• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与温室气体减排相关的健康协同效益认知:对中国三个城市居民的一项调查

Perceptions of Health Co-Benefits in Relation to Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions: A Survey among Urban Residents in Three Chinese Cities.

作者信息

Gao Jinghong, Xu Guozhang, Ma Wenjun, Zhang Yong, Woodward Alistair, Vardoulakis Sotiris, Kovats Sari, Wilkinson Paul, He Tianfeng, Lin Hualiang, Liu Tao, Gu Shaohua, Wang Jun, Li Jing, Yang Jun, Liu Xiaobo, Li Jing, Wu Haixia, Liu Qiyong

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.

Ningbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo 315010, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 13;14(3):298. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030298.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph14030298
PMID:28335404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5369134/
Abstract

Limited information is available on the perceptions of stakeholders concerning the health co-benefits of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the perceptions of urban residents on the health co-benefits involving GHG abatement and related influencing factors in three cities in China. Beijing, Ningbo and Guangzhou were selected for this survey. Participants were recruited from randomly chosen committees, following quotas for gender and age in proportion to the respective population shares. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were employed to examine the associations between socio-demographic variables and individuals' perceptions of the health co-benefits related to GHG mitigation. Unconditional logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the influencing factors of respondents' awareness about the health co-benefits. A total of 1159 participants were included in the final analysis, of which 15.9% reported that they were familiar with the health co-benefits of GHG emission reductions. Those who were younger, more educated, with higher family income, and with registered urban residence, were more likely to be aware of health co-benefits. Age, attitudes toward air pollution and governmental efforts to improve air quality, suffering from respiratory diseases, and following low carbon lifestyles are significant predictors of respondents' perceptions on the health co-benefits. These findings may not only provide information to policy-makers to develop and implement public welcome policies of GHG mitigation, but also help to bridge the gap between GHG mitigation measures and public engagement as well as willingness to change health-related behaviors.

