Suppr超能文献

此前未接受治疗的 CLL 患者中低剂量利妥昔单抗的随机 IIB 期 ARCTIC 试验结果。

Results of the randomized phase IIB ARCTIC trial of low-dose rituximab in previously untreated CLL.

机构信息

Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Department of Haematology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Leukemia. 2017 Nov;31(11):2416-2425. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.96. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

Abstract

ARCTIC was a multicenter, randomized-controlled, open, phase IIB non-inferiority trial in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Conventional frontline therapy in fit patients is fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR). The trial hypothesized that including mitoxantrone with low-dose rituximab (FCM-miniR) would be non-inferior to FCR. A total of 200 patients were recruited to assess the primary end point of complete remission (CR) rates according to IWCLL criteria. Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate, minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, safety and cost-effectiveness. The trial closed following a pre-planned interim analysis. At final analysis, CR rates were 76 FCR vs 55% FCM-miniR (adjusted odds ratio: 0.37; 95% confidence interval: 0.19-0.73). MRD-negativity rates were 54 FCR vs 44% FCM-miniR. More participants experienced serious adverse reactions with FCM-miniR (49%) compared to FCR (41%). There are no significant differences between the treatment groups for PFS and OS. FCM-miniR is not expected to be cost-effective over a lifetime horizon. In summary, FCM-miniR is less well tolerated than FCR with an inferior response and MRD-negativity rate and increased toxicity, and will not be taken forward into a confirmatory trial. The trial demonstrated that oral FCR yields high response rates compared to historical series with intravenous chemotherapy.

摘要

ARCTIC 是一项多中心、随机对照、开放、IIB 期非劣效性试验,针对未经治疗的慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者。适合患者的常规一线治疗是氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗(FCR)。该试验假设在低剂量利妥昔单抗(FCM-miniR)中加入米托蒽醌(mitoxantrone)将不劣于 FCR。共招募了 200 名患者,根据 IWCLL 标准评估主要终点完全缓解(CR)率。次要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、总缓解率、微小残留病(MRD)阴性率、安全性和成本效益。该试验在计划的中期分析后关闭。在最终分析中,CR 率为 FCR 组 76%,FCM-miniR 组 55%(调整后的优势比:0.37;95%置信区间:0.19-0.73)。MRD 阴性率为 FCR 组 54%,FCM-miniR 组 44%。与 FCR 组(41%)相比,FCM-miniR 组有更多的参与者出现严重不良反应(49%)。在 PFS 和 OS 方面,两组之间没有显著差异。在终身范围内,FCM-miniR 预计不会具有成本效益。综上所述,与 FCR 相比,FCM-miniR 的耐受性较差,缓解率和 MRD 阴性率较低,毒性增加,不会推进到确认性试验。该试验表明,口服 FCR 与静脉内化疗的历史系列相比,产生了较高的反应率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验