NephroCare Tassin-Charcot, Sainte Foy Les Lyon, France.
Blood Purif. 2017;44(2):89-97. doi: 10.1159/000464346. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
Several studies report that fluid removal rate (FRR) above 10-13 mL/h/kg is associated with increased mortality in haemodialysis (HD) patients.
The aims of this study are to assess the influence of moderate FRR on survival in a cohort of prevalent dialysis patients with various dialysis session times and to challenge the FRR thresholds associated with increased mortality risk reported previously.
Interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and FRR (calculated from ultrafiltration [UF], target weight, and session time prescriptions) were studied in 190 prevalent dialysis patients (female: 42%, mean age: 69.5 years, median vintage: 40.2 months, diabetes: 34.7%, loop diuretic prescription: 5.8%) and averaged during the final quarter of 2010. Patient survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox-multivariate analyses.
The median IDWG, median session time, and median FRR were 2.33 kg (-0.54-4.57), 5.0 h (3.9-8.0 h), 6.8 mL/h/kg (1.3-16.7), respectively, and FRR was ≥10 mL/h/kg in 11.6% of the patients. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed decreased patient survival when the FRR was above the median (6.8 mL/h/kg; p = 0.012). The FRR was found to be independently associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.15 [95% CI 1.02-1.29]; p = 0.027) using stepwise Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, including age, vintage, gender, body mass index (BMI), serum albumin level, β2-microglobulin level, cardiovascular and diabetes history, and session time. Online haemodiafiltration did not change this result. The role of residual renal function was unlikely because 74% of the patients had a vintage of >18 months, a minority (5.8%) were prescribed loop diuretics (a surrogate of significant urine output) and β2-microglobulin level was not different in patients who were below or above the FRR median.
We concluded that the FRR threshold above which there is an increased mortality is lower than what has been reported (7.8 mL/h/kg). It raises the question of the hazard of fluid removal and intermittence of standard HD.
多项研究表明,血液透析(HD)患者的液体清除率(FRR)超过 10-13 mL/h/kg 与死亡率增加相关。
本研究旨在评估在不同透析治疗时间的透析患者队列中,适度 FRR 对生存的影响,并对先前报道的与死亡率增加风险相关的 FRR 阈值提出质疑。
研究了 190 名透析患者的透析间体重增加(IDWG)和 FRR(根据超滤量[UF]、目标体重和透析时间处方计算),并在 2010 年最后一个季度进行了平均计算。使用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 多变量分析评估患者的生存情况。
中位 IDWG、中位透析时间和中位 FRR 分别为 2.33 kg(-0.54-4.57)、5.0 h(3.9-8.0 h)和 6.8 mL/h/kg(1.3-16.7),11.6%的患者 FRR 超过 10 mL/h/kg。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,当 FRR 高于中位数(6.8 mL/h/kg)时,患者的生存率降低(p=0.012)。逐步 Cox 比例风险回归分析显示,FRR 与死亡率增加独立相关(危险比 1.15[95%CI 1.02-1.29];p=0.027),包括年龄、使用时间、性别、体重指数(BMI)、血清白蛋白水平、β2-微球蛋白水平、心血管和糖尿病病史以及透析时间。在线血液透析滤过并不能改变这一结果。残余肾功能的作用不太可能,因为 74%的患者使用时间超过 18 个月,少数(5.8%)患者服用了噻嗪类利尿剂(大量尿液产生的替代物),且 FRR 中位数以下和以上患者的β2-微球蛋白水平没有差异。
我们得出结论,死亡率增加的 FRR 阈值低于先前报道的(7.8 mL/h/kg)。这提出了关于液体清除和标准 HD 间歇性的风险问题。