Minami Daisuke, Takigawa Nagio, Kano Hirohisa, Ninomiya Takashi, Kubo Toshio, Ichihara Eiki, Ohashi Kadoaki, Sato Akiko, Hotta Katsuyuki, Tabata Masahiro, Tanimoto Mitsune, Kiura Katsuyuki
Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama.
Department of General Internal Medicine 4, Kawasaki Medical School,Okayama, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 1;47(5):434-437. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyx022.
Although endobronchial intubation during a bronchoscopic examination is useful for invasive procedures, it is not routine practice in Japan. The present study evaluated discomfort due to endobronchial intubation using fentanyl and midazolam sedation during bronchoscopy.
Thirty-nine patients were enrolled prospectively from November 2014 to September 2015 at Okayama University Hospital. Fentanyl (20 µg) was administered to the patients just before endobronchial intubation, and fentanyl (10 µg) and midazolam (1 mg) were added as needed during the procedure. A questionnaire survey was administered 2 h after the examination. In the questionnaire, patient satisfaction was scored using a visual analog scale as follows: excellent (1 point), good (2 points), normal (3 points), uncomfortable (4 points) and very uncomfortable (5 points). An additional question ('Do you remember the bronchoscopic examination?') was also asked. Predefined parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and complications) were recorded.
The enrolled patients included 22 males and 17 females; their median age was 70 (range: 28-88) years. The patients received a mean dose of 47.9 µg of fentanyl (range: 30-90 µg) and 2.79 mg of midazolam (range: 1-7 mg). In total, 28 patients (71.7%) agreed to undergo a second bronchoscopic examination; the mean levels of discomfort and for the re-examination were 2.07 points each. About 41% of the patients remembered the bronchoscopic examination. No severe complications were reported.
Endobronchial intubation using fentanyl and midazolam sedation during an invasive bronchoscopic procedure might be recommended.
UMIN000015578 in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry.
尽管支气管镜检查期间的支气管内插管对于侵入性操作很有用,但在日本并非常规做法。本研究评估了在支气管镜检查期间使用芬太尼和咪达唑仑镇静进行支气管内插管引起的不适。
2014年11月至2015年9月,在冈山大学医院前瞻性纳入39例患者。在支气管内插管前即刻给患者注射芬太尼(20μg),并在操作过程中根据需要追加芬太尼(10μg)和咪达唑仑(1mg)。检查后2小时进行问卷调查。在问卷中,使用视觉模拟量表对患者满意度进行评分如下:优秀(1分)、良好(2分)、正常(3分)、不舒服(4分)和非常不舒服(5分)。还询问了一个附加问题(“你还记得支气管镜检查吗?”)。记录预设参数(血压、心率、血氧饱和度和并发症)。
纳入的患者包括22名男性和17名女性;他们的年龄中位数为70岁(范围:28 - 88岁)。患者接受的芬太尼平均剂量为47.9μg(范围:30 - 90μg),咪达唑仑平均剂量为2.79mg(范围:1 - 7mg)。总共有28名患者(71.7%)同意接受第二次支气管镜检查;再次检查时不适的平均程度均为2.07分。约41%的患者记得支气管镜检查。未报告严重并发症。
在侵入性支气管镜检查过程中,使用芬太尼和咪达唑仑镇静进行支气管内插管可能是可取的。
UMIN临床试验注册中心的UMIN000015578 。