Suppr超能文献

使用C - 变革住院医师调查问卷评估住院医师培训文化:美国34个住院医师培训项目的效度证据

Assessing the Culture of Residency Using the C - Change Resident Survey: Validity Evidence in 34 U.S. Residency Programs.

作者信息

Pololi Linda H, Evans Arthur T, Civian Janet T, Shea Sandy, Brennan Robert T

机构信息

National Initiative on Gender, Culture and Leadership in Medicine: C - Change, Brandeis Women's Studies Research Center, Brandeis University, Mailstop 079, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA.

Hospital Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul;32(7):783-789. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4038-6. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A practical instrument is needed to reliably measure the clinical learning environment and professionalism for residents.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and present evidence of validity of an instrument to assess the culture of residency programs and the clinical learning environment.

DESIGN

During 2014-2015, we surveyed residents using the C - Change Resident Survey to assess residents' perceptions of the culture in their programs.

PARTICIPANTS

Residents in all years of training in 34 programs in internal medicine, pediatrics, and general surgery in 14 geographically diverse public and private academic health systems.

MAIN MEASURES

The C - Change Resident Survey assessed residents' perceptions of 13 dimensions of the culture: Vitality, Self-Efficacy, Institutional Support, Relationships/Inclusion, Values Alignment, Ethical/Moral Distress, Respect, Mentoring, Work-Life Integration, Gender Equity, Racial/Ethnic Minority Equity, and self-assessed Competencies. We measured the internal reliability of each of the 13 dimensions and evaluated response process, content validity, and construct-related evidence validity by assessing relationships predicted by our conceptual model and prior research. We also assessed whether the measurements were sensitive to differences in specialty and across institutions.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 1708 residents completed the survey [internal medicine: n = 956, pediatrics: n = 411, general surgery: n = 311 (51% women; 16% underrepresented in medicine minority)], with a response rate of 70% (range across programs, 51-87%). Internal consistency of each dimension was high (Cronbach α: 0.73-0.90). The instrument was able to detect significant differences in the learning environment across programs and sites. Evidence of validity was supported by a good response process and the demonstration of several relationships predicted by our conceptual model.

CONCLUSIONS

The C - Change Resident Survey assesses the clinical learning environment for residents, and we encourage further study of validity in different contexts. Results could be used to facilitate and monitor improvements in the clinical learning environment and resident well-being.

摘要

背景

需要一种实用工具来可靠地衡量住院医师的临床学习环境和职业素养。

目的

开发一种用于评估住院医师培训项目文化和临床学习环境的工具,并提供其有效性证据。

设计

在2014 - 2015年期间,我们使用C - Change住院医师调查问卷对住院医师进行了调查,以评估他们对所在项目文化的看法。

参与者

来自14个地理位置不同的公立和私立学术健康系统中34个内科、儿科和普通外科培训项目的各年住院医师。

主要测量指标

C - Change住院医师调查问卷评估了住院医师对文化的13个维度的看法:活力、自我效能感、机构支持、人际关系/包容度、价值观一致性、道德/伦理困扰、尊重、指导、工作与生活平衡、性别平等、种族/少数族裔平等以及自我评估的能力。我们测量了13个维度中每个维度的内部信度,并通过评估我们的概念模型和先前研究预测的关系来评估应答过程、内容效度和与结构相关的证据效度。我们还评估了测量结果对专业差异和不同机构差异的敏感性。

关键结果

共有1708名住院医师完成了调查[内科:n = 956,儿科:n = 411,普通外科:n = 311(51%为女性;16%为医学领域代表性不足的少数族裔)],应答率为70%(各项目范围为51 - 87%)。每个维度的内部一致性都很高(克朗巴哈α系数:0.73 - 0.90)。该工具能够检测出不同项目和地点之间学习环境的显著差异。良好的应答过程以及我们概念模型预测的几种关系的证明支持了效度证据。

结论

C - Change住院医师调查问卷可评估住院医师的临床学习环境,我们鼓励在不同背景下进一步研究其效度。研究结果可用于促进和监测临床学习环境及住院医师幸福感的改善。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Culture of Residency Using the C - Change Resident Survey: Validity Evidence in 34 U.S. Residency Programs.
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul;32(7):783-789. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4038-6. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
2
Resident Vitality in 34 Programs at 14 Academic Health Systems: Insights for Educating Physicians and Surgeons for the Future.
J Surg Educ. 2018 Nov;75(6):1441-1451. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.021. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
3
Assessing the Learning Environment for Medical Students: An Evaluation of a Novel Survey Instrument in Four Medical Schools.
Acad Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;41(3):354-359. doi: 10.1007/s40596-016-0620-1. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
5
Us, Too. Sexual Harassment Within Academic Medicine in the United States.
Am J Med. 2020 Feb;133(2):245-248. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.06.031. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Evaluation of urology residents' perception of surgical theater educational environment.
J Surg Educ. 2015 Jan-Feb;72(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
8
The effects of sleep loss and fatigue on resident-physicians: a multi-institutional, mixed-method study.
Acad Med. 2004 May;79(5):394-406. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200405000-00007.

引用本文的文献

1
Departure Decisions: Exit Survey of Family Medicine Residency Directors.
PRiMER. 2024 Aug 21;8:46. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2024.770282. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluating the Impact of Coaching Through the Transition to Residency.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jan;40(1):10-16. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08865-w. Epub 2024 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Learning Environment for Medical Students: An Evaluation of a Novel Survey Instrument in Four Medical Schools.
Acad Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;41(3):354-359. doi: 10.1007/s40596-016-0620-1. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
2
Surgical Resident Duty Hours.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2399-401. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1604659.
3
Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence.
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2948-2958. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01091-0. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
4
A PIECE OF MY MIND. From Shame to Guilt to Love.
JAMA. 2015 Dec 15;314(23):2507-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.11521.
5
Institution and Specialty Contribute to Resident Satisfaction With Their Learning Environment and Workload.
Acad Med. 2015 Nov;90(11 Suppl):S77-82. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000898.
6
Mentoring Faculty: A US National Survey of Its Adequacy and Linkage to Culture in Academic Health Centers.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015 Summer;35(3):176-84. doi: 10.1002/chp.21294.
7
9
Harassment and discrimination in medical training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Acad Med. 2014 May;89(5):817-27. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000200.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验