling, Ni Tianjun, Yuan Jianmei, Wang Chunfeng, Liu Guoguang
Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Probes, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, China E-mail:
School of Environment, Henan Normal University, Henan Key Laboratory for Environmental Pollution Control, Key Laboratory for Yellow River and Huaihe River Water Environment and Pollution Control, Ministry of Education, Xinxiang 453007, China.
Water Sci Technol. 2017 Mar;75(5-6):1342-1350. doi: 10.2166/wst.2016.601.
The potential reaction of diclofenac (DCF) with ferrate(VI) and influences of coexisting surfactants have not been investigated in depth, and are the focus of this study. The results demonstrated that DCF reacted effectively and rapidly with Fe(VI) and approximately 75% of DCF (0.03 mM) was removed by excess Fe(VI) (0.45 mM) within 10 min. All of the reactions followed pseudo first-order kinetics with respect to DCF and Fe(VI), where the apparent second-order rate constant (k) was 5.07 M s at pH 9.0. Furthermore, the degradation efficiencies of DCF were clearly dependent on the concentrations of dissolved organic matter additives in the substrate solution. Primarily, inhibitory effects were observed with the samples that contained anionic (sodium dodecyl-benzene sulfonate, SDBS) or non-ionic (Tween-80) surfactants, which have been attributed to the side reactions between Fe(VI) and surfactants, which led to a reduction in the available oxidant for DCF destruction. Furthermore, the addition of a cationic surfactant (cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide, CTAB) and humic acid (HA) conveyed significantly promotional effects on the DCF-Fe(VI) reaction. The rate enhancement effect for CTAB might be due to micellar surface catalysis, through the Coulomb attraction between the reactants and positively charged surfactants, while the catalytic action for HA resulted from the additional oxidation of Fe(V)/Fe(IV) in the presence of HA. The results provided the basic knowledge required to understand the environmental relevance of DCF oxidation via Fe(VI) in the presence of surfactant additives.
双氯芬酸(DCF)与高铁酸盐(VI)的潜在反应以及共存表面活性剂的影响尚未得到深入研究,这也是本研究的重点。结果表明,DCF与Fe(VI)能有效且快速地反应,在10分钟内,过量的Fe(VI)(0.45 mM)能去除约75%的DCF(0.03 mM)。所有反应对DCF和Fe(VI)均遵循准一级动力学,在pH 9.0时,表观二级反应速率常数(k)为5.07 M⁻¹s⁻¹。此外,DCF的降解效率明显取决于底物溶液中溶解有机物添加剂的浓度。主要观察到,含有阴离子(十二烷基苯磺酸钠,SDBS)或非离子(吐温80)表面活性剂的样品有抑制作用,这归因于Fe(VI)与表面活性剂之间的副反应,导致用于破坏DCF的有效氧化剂减少。此外,添加阳离子表面活性剂(十六烷基三甲基溴化铵,CTAB)和腐殖酸(HA)对DCF-Fe(VI)反应有显著的促进作用。CTAB的速率增强效应可能是由于胶束表面催化,通过反应物与带正电表面活性剂之间的库仑吸引,而HA的催化作用是由于在HA存在下Fe(V)/Fe(IV)的额外氧化。这些结果提供了理解在表面活性剂添加剂存在下通过Fe(VI)氧化DCF的环境相关性所需的基础知识。