Kim Young Uk, Park Jun Young, Kim Doo Hwan, Karm Myung-Hwan, Lee Jae-Young, Yoo Jee In, Chon Sung Won, Suh Jeong Hun
University Seoul, Republic of Korea.
College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):E419-E424.
Hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum (LF) has been considered as a major cause of lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS). Previous studies have found that ligamentum flavum thickness (LFT) is correlated with aging, disc degeneration, and lumbar spinal stenosis. However, hypertrophy is different from thickness. Thus, to evaluate hypertrophy of the whole LF, we devised a new morphological parameter, called the ligamentum flavum area (LFA).
We hypothesized that the LFA is a key morphologic parameter in the diagnosis of LCSS.
Retrospective observational study.
The single center study in Seoul, Republic of Korea.
LF samples were collected from 166 patients with LCSS, and from 167 controls who underwent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as part of a routine medical examination. T1-weighted axial MR imageswere acquired at the facet joint level from individual patients. We measured the LFA and LFT at the L4-L5 intervertebral level on MRI using a picture archiving and communications system. The LFA was measured as the cross-sectional area of the whole LF at the L4-L5 stenotic level. The LFT was measured by drawing a line along the side of the ligament facing the spinal canal and along the laminar side of the ligament curve and then measuring the thickest point at the L4-L5 level.
The average LFA was 96.56 ± 30.74 mm2 in the control group and 132.69 ± 32.68 mm2 in the LCSS group. The average LFT was 3.61 ± 0.72 mm in the control group and 4.24 ± 0.97 mm in the LCSS group. LCSS patients had significantly higher LFA (P < 0.001) and LFT (P < 0.001). Regarding the validity of both LFA and LFT as predictors of LCSS, Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis showed that the best cut-off point for the LFA was 105.90 mm2, with 80.1% sensitivity, 76.0% specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78 - 0.87). The best cut off-point of the LFT was 3.74 mm, with 70.5% sensitivity, 66.5% specificity, and AUC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66 - 0.77).
The principal methodological limitation was the retrospective observational nature. Anatomically, degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis can involve the central canal, foramina, and lateral recess. However, we focused on LCSS only.
Although the LFT and LFA were both significantly associated with LCSS, the LFA was a more sensitive measurement parameter. Thus, to evaluate LCSS patients, the treating doctor should more carefully analyze the LFA than LFT.Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval number: S2015-1328-0001Key words: Ligamentum flavum, ligamentum flavum area, ligamentum flavum thickness, lumbar central spinal stenosis, hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum, morphological parameter, cross-sectional area, optimal cut-off point.
黄韧带肥厚被认为是腰椎中央管狭窄症(LCSS)的主要原因。以往研究发现,黄韧带厚度(LFT)与衰老、椎间盘退变及腰椎管狭窄相关。然而,肥厚与厚度有所不同。因此,为评估整个黄韧带的肥厚情况,我们设计了一个新的形态学参数,即黄韧带面积(LFA)。
我们假设LFA是诊断LCSS的关键形态学参数。
回顾性观察研究。
韩国首尔的单中心研究。
从166例LCSS患者及167例作为常规体检一部分接受腰椎磁共振成像(MRI)检查的对照者中采集黄韧带样本。从个体患者的小关节水平获取T1加权轴向MR图像。我们使用图像存档与通信系统在MRI上测量L4-L5椎间水平的LFA和LFT。LFA测量为L4-L5狭窄水平处整个黄韧带的横截面积。LFT测量方法是沿着韧带面对椎管的一侧及韧带曲线的椎板侧画一条线,然后测量L4-L5水平处最厚点。
对照组平均LFA为96.56±30.74mm²,LCSS组为132.69±32.68mm²。对照组平均LFT为3.61±0.72mm,LCSS组为4.24±0.97mm。LCSS患者的LFA(P<0.001)和LFT(P<0.001)显著更高。关于LFA和LFT作为LCSS预测指标的有效性,受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,LFA的最佳截断点为105.90mm²,敏感性为80.1%,特异性为76.0%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.83(95%CI,0.78-0.87)。LFT的最佳截断点为3.74mm,敏感性为70.5%,特异性为66.5%,AUC为0.72(95%CI,0.66-0.77)。
主要方法学局限性在于回顾性观察性质。从解剖学角度看,退变性腰椎管狭窄可累及中央管、椎间孔和侧隐窝。然而,我们仅关注LCSS。
尽管LFT和LFA均与LCSS显著相关,但LFA是更敏感的测量参数。因此,对于评估LCSS患者,治疗医生应比LFT更仔细地分析LFA。
机构审查委员会(IRB)批准号:S2015-1328-0001
黄韧带、黄韧带面积、黄韧带厚度、腰椎中央管狭窄症、黄韧带肥厚、形态学参数、横截面积、最佳截断点