Hallewell J, Alexander T, Reuter T, Stanford K
Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, Lethbridge Research Center, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4P4.
Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Agriculture Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4V6 (ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8784-0042 [K.S.]).
J Food Prot. 2017 Apr;80(4):598-603. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-427.
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains are foodborne pathogens that negatively impact human health and compromise food safety. Serogroup O157 is the most frequently isolated and studied STEC serogroup, but six others (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145) have also been identified as significant sources of human disease and collectively have been referred to as the "top six" pathogenic serogroups. Because detection methods for non-O157 serogroups are not yet refined, the objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of immunomagnetic separation (IMS) for recovery of serogroup O157 isolates with that for each of the top six E. coli serogroups in pure and mixed cultures of STEC at 10 to 10 CFU/mL. After serogroup-specific IMS, DNA was extracted from cultured isolates to analyze the specificity of each IMS assay using conventional and quantitative PCR. In pure cultures, DNA copy number obtained after IMS was lower for O111 and O157 (P < 0.01) than for other serogroups. Based on quantitative PCR (qPCR) analyses, specificity was reduced for all IMS assays when STEC isolates were mixed at 7 log CFU/mL, although the O157 IMS assays recovered only O157 over a wider range of concentrations than did assays for non-O157 serogroups. At the lowest dilution tested, conventional PCR was specific for all serogroups except O121 and O145. For these two serogroups, no dilution tested recovered only O121 or O145 when evaluated with conventional PCR. Refinements to IMS assays, development of selective media, and determination of optimal enrichment times to reduce background microflora or competition among serogroups would be especially beneficial for recovery of O111, O121, and O145 serogroups to improve STEC detection and isolation.
产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)菌株是食源性病原体,会对人类健康产生负面影响并危害食品安全。血清型O157是最常分离和研究的STEC血清型,但其他六种(O26、O45、O103、O111、O121和O145)也已被确认为人类疾病的重要来源,并统称为“六大”致病血清型。由于非O157血清型的检测方法尚未完善,本研究的目的是比较免疫磁珠分离(IMS)在10至10 CFU/mL的STEC纯培养物和混合培养物中回收O157血清型分离株与六大大肠杆菌血清型中每种血清型分离株的有效性。在进行血清型特异性IMS后,从培养的分离株中提取DNA,使用常规PCR和定量PCR分析每种IMS检测的特异性。在纯培养物中,IMS后获得的O111和O157的DNA拷贝数低于其他血清型(P < 0.01)。基于定量PCR(qPCR)分析,当STEC分离株以7 log CFU/mL混合时,所有IMS检测的特异性均降低,尽管O157 IMS检测在比非O157血清型检测更宽的浓度范围内仅回收O157。在测试的最低稀释度下,常规PCR对除O121和O145之外的所有血清型均具有特异性。对于这两种血清型,在使用常规PCR评估时,测试的任何稀释度都不能仅回收O121或O145。改进IMS检测、开发选择性培养基以及确定减少背景微生物群或血清型间竞争的最佳富集时间,对于回收O111、O121和O145血清型以改善STEC的检测和分离将特别有益。