Ueda Yoshiyuki, Chen Lei, Kopecky Jonathon, Cramer Emily S, Rensink Ronald A, Meyer David E, Kitayama Shinobu, Saiki Jun
Kokoro Research Center, Kyoto University.
Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University.
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;42(1):286-310. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12490. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
While some studies suggest cultural differences in visual processing, others do not, possibly because the complexity of their tasks draws upon high-level factors that could obscure such effects. To control for this, we examined cultural differences in visual search for geometric figures, a relatively simple task for which the underlying mechanisms are reasonably well known. We replicated earlier results showing that North Americans had a reliable search asymmetry for line length: Search for long among short lines was faster than vice versa. In contrast, Japanese participants showed no asymmetry. This difference did not appear to be affected by stimulus density. Other kinds of stimuli resulted in other patterns of asymmetry differences, suggesting that these are not due to factors such as analytic/holistic processing but are based instead on the target-detection process. In particular, our results indicate that at least some cultural differences reflect different ways of processing early-level features, possibly in response to environmental factors.
虽然一些研究表明视觉处理存在文化差异,但其他研究则不然,这可能是因为他们任务的复杂性涉及到可能掩盖此类影响的高级因素。为了控制这一点,我们研究了在视觉搜索几何图形方面的文化差异,这是一项相对简单的任务,其潜在机制已为人熟知。我们重复了早期的研究结果,即北美人在搜索线长时存在可靠的不对称性:在短线中搜索长线比反之要快。相比之下,日本参与者没有表现出不对称性。这种差异似乎不受刺激密度的影响。其他类型的刺激导致了不对称差异的其他模式,这表明这些差异不是由于诸如分析/整体处理等因素,而是基于目标检测过程。特别是,我们的结果表明,至少一些文化差异反映了处理早期特征的不同方式,这可能是对环境因素的反应。