Mira J G, Chen T T, Livingston R B, Wilson H E
University of Texas at San Antonio, Cancer Therapy and Research Foundation.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988 May;14(5):861-5. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(88)90006-5.
The issue whether cranial radiotherapy (RT) should be used prophylactically (PCI) or therapeutically (TCI) in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is considered controversial by some oncologists. Trying to clarify this issue we have performed a retrospective analysis of a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) protocol for disseminated SCLC. Three Hundred and seventy-seven cases had no evidence of metastases to the brain (MB). One hundred and forty four of those had PCI. Seventy one cases were diagnosed of MB, and 64 received TCI. We confirmed previous reports showing a low percentage of brain relapse with PCI (around 5%), with minimal immediate morbidity. We also confirmed a high percentage of objective response (90%) with TCI, (although we had no response information in 40% of them) with long duration of response of 33 weeks. Brain relapse after TCI was only 18%. Only long-term survivors had brain relapse as survival of relapsing patients was longer than those without brain relapse (45 weeks versus 33 weeks, p = 0.06). However, 20 (31%) of the 65 with initial MB died within 6 weeks of registration, some without completing RT to brain. In the majority, cause of death was considered related directly to brain damage, or indirectly as sepsis developed in patients whose poor performance status was considered to be caused by their brain symptoms. When comparing patients with and without MB, the former had (a) worse survival (24 versus 32 weeks, p = 0.02) and (b) higher proportion of patients with poor initial performance status (50% versus 34%, p = 0.04). Although the possibility of long-term morbidity with PCI is deterring some oncologists from recommending it, our data show that MB creates a real chance for immediate morbidity and this should not be ignored. The pros and cons of both approaches and some new recommendations for PCI are discussed.
对于小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者,颅部放疗(RT)究竟应作为预防性(PCI)还是治疗性(TCI)手段使用,一些肿瘤学家认为这一问题存在争议。为了阐明这一问题,我们对西南肿瘤协作组(SWOG)一项针对播散性SCLC的方案进行了回顾性分析。377例患者无脑转移(MB)证据,其中144例接受了PCI。71例被诊断为MB,64例接受了TCI。我们证实了之前的报告,即PCI后脑转移复发率较低(约5%),且近期发病率极低。我们还证实了TCI有较高的客观缓解率(90%),(尽管其中40%的患者没有缓解信息),缓解期长达33周。TCI后脑转移复发率仅为18%。只有长期存活者出现脑转移复发,因为复发患者的生存期长于未发生脑转移者(45周对33周,p = 0.06)。然而,65例初始诊断为MB的患者中有20例(31%)在登记后6周内死亡,部分患者未完成脑部放疗。大多数情况下,死亡原因被认为直接与脑损伤有关,或间接与脓毒症有关,这些患者的身体状况较差被认为是由脑部症状所致。在比较有和无脑转移的患者时,前者(a)生存期更短(24周对32周,p = 0.02),(b)初始身体状况较差的患者比例更高(50%对34%,p = 0.04)。尽管PCI可能导致长期发病,这使得一些肿瘤学家不愿推荐使用,但我们的数据表明,脑转移会带来近期发病的实际风险,不应被忽视。本文讨论了两种方法的利弊以及对PCI的一些新建议。