• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解释水平在前瞻性思维中作用的神经学证据。

Neurological evidence for the role of construal level in future-directed thought.

作者信息

Stillman Paul E, Lee Hyojin, Deng Xiaoyan, Unnava H Rao, Cunningham William A, Fujita Kentaro

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Department of Marketing, Lucas College and Graduate School of Business, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA.

出版信息

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):937-947. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx022.

DOI:10.1093/scan/nsx022
PMID:28338716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5472149/
Abstract

The ability to mentally represent future events is a significant human psychological achievement. A challenge that people encounter is that they often lack detailed specifics about distant relative to near future events. Construal level theory proposes that people represent distant future events by their abstract and essential features-a process referred to as high-level construal. As events become temporally proximal, people represent events by their increasingly available and reliable concrete and idiosyncratic features-a process referred to as low-level construal. The present fMRI experiment provides direct neural evidence for these assertions. Using the why-how localizer as a measure of construal level, results revealed brain regions associated with both temporal distance and high-level construal (medial prefrontal cortex), as well as temporal proximity and low-level construal (precuneus). We discuss the implications of these findings for the neuroscience of mental time travel and cognitive representation.

摘要

在心理上表征未来事件的能力是人类一项重要的心理成就。人们面临的一个挑战是,相对于近期事件,他们往往缺乏关于遥远未来事件的详细具体信息。解释水平理论提出,人们通过抽象和本质特征来表征遥远的未来事件——这一过程被称为高水平解释。随着事件在时间上越来越接近,人们通过越来越容易获得且可靠的具体和独特特征来表征事件——这一过程被称为低水平解释。目前的功能磁共振成像实验为这些论断提供了直接的神经证据。使用“为什么-如何”定位任务作为解释水平的一种测量方法,结果揭示了与时间距离和高水平解释相关的脑区(内侧前额叶皮质),以及与时间接近性和低水平解释相关的脑区(楔前叶)。我们讨论了这些发现对心理时间旅行和认知表征神经科学的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/d5cb53d0e373/nsx022f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/6c720426a37e/nsx022f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/6b8991222411/nsx022f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/fe951d7ebb50/nsx022f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/2b44a50884e8/nsx022f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/7f27f732568c/nsx022f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/d5cb53d0e373/nsx022f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/6c720426a37e/nsx022f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/6b8991222411/nsx022f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/fe951d7ebb50/nsx022f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/2b44a50884e8/nsx022f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/7f27f732568c/nsx022f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a1/5472149/d5cb53d0e373/nsx022f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Neurological evidence for the role of construal level in future-directed thought.解释水平在前瞻性思维中作用的神经学证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):937-947. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx022.
2
Construal level shifts integration and segregation of the brain network.构建层次转变整合和大脑网络的分离。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Feb;149(2):382-390. doi: 10.1037/xge0000637. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
3
Modulation of medial prefrontal and inferior parietal cortices when thinking about past, present, and future selves.当思考过去、现在和未来的自我时,内侧前额叶和下顶叶皮层的调节。
Soc Neurosci. 2010;5(2):187-200. doi: 10.1080/17470910903233562. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
4
Temporal Construal Effects Are Independent of Episodic Future Thought.时间构想效应独立于情景式未来思维。
Psychol Sci. 2023 Jan;34(1):75-86. doi: 10.1177/09567976221120001. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
5
Temporal construal.时间构想
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jul;110(3):403-21. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403.
6
Thinking about the future versus the past in personal and non-personal contexts.在个人和非个人情境中思考未来与过去。
Brain Res. 2008 Oct 3;1233:106-19. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.084. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
7
Temporal distance and person memory: thinking about the future changes memory for the past.时间距离与人物记忆:展望未来会改变对过去的记忆。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Jun;36(6):805-16. doi: 10.1177/0146167210370965. Epub 2010 May 5.
8
Involvement of the mentalizing network in social and non-social high construal.心理化网络在社会和非社会高语境中的作用。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Jun;9(6):817-24. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst048. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
9
Putting the pieces together: Generating a novel representational space through deductive reasoning.将碎片组合在一起:通过演绎推理生成新的表示空间。
Neuroimage. 2018 Dec;183:99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.062. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
10
Retrospective future thinking: Keeping distant personal future events mentally close.回顾性未来思考:保持遥远的个人未来事件在心理上的贴近。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Aug;76(8):1817-1829. doi: 10.1177/17470218221126471. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the neural network involved in mentally projecting the self through episodic autobiographical memories.揭示通过情景式自传体记忆在心理上投射自我所涉及的神经网络。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 14;15(1):12781. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97515-0.
2
Does sadness bring myopia: an intertemporal choice experiment with college students.悲伤会导致近视吗:一项针对大学生的跨期选择实验
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 26;15:1345951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345951. eCollection 2024.
3
The date/delay effect in intertemporal choice: A combined fMRI and eye-tracking study.

本文引用的文献

1
The neural basis of conceptualizing the same action at different levels of abstraction.在不同抽象层次上对同一动作进行概念化的神经基础。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Jul;11(7):1141-51. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv084. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
2
In search of a human self-regulation system.寻找人类自我调节系统。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015 Jul 8;38:389-411. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014243. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
3
The brain's default mode network.大脑的默认模式网络。
时间间隔选择中的日期/延迟效应:一项 fMRI 和眼动追踪研究的结合。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Feb 15;45(3):e26585. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26585.
4
A neural signature of the vividness of prospective thought is modulated by temporal proximity during intertemporal decision making.在跨期决策过程中,临近效应对前瞻性思维生动程度的神经特征具有调节作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov;119(44):e2214072119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214072119. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
5
Obesity, Appetite, and the Prefrontal Cortex.肥胖、食欲与前额叶皮层。
Curr Obes Rep. 2017 Dec;6(4):380-388. doi: 10.1007/s13679-017-0289-0.
6
Statistical Modeling of the Default Mode Brain Network Reveals a Segregated Highway Structure.默认模式脑网络的统计建模揭示了一种分离的高速公路结构。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 15;7(1):11694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09896-6.
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015 Jul 8;38:433-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030. Epub 2015 May 4.
4
The cognitive neuroscience of working memory.工作记忆的认知神经科学
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:115-42. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
5
Validating the Why/How contrast for functional MRI studies of Theory of Mind.验证用于心理理论功能磁共振成像研究的“为什么/如何”对比。
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 1;99:301-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.023. Epub 2014 May 17.
6
Traversing psychological distance.穿越心理距离。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;18(7):364-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
7
The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance.默认网络和自我产生的思维:组成过程、动态控制和临床相关性。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 May;1316(1):29-52. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12360. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
8
A common cortical metric for spatial, temporal, and social distance.一种常见的用于空间、时间和社会距离的皮质度量。
J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 29;34(5):1979-87. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2159-13.2014.
9
Precuneus is a functional core of the default-mode network.楔前叶是默认模式网络的功能核心。
J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 15;34(3):932-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4227-13.2014.
10
The future is now: comparing the effect of episodic future thinking on impulsivity in lean and obese individuals.未来已来:比较情景式未来思维对瘦人和肥胖个体冲动性的影响。
Appetite. 2013 Dec;71:120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Jul 31.