Suppr超能文献

经骨缝合法关节镜下肩袖修复术的优势:一项前瞻性随机对照试验

Advantages of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With a Transosseous Suture Technique: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Randelli Pietro, Stoppani Carlo Alberto, Zaolino Carlo, Menon Alessandra, Randelli Filippo, Cabitza Paolo

机构信息

IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.

Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):2000-2009. doi: 10.1177/0363546517695789. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tear is a common finding in patients with painful, poorly functioning shoulders. The surgical management of this disorder has improved greatly and can now be fully arthroscopic.

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical and radiological results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 different techniques: single-row anchor fixation versus transosseous hardware-free suture repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with rotator cuff tears were enrolled: 35 patients were operated with metal anchors and 34 with standardized transosseous repair. The patients were clinically evaluated before surgery, during the 28 days after surgery, and at least 1 year after the operation by the use of validated rating scores (Constant score, QuickDASH, and numerical rating scale [NRS]). Final follow-up was obtained at more than 3 years by a QuickDASH evaluation to detect any difference from the previous follow-up. During the follow-up, rotator cuff integrity was determined through magnetic resonance imaging and was classified according to the 5 Sugaya categories.

RESULTS

Patients operated with the transosseous technique had significantly less pain, especially from the 15th postoperative day: In the third week, the mean NRS value for the anchor group was 3.00 while that for transosseous group was 2.46 ( P = .02); in the fourth week, the values were 2.44 and 1.76, respectively ( P < .01). No differences in functional outcome were noted between the 2 groups at the final evaluation. In the evaluation of rotator cuff repair integrity, based on Sugaya magnetic resonance imaging classification, no significant difference was found between the 2 techniques in terms of retear rate ( P = .81).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found between the 2 arthroscopic repair techniques in terms of functional and radiological results. However, postoperative pain decreased more quickly after the transosseous procedure, which therefore emerges as a possible improvement in the surgical repair of the rotator cuff. Registration: NCT01815177 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

摘要

背景

肩袖撕裂在肩部疼痛、功能不佳的患者中很常见。这种疾病的手术治疗有了很大改进,现在可以完全通过关节镜进行。

目的

评估使用两种不同技术进行关节镜下肩袖修复的临床和放射学结果:单排锚钉固定与无金属硬件的经骨缝合修复。

研究设计

随机对照试验;证据等级,1级。

方法

纳入69例肩袖撕裂患者:35例患者采用金属锚钉手术,34例采用标准化经骨修复手术。通过使用经过验证的评分量表(Constant评分、QuickDASH和数字评分量表[NRS])在手术前、术后28天内以及术后至少1年对患者进行临床评估。通过QuickDASH评估在3年多后进行最终随访,以检测与之前随访的任何差异。在随访期间,通过磁共振成像确定肩袖完整性,并根据5种Sugaya分类进行分类。

结果

采用经骨技术手术的患者疼痛明显减轻,尤其是在术后第15天之后:在第三周,锚钉组的平均NRS值为3.00,而经骨组为2.46(P = 0.02);在第四周,值分别为2.44和1.76(P < 0.01)。在最终评估中,两组之间在功能结果方面没有差异。在基于Sugaya磁共振成像分类的肩袖修复完整性评估中,两种技术在再撕裂率方面没有显著差异(P = 0.81)。

结论

两种关节镜修复技术在功能和放射学结果方面没有显著差异。然而,经骨手术后术后疼痛减轻得更快,因此经骨手术成为肩袖手术修复中一种可能的改进方法。注册:NCT01815177(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验