Mira J G, Livingston R B, Moore T N, Chen T, Batley F, Bogardus C R, Considine B, Mansfield C M, Schlosser J, Seydel H G
Cancer. 1982 Oct 1;50(7):1266-72. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19821001)50:7<1266::aid-cncr2820500708>3.0.co;2-0.
The value of radiotherapy to the chest (RC) in disseminated small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) has been questioned. Two protocols for disseminated SCLC from the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) have been compared. They were developed four years apart. The first one included radiotherapy (RT), 3000 rad in two weeks, to the primary tumor, mediastinum and supraclavicular areas, while the second one deleted any RC. Multidrug chemotherapy (CT) and brain RT were used in both protocols. Nonresponders to CT were removed from the study. Our main findings are as follows: (1) Initial chest relapses (patients with no initial extrathoracic relapse) have increased from 24-55% when RC is not given (P = 0.0001). Overall chest relapse (adding those patients that relapsed simultaneously in the chest plus other sites) in the second protocol was 73%. (2) Amount of response to CT does not influence the chances for relapse. Even complete responders to CT have a high chance for chest relapse. (3) Sites of relapