• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同腹腔镜供肾切除术联合经阴道取出技术的比较——单中心经验

Comparison of Two Different Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy With Vaginal Extraction Techniques-A Single-Center Experience.

作者信息

Karayagiz A H, Erturk T, Cakir U, Berber I

机构信息

Transplant Center, Acibadem International Hospital, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Transplant Center, Acibadem International Hospital, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2017 Apr;49(3):411-414. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.035.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.035
PMID:28340802
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the results of standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with vaginal extraction (SLDN-VE) and laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy with vaginal extraction (LESSDN-VE).

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 95 female donors who underwent SLDN-VE (group I; n = 87) and LESSDN-VE (group II; n = 8) in our center. Parameters regarding donor age, body mass index (BMI), length of hospitalization, duration of surgical procedure, amount of blood loss, warm and cold ischemia times, side of graft nephrectomy, number of renal arteries and veins, postoperative visual analog pain scores at 6th and 12th hours (VAS6, VAS12), peri-and postoperative complications of donors and recipients, and graft function at discharge and follow-up were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

No significant difference regarding donor age, mean operative time, amount of blood loss, or warm ischemia time was observed between the 2 groups. However, BMI (P = .018) and pain scores (VAS6: P = .047; VAS12: P = .009) were lower and length of hospitalization (P = .005) shorter in group II. On the other hand, cold ischemia time (P = .047) was lower in group I. No peri- or postoperative complications occurred for donors and recipients in both groups. Graft function at discharge and during follow-up were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Because our first priority is to minimize the morbidity of donors, LESSDN-VE can be chosen in selected female donors for not only decreased pain and hospital stay, but also for better cosmetic outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较标准腹腔镜供体肾切除术联合经阴道取出术(SLDN-VE)与单孔腹腔镜供体肾切除术联合经阴道取出术(LESSDN-VE)的结果。

方法

我们分析了在本中心接受SLDN-VE(I组;n = 87)和LESSDN-VE(II组;n = 8)的95名女性供体的数据。比较了两组之间关于供体年龄、体重指数(BMI)、住院时间、手术时间、失血量、热缺血和冷缺血时间、移植肾切除侧、肾动静脉数量、术后第6小时和第12小时的视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS6、VAS12)、供体和受体的围手术期及术后并发症,以及出院时和随访时的移植肾功能等参数。

结果

两组之间在供体年龄、平均手术时间、失血量或热缺血时间方面未观察到显著差异。然而,II组的BMI(P = 0.018)和疼痛评分(VAS6:P = 0.047;VAS12:P = 0.009)较低且住院时间(P = 0.005)较短。另一方面,I组的冷缺血时间(P = 0.047)较低。两组的供体和受体均未发生围手术期或术后并发症。两组出院时和随访期间的移植肾功能相似。

结论

由于我们的首要任务是将供体的发病率降至最低,因此对于选定的女性供体,可以选择LESSDN-VE,这不仅可以减轻疼痛和缩短住院时间,还能获得更好的美容效果。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Two Different Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy With Vaginal Extraction Techniques-A Single-Center Experience.两种不同腹腔镜供肾切除术联合经阴道取出技术的比较——单中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2017 Apr;49(3):411-414. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.035.
2
Successful introduction of laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy after experience with laparoscopic single-site plus-one trocar donor nephrectomy.在经历了腹腔镜单孔加一针Trocar供肾切除术之后,成功引入了腹腔镜单孔供肾切除术。
J Endourol. 2015 Apr;29(4):435-42. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0509. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
3
A comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional procedures for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a Japanese multi-institutional retrospective study.腹腔镜单部位手术与传统腹腔镜供肾切除术的比较:日本多机构回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3424-3434. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07119-9. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
4
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy vs Standard Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.机器人辅助腹腔镜供体肾切除术与标准腹腔镜供体肾切除术:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Endourol. 2015 Dec;29(12):1334-40. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0213.
5
Comparison of outcomes in noncomplicated and in higher-risk donors after standard versus hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.标准腹腔镜肾切除术与手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术治疗非复杂性供体和高风险供体的疗效比较。
Am Surg. 2003 Sep;69(9):771-8.
6
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: donor and recipient outcomes.腹腔镜单部位供肾切取术与传统腹腔镜供肾切取术的比较:供者和受者结局。
Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1332-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.077. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
7
The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis.腹腔镜供体肾切除术用于肾移植的安全性和有效性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jan-Feb;45(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.152.
8
Retroperitoneal Single Port Versus Transperitoneal Multiport Donor Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial.后腹腔镜单切口与经腹腔多切口供肾切取术:前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Endourol. 2018 Jun;32(6):496-501. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0829. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
9
Pfannenstiel laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) vs conventional multiport laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.经脐单部位腹腔镜与传统多孔腹腔镜活体供肾切取术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
BJU Int. 2013 Sep;112(5):616-22. doi: 10.1111/bju.12202. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
10
Introducing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy after Experience in Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Approach.在有手辅助后腹腔镜入路经验后引入机器人辅助腹腔镜供体肾切除术。
Transplant Proc. 2019 Sep;51(7):2221-2224. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.041. Epub 2019 Aug 9.