Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Department of Haematology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Leukemia. 2017 Nov;31(11):2416-2425. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.96. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
ARCTIC was a multicenter, randomized-controlled, open, phase IIB non-inferiority trial in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Conventional frontline therapy in fit patients is fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR). The trial hypothesized that including mitoxantrone with low-dose rituximab (FCM-miniR) would be non-inferior to FCR. A total of 200 patients were recruited to assess the primary end point of complete remission (CR) rates according to IWCLL criteria. Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate, minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, safety and cost-effectiveness. The trial closed following a pre-planned interim analysis. At final analysis, CR rates were 76 FCR vs 55% FCM-miniR (adjusted odds ratio: 0.37; 95% confidence interval: 0.19-0.73). MRD-negativity rates were 54 FCR vs 44% FCM-miniR. More participants experienced serious adverse reactions with FCM-miniR (49%) compared to FCR (41%). There are no significant differences between the treatment groups for PFS and OS. FCM-miniR is not expected to be cost-effective over a lifetime horizon. In summary, FCM-miniR is less well tolerated than FCR with an inferior response and MRD-negativity rate and increased toxicity, and will not be taken forward into a confirmatory trial. The trial demonstrated that oral FCR yields high response rates compared to historical series with intravenous chemotherapy.
ARCTIC 是一项多中心、随机对照、开放、IIB 期非劣效性试验,针对未经治疗的慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者。适合患者的常规一线治疗是氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗(FCR)。该试验假设在低剂量利妥昔单抗(FCM-miniR)中加入米托蒽醌(mitoxantrone)将不劣于 FCR。共招募了 200 名患者,根据 IWCLL 标准评估主要终点完全缓解(CR)率。次要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、总缓解率、微小残留病(MRD)阴性率、安全性和成本效益。该试验在计划的中期分析后关闭。在最终分析中,CR 率为 FCR 组 76%,FCM-miniR 组 55%(调整后的优势比:0.37;95%置信区间:0.19-0.73)。MRD 阴性率为 FCR 组 54%,FCM-miniR 组 44%。与 FCR 组(41%)相比,FCM-miniR 组有更多的参与者出现严重不良反应(49%)。在 PFS 和 OS 方面,两组之间没有显著差异。在终身范围内,FCM-miniR 预计不会具有成本效益。综上所述,与 FCR 相比,FCM-miniR 的耐受性较差,缓解率和 MRD 阴性率较低,毒性增加,不会推进到确认性试验。该试验表明,口服 FCR 与静脉内化疗的历史系列相比,产生了较高的反应率。