Blake L, Carone N, Raffanello E, Slutsky Jenna, Ehrhardt A A, Golombok S
Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, Rome, Italy.
Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):860-867. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex026.
Why do gay men choose to start their families through surrogacy?
Most fathers chose surrogacy because they considered adoption to be a less desirable and/or accessible path to parenthood.
Little is known of gay fathers' motivations to use surrogacy as a path to parenthood over and above other forms of family building, such as adoption, and no studies have examined fathers' satisfaction with the surrogacy process.
STUDY DESIGN SIZE, DURATION: This study used a cross-sectional design as part of a larger investigation of parent-child relationships and child adjustment in 40 gay father surrogacy families. Multiple strategies (e.g. surrogacy agencies, social events and snowballing) were used to recruit as diverse a sample as possible. Data were obtained from 74 fathers (in 6 families only 1 father was available for interview).
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHOD: Semi-structured interviews, lasting ~1 h, were conducted in the family home (65%) or over Skype (35%) with 74 gay fathers (35 genetic fathers, 32 non-genetic fathers and 7 fathers who did not know or did not disclose who the genetic father was), when the children were 3-9 years old.
Genetic and non-genetic fathers were just as likely to want to become parents and had similar motivations for choosing surrogacy as a path to parenthood. Most fathers (N = 55, 74%) were satisfied with surrogacy and were satisfied (N = 31. 42%) or had neutral feelings (N = 21, 28%) about their choice of who would be the genetic father. Most fathers received supportive reactions to their decision to use surrogacy from both families of origin (e.g. parents, siblings) (N = 47, 64%) and from friends (N = 63, 85%).
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although diverse recruitment strategies were used, data were obtained from a volunteer sample. Therefore, the possibility that fathers who had a positive surrogacy experience may have been more likely to participate in the study, and therefore introduce bias, cannot be ruled out. Due to the high average annual income of the fathers in the study, findings may not generalize to gay fathers with lower incomes.
It is often assumed that parents' primary motivation for using ART is to have a genetic connection to the child. This study revealed that whilst genetic fatherhood was important for some gay fathers in surrogacy families, it was not important for all. This information will be of use to surrogacy agencies and organizations supporting men who are considering the different routes to parenthood.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust [097857/Z/11/Z] and the Jacob's Foundation. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.
N/A.
男同性恋者为何选择通过代孕组建家庭?
大多数父亲选择代孕是因为他们认为收养是一条不太理想且/或难以实现的成为父母的途径。
对于男同性恋父亲选择代孕而非其他组建家庭的方式(如收养)来成为父母的动机,我们了解甚少,且尚无研究调查父亲们对代孕过程的满意度。
研究设计、规模、时长:本研究采用横断面设计,作为对40个男同性恋父亲代孕家庭中亲子关系及儿童适应情况进行的一项更大规模调查的一部分。采用了多种策略(如代孕机构、社交活动和滚雪球抽样法)来尽可能广泛地招募样本。数据来自74位父亲(在6个家庭中仅有1位父亲可供访谈)。
参与者/材料、地点、方法:在孩子3至9岁时,在家庭住所(65%)或通过Skype(35%)对74位男同性恋父亲(35位遗传父亲、32位非遗传父亲以及7位不知道或未透露谁是遗传父亲的父亲)进行了时长约1小时的半结构化访谈。
遗传父亲和非遗传父亲想要成为父母的可能性相同,且选择代孕作为成为父母途径的动机相似。大多数父亲(N = 55,74%)对代孕感到满意,并且对选择谁作为遗传父亲感到满意(N = 31,42%)或持中立态度(N = 21,28%)。大多数父亲在决定使用代孕这件事上,从原生家庭(如父母、兄弟姐妹)(N = 47,64%)和朋友(N = 63,85%)那里得到了支持性的反应。
局限性、谨慎的原因:尽管采用了多种招募策略,但数据来自一个自愿参与的样本。因此,不能排除有过积极代孕经历的父亲更有可能参与研究从而引入偏差的可能性。由于研究中父亲们的平均年收入较高,研究结果可能不适用于收入较低的男同性恋父亲。
人们通常认为父母使用辅助生殖技术的主要动机是与孩子有基因联系。这项研究表明,虽然基因上的父权对于一些代孕家庭中的男同性恋父亲很重要,但并非对所有人都重要。这些信息将对代孕机构以及支持考虑不同成为父母途径的男性的组织有用。
研究资金/利益冲突:这项工作由惠康信托基金[097857/Z/11/Z]和雅各布基金会资助。作者均无利益冲突需要声明。
无。