Aliyev Ali, Ekin Ömer, Bitik Ozan, Korkusuz Petek, Yersal Nilgün Cabus, Çelik Hakan Hamdi, Tunçbilek Gökhan
Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ordu Devlet Hastanesi, Ordu, Turkey.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Jun;34(5):307-314. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598254. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
Reconstruction of craniofacial bone defects is a primary focus of craniofacial surgery. Although autogenous bone grafts remain as the gold standard, alloplastic materials have also gained widespread popularity due to their off-the-shelf availability, ease of use, and durability. In addition to replacing the missing bone, some of these alloplastic materials have also been found to induce new bone formation.
In this study, the phenomenon of neo-osseous induction with bioactive glass was investigated for different implant-soft tissue configurations.
Thirty-two male, Wistar albino rats were divided into four equally numbered study groups. In group 1 (FP), adipofascial groin flaps were prefabricated with free periosteal grafts. In group 2 (FPB), adipofascial groin flaps were prefabricated with free periosteal grafts and bioactive glass. In group 3 (FB), adipofascial groin flaps were prefabricated with bioactive glass. In group 4 (control), adipofascial groin flaps were not prefabricated. Morphometric analyses of the prefabricated structures were performed using micro-CT. The histologic properties of the ectopic ossification were assessed by using a modified scoring system.
Group 1 (FP) showed the greatest rate of mature lamellar bone formation. Group 2 (FBP) showed the greatest amount of bone density and volume. However, the addition of bioactive glass in group 2 (FBP) decreased the rate of mature lamellar bone formation when compared with group 1 (FP). Ectopic ossification was not observed in the control group.
Bioactive glass can be successfully used in the prefabrication of vascularized compound structures for the reconstruction of complex bone defects. However, interference with the periosteal induction of mature lamellar bone formation should be taken into consideration, especially in pediatric bone defects, which primarily rely on spontaneous osteogenesis through periosteal induction.
颅面骨缺损的重建是颅面外科的主要关注点。尽管自体骨移植仍是金标准,但异体材料因其现货供应、使用方便和耐用性也已广泛流行。除了替代缺失的骨组织外,还发现其中一些异体材料可诱导新骨形成。
在本研究中,针对不同的植入物 - 软组织配置,研究了生物活性玻璃的新骨诱导现象。
32只雄性Wistar白化大鼠被平均分为四个研究组。第1组(FP),用游离骨膜移植物预制脂肪筋膜腹股沟皮瓣。第2组(FPB),用游离骨膜移植物和生物活性玻璃预制脂肪筋膜腹股沟皮瓣。第3组(FB),用生物活性玻璃预制脂肪筋膜腹股沟皮瓣。第4组(对照组),不进行预制脂肪筋膜腹股沟皮瓣。使用微型CT对预制结构进行形态计量分析。通过改良评分系统评估异位骨化的组织学特性。
第1组(FP)显示出成熟板层骨形成的最大速率。第2组(FBP)显示出最大的骨密度和骨体积。然而,与第1组(FP)相比,第2组(FBP)中生物活性玻璃的添加降低了成熟板层骨形成的速率。对照组未观察到异位骨化。
生物活性玻璃可成功用于预制带血管复合结构以重建复杂骨缺损。然而,应考虑其对成熟板层骨形成的骨膜诱导的干扰,特别是在主要依赖骨膜诱导自发骨生成的小儿骨缺损中。