Shanahan Joanne, Morris Meg E, Bhriain Orfhlaith Ni, Volpe Daniele, Lynch Tim, Clifford Amanda M
Department of Clinical Therapies, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Healthscope, Northpark Private Hospital & La Trobe University Center for Sport and Exercise Medicine Research, School Allied Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Sep;98(9):1744-1751. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
To examine the feasibility of a randomized controlled study design and to explore the benefits of a set dancing intervention compared with usual care.
Randomized controlled design, with participants randomized to Irish set dance classes or a usual care group.
Community based.
Individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease (PD) (N=90).
The dance group attended a 1.5-hour dancing class each week for 10 weeks and undertook a home dance program for 20 minutes, 3 times per week. The usual care group continued with their usual care and daily activities.
The primary outcome was feasibility, determined by recruitment rates, success of randomization and allocation procedures, attrition, adherence, safety, willingness of participants to be randomized, resource availability, and cost. Secondary outcomes were motor function (motor section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale), quality of life (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39), functional endurance (6-min walk test), and balance (mini-BESTest).
Ninety participants were randomized (45 per group). There were no adverse effects or resource constraints. Although adherence to the dancing program was 93.5%, there was >40% attrition in each group. Postintervention, the dance group had greater nonsignificant gains in quality of life than the usual care group. There was a meaningful deterioration in endurance in the usual care group. There were no meaningful changes in other outcomes. The exit questionnaire showed participants enjoyed the classes and would like to continue participation.
For people with mild to moderately severe PD, set dancing is feasible and enjoyable and may improve quality of life.
探讨随机对照研究设计的可行性,并探究与常规护理相比,集体舞干预的益处。
随机对照设计,参与者被随机分配至爱尔兰集体舞课程组或常规护理组。
社区。
特发性帕金森病(PD)患者(N = 90)。
舞蹈组每周参加一次1.5小时的舞蹈课程,共10周,并进行每周3次、每次20分钟的家庭舞蹈练习。常规护理组继续其常规护理和日常活动。
主要指标为可行性,通过招募率、随机化和分配程序的成功率、损耗率、依从性、安全性、参与者对随机分组的意愿、资源可用性和成本来确定。次要指标为运动功能(统一帕金森病评定量表运动部分)、生活质量(帕金森病问卷 - 39)、功能耐力(6分钟步行试验)和平衡能力(简化BESTest量表)。
90名参与者被随机分组(每组45人)。未出现不良反应或资源限制。尽管舞蹈项目的依从率为93.5%,但每组的损耗率均超过40%。干预后,舞蹈组的生活质量改善幅度大于常规护理组,但差异无统计学意义。常规护理组的耐力出现了有意义的下降。其他指标无显著变化。退出调查问卷显示参与者喜欢这些课程,并希望继续参与。
对于轻度至中度重度PD患者,集体舞是可行且令人愉悦的,可能会改善生活质量。