Smith A, Tatum F M, Muster P, Burch M K, Morgan W T
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans 70112.
J Biol Chem. 1988 Apr 15;263(11):5224-9.
Hemopexin alters conformation upon binding heme as shown by circular dichroism (CD), but hemopexin binds the heme analog, iron-meso-tetra-(4-sulfonatophenyl)-porphine (FeTPPS), without undergoing concomitant changes in its CD spectrum. Moreover, FeTPPS, unlike heme, does not increase the compactness of the heme-binding domain (I) of hemopexin shown by an increased sedimentation rate in sucrose gradients. On the other hand, like heme, FeTPPS forms a bishistidyl coordination complex with hemopexin and upon binding protects hemopexin from cleavage by plasmin. Competitive inhibition and saturation studies demonstrate that FeTPPS-hemopexin binds to the hemopexin receptor on mouse hepatoma cells but with a lower affinity (Kd 125 nM) more characteristic of apo-hemopexin than heme-hemopexin (Kd 65 nM). This provides evidence that conformational changes produced in hemopexin upon binding heme, but not upon binding FeTPPS, are important for increasing the affinity of hemopexin for its receptor. The amount of cell-associated radiolabel from 55FeTPPS-hemopexin increases linearly for up to 90 min but at a rate only about a third of that of the mesoheme-complex. As expected from the recycling of hemopexin, more iron-tetrapyrrole than protein is associated with the Hepa cells, but the ratio of 55Fe-ligand to 125I-hemopexin is only 2:1 for FeTPPS-hemopexin compared to 4:1 for mesoheme complexes. [55Fe]Mesoheme was associated at 5 min with lower density fractions containing plasma membranes and at 30 min with fractions containing higher density intracellular compartments. In contrast, 55FeTPPS was found associated with plasma membrane fractions at both times and was not transported into the cell. Although FeTPPS-hemopexin binds to the receptor, subsequent events of heme transport are impaired. The results indicate that upon binding heme at least three types of conformational changes occur in hemopexin which have important roles in receptor recognition and that the nature of the ligand influences subsequent heme transport.
如圆二色性(CD)所示,血红素结合蛋白在结合血红素后会改变构象,但血红素结合蛋白结合血红素类似物铁-中-四-(4-磺基苯基)-卟啉(FeTPPS)时,其CD光谱并未发生相应变化。此外,与血红素不同,FeTPPS不会通过蔗糖梯度中沉降速率的增加来显示增加血红素结合蛋白血红素结合结构域(I)的紧密性。另一方面,与血红素一样,FeTPPS与血红素结合蛋白形成双组氨酸配位复合物,结合后可保护血红素结合蛋白不被纤溶酶裂解。竞争性抑制和饱和研究表明,FeTPPS-血红素结合蛋白与小鼠肝癌细胞上的血红素结合蛋白受体结合,但亲和力较低(Kd为125 nM),更具有脱辅基血红素结合蛋白而非血红素-血红素结合蛋白的特征(Kd为65 nM)。这提供了证据,表明血红素结合蛋白结合血红素而非FeTPPS时产生的构象变化对于增加血红素结合蛋白对其受体的亲和力很重要。来自55FeTPPS-血红素结合蛋白的细胞相关放射性标记量在长达90分钟内呈线性增加,但速率仅约为中血红素复合物的三分之一。正如从血红素结合蛋白的循环利用所预期的那样,与Hepa细胞相关的铁四吡咯比蛋白质更多,但FeTPPS-血红素结合蛋白的55Fe-配体与125I-血红素结合蛋白的比例仅为2:1,而中血红素复合物为4:1。[55Fe]中血红素在5分钟时与含有质膜的较低密度级分相关,在30分钟时与含有较高密度细胞内区室的级分相关。相比之下,55FeTPPS在两个时间点均与质膜级分相关,且未被转运到细胞内。尽管FeTPPS-血红素结合蛋白与受体结合,但随后的血红素转运事件受损。结果表明,血红素结合蛋白在结合血红素时至少会发生三种类型的构象变化,这些变化在受体识别中起重要作用,并且配体的性质会影响随后的血红素转运。