摘要

关于利益相关者对温室气体(GHG)减排的健康协同效益的看法,现有信息有限。本研究的目的是调查中国三个城市的城市居民对涉及温室气体减排的健康协同效益及其相关影响因素的看法。本调查选取了北京、宁波和广州。参与者从随机选择的社区招募,按照性别和年龄配额,使其与各自的人口比例相符。采用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验来考察社会人口统计学变量与个人对与温室气体减排相关的健康协同效益的看法之间的关联。进行无条件逻辑回归分析以调查受访者对健康协同效益认知的影响因素。最终分析共纳入1159名参与者,其中15.9%的人表示他们熟悉温室气体减排的健康协同效益。年龄较小、受教育程度较高、家庭收入较高以及具有城市户籍的人更有可能知晓健康协同效益。年龄、对空气污染的态度和政府改善空气质量的努力、患有呼吸系统疾病以及遵循低碳生活方式是受访者对健康协同效益看法的重要预测因素。这些发现不仅可为政策制定者制定和实施受公众欢迎的温室气体减排政策提供信息,还有助于弥合温室气体减排措施与公众参与以及改变与健康相关行为的意愿之间的差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4034/5369134/a22b41605cab/ijerph-14-00298-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4034/5369134/6b7a96d271bc/ijerph-14-00298-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4034/5369134/103aacd8f58f/ijerph-14-00298-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4034/5369134/c07cc75f3a22/ijerph-14-00298-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4034/5369134/a22b41605cab/ijerph-14-00298-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4034/5369134/6b7a96d271bc/ijerph-14-00298-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4034/5369134/103aacd8f58f/ijerph-14-00298-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4034/5369134/c07cc75f3a22/ijerph-14-00298-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4034/5369134/a22b41605cab/ijerph-14-00298-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of Health Co-Benefits in Relation to Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions: A Survey among Urban Residents in Three Chinese Cities.与温室气体减排相关的健康协同效益认知:对中国三个城市居民的一项调查
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 13;14(3):298. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030298.
2
[Awareness of health co-benefits of carbon emissions reduction in urban residents in Beijing: a cross-sectional survey].
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2017 May 10;38(5):621-624. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.05.012.
3
Greenhouse gas emissions reduction in different economic sectors: Mitigation measures, health co-benefits, knowledge gaps, and policy implications.不同经济部门的温室气体减排:缓解措施、健康协同效益、知识差距和政策影响。
Environ Pollut. 2018 Sep;240:683-698. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 26.
4
Carbon trading, co-pollutants, and environmental equity: Evidence from California's cap-and-trade program (2011-2015).碳交易、共同污染物与环境公平:来自加利福尼亚州总量管制与排放交易计划的证据(2011-2015 年)。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 10;15(7):e1002604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002604. eCollection 2018 Jul.
5
Public willingness to pay for CO2 mitigation and the determinants under climate change: a case study of Suzhou, China.公众对二氧化碳减排的支付意愿及气候变化背景下的影响因素:以中国苏州为例
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
6
Knowledge and perceptions of air pollution in Ningbo, China.中国宁波对空气污染的认知与看法。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 5;16(1):1138. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3788-0.
7
Assessing the health benefits of urban air pollution reductions associated with climate change mitigation (2000-2020): Santiago, São Paulo, México City, and New York City.评估与缓解气候变化相关的城市空气污染减少所带来的健康效益(2000 - 2020年):圣地亚哥、圣保罗、墨西哥城和纽约市。
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Jun;109 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):419-25. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s3419.
8
Benefits on public health from transport-related greenhouse gas mitigation policies in Southeastern European cities.东南欧城市交通相关温室气体减排政策对公共健康的益处。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;579:1427-1438. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.142. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
9
Air quality co-benefits of subnational carbon policies.地方碳政策的空气质量协同效益。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2016 Oct;66(10):988-1002. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1192071.
10
Co-benefits of global, domestic, and sectoral greenhouse gas mitigation for US air quality and human health in 2050.2050年全球、国内及部门温室气体减排对美国空气质量和人类健康的协同效益。
Environ Res Lett. 2017 Nov;12(11). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8f76. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of China's low-carbon city pilot policy on public health expenditure.中国低碳城市试点政策对公共卫生支出的影响。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 21;13:1454088. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1454088. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A Cross-Sectional Study of Heat Wave-Related Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice among the Public in the Licheng District of Jinan City, China.中国济南市历城区公众与热浪相关的知识、态度和行为的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jun 29;13(7):648. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13070648.
2
Perceptions of capacity for infectious disease control and prevention to meet the challenges of dengue fever in the face of climate change: A survey among CDC staff in Guangdong Province, China.应对气候变化下登革热挑战的传染病控制和预防能力认知:中国广东省疾病预防控制中心工作人员调查。
Environ Res. 2016 Jul;148:295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.03.043. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
3
Challenges and Opportunities for Urban Environmental Health and Sustainability: the HEALTHY-POLIS initiative.
城市环境卫生与可持续发展面临的挑战与机遇:“健康城市”倡议
Environ Health. 2016 Mar 8;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0096-1.
4
Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on planetary health.在人类世保护人类健康:洛克菲勒基金会-柳叶刀行星健康委员会报告
Lancet. 2015 Nov 14;386(10007):1973-2028. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
5
Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health.健康与气候变化:保护公众健康的政策应对措施。
Lancet. 2015 Nov 7;386(10006):1861-914. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60854-6. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
6
Traffic-related air pollution and health co-benefits of alternative transport in Adelaide, South Australia.澳大利亚南澳阿德莱德的交通相关空气污染与替代交通的健康协同效益。
Environ Int. 2015 Jan;74:281-90. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 9.
7
Climate Policy. China's peak carbon pledge raises pointed questions.气候政策。中国的碳达峰承诺引发了尖锐问题。
Science. 2014 Nov 21;346(6212):903. doi: 10.1126/science.346.6212.903.
8
Perception, attitude and behavior in relation to climate change: a survey among CDC health professionals in Shanxi province, China.与气候变化相关的认知、态度和行为:中国山西省疾病预防控制中心卫生专业人员的调查。
Environ Res. 2014 Oct;134:301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Sep 7.
9
Rapid warming in Tibet, China: public perception, response and coping resources in urban Lhasa.中国西藏的快速变暖:拉萨市区的公众认知、应对措施及应对资源
Environ Health. 2013 Aug 27;12(1):71. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-71.
10
Heat waves and climate change: applying the health belief model to identify predictors of risk perception and adaptive behaviours in adelaide, australia.热浪和气候变化:应用健康信念模型识别澳大利亚阿德莱德风险感知和适应行为的预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 May 29;10(6):2164-84. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10062164.