Cattaneo Davide, Lamers Ilse, Bertoni Rita, Feys Peter, Jonsdottir Johanna
LaRiCE Lab: Gait and Balance Disorders Laboratory; Don Gnocchi Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
REVAL-Rehabilitation Research Institute, BIOMED-Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jul;98(7):1308-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
OBJECTIVES: To calculate the percentage of participation restrictions according to disability level in multiple sclerosis (MS), and to assess the relationship between participation restrictions and cognitive, gait, balance, and upper limb deficits. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=125) consisted of people with MS (n=105) and healthy subjects (HS; n=20). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Community integration Questionnaire was used to assess participation in home, social, and productive activities. Percentages of people with MS having Community Integration Questionnaire scores lower than the 10th percentile of those of HS were calculated for each subscale to categorize the persons with participation restrictions. Cognitive deficits (Symbol Digit Modalities Test), walking disability (25-ft walking test/Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]), balance disorders (Bohannon Standing Balance Test), and manual dexterity (Nine Hole Peg Test) were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-seven percent of participants showed participation restrictions, which increased with higher EDSS scores from 40% (EDSS<4) to 82% (EDSS>5.5). Social participation was more restricted than home integration, with <20% of participants shopping for groceries alone. Cognitive deficits were more highly associated (r=.60) with participation restrictions than balance (r=.47), gait (r=-.45), and hand dexterity (r=.45) limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Participation restrictions are present in MS and increase with disability level. However, the results also show that MS does not restrict participation in all domains. Participation restrictions at home are less restricted compared with social participation. Cognitive disorders are more associated with participation restrictions than physical limitations.
目的:计算多发性硬化症(MS)患者根据残疾程度出现参与限制的百分比,并评估参与限制与认知、步态、平衡和上肢功能缺损之间的关系。 设计:横断面研究。 地点:康复科。 参与者:参与者(N = 125)包括MS患者(n = 105)和健康受试者(HS;n = 20)。 干预措施:不适用。 主要观察指标:使用社区融合问卷评估家庭、社交和生产活动中的参与情况。计算每个子量表中MS患者社区融合问卷得分低于HS患者第10百分位数的百分比,以对存在参与限制的患者进行分类。记录认知功能缺损(符号数字模式测验)、行走障碍(25英尺步行测试/扩展残疾状态量表[EDSS])、平衡障碍(博汉农站立平衡测试)和手灵活性(九孔插板测试)。 结果:77%的参与者表现出参与限制,随着EDSS评分升高,参与限制从40%(EDSS<4)增加到82%(EDSS>5.5)。社交参与比家庭融合受到的限制更大,只有不到20%的参与者独自去杂货店购物。与平衡(r = 0.47)、步态(r = -0.45)和手部灵活性(r = 0.45)受限相比,认知功能缺损与参与限制的相关性更高(r = 0.60)。 结论:MS患者存在参与限制,且随残疾程度增加。然而,结果也表明MS并非在所有领域都限制参与。与社交参与相比,家庭参与限制较少。与身体功能受限相比,认知障碍与参与限制的相关性更高。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2025-6-19
Antioxidants (Basel). 2024-7-29