• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国他杀-自杀案件中留遗书者与未留遗书者的比较

A Comparison of Note Writers and No Note Writers in Homicide-Suicide Cases in Germany.

作者信息

Weeke Anna, Oberwittler Dietrich

出版信息

Arch Suicide Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;22(1):11-19. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2017.1304307. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1080/13811118.2017.1304307
PMID:28339322
Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate potential differences between homicide-suicide cases in which the perpetrator does or does not write a suicide note. As homicide-suicides are complex types of lethal violence for which the aggressor cannot be held accountable, suicide notes may be a valuable source of information about the background of these cases and the perpetrators' motives. We use a national sample of N = 288 homicide-suicide cases in Germany applying group comparisons and chi-square tests for relevant variables. Perpetrators killing their own children and perpetrators leaving children behind before killing themselves write significantly more suicide notes than other perpetrators. Even though note writers and no note writers are similar regarding most sociodemographic characteristics, other differences question the generalizability between these 2 groups.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查行凶后自杀案件中,行凶者留下或未留下遗书的潜在差异。由于行凶后自杀是一种复杂的致命暴力形式,行凶者无需承担责任,遗书可能是有关这些案件背景和行凶者动机的宝贵信息来源。我们使用德国全国范围内N = 288起行凶后自杀案件的样本,对相关变量进行组间比较和卡方检验。杀害自己孩子的行凶者以及在自杀前留下孩子的行凶者比其他行凶者写下遗书的比例显著更高。尽管写遗书者和不写遗书者在大多数社会人口统计学特征方面相似,但其他差异对这两组之间的普遍性提出了质疑。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Note Writers and No Note Writers in Homicide-Suicide Cases in Germany.德国他杀-自杀案件中留遗书者与未留遗书者的比较
Arch Suicide Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;22(1):11-19. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2017.1304307. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
2
Familicide: a comparison with spousal and child homicide by mentally disordered perpetrators.杀亲案:精神障碍犯罪者实施的杀亲案与配偶及儿童凶杀案之比较
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2008;18(5):306-18. doi: 10.1002/cbm.710.
3
Risk factors for filicide and homicide: 36-year national matched cohort study.杀亲风险因素:36 年全国匹配队列研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;75(2):127-32. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08372.
4
Suicide following homicide in the family.家庭中发生杀人事件后的自杀行为。
Violence Vict. 1996 Summer;11(2):99-112.
5
A systematic review of literature on homicide followed by suicide and mental state of perpetrators.对杀人后继而自杀者的精神状态相关文献的系统回顾。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2024 Feb;34(1):10-53. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2322. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
6
Domestic homicide followed by parasuicide: a comparison with homicide and parasuicide.继准自杀后的家庭内部杀人案:与杀人案和准自杀的比较
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2009 Oct;53(5):497-516. doi: 10.1177/0306624X09334646. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
7
A statewide case-control study of spousal homicide-suicide in older persons.一项关于老年人配偶他杀-自杀的全州范围病例对照研究。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;13(3):211-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.3.211.
8
Filicide-suicide involving children with disabilities.涉及残疾儿童的杀子自杀行为。
J Child Neurol. 2013 Jun;28(6):745-51. doi: 10.1177/0883073812451777. Epub 2012 Jul 22.
9
Homicide-followed-by-suicide incidents involving child victims.涉及儿童受害者的先杀人后自杀事件。
Am J Health Behav. 2013 Jul;37(4):531-42. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.37.4.11.
10
[Female intimate partner homicide: clinical and criminological issues].[女性亲密伴侣杀人案:临床与犯罪学问题]
Encephale. 2013 Dec;39(6):416-25. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.010. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Leaking in Intimate Partner Homicide: A Systematic Review.亲密伴侣杀人案中的漏报:系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Oct;25(4):3005-3019. doi: 10.1177/15248380241237213. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
2
Intimate Partner Homicide Suicide: a Mini-Review of the Literature (2012-2018).亲密伴侣杀人自杀:文献综述(2012-2018 年)。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Feb 21;21(3):13. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-0995-2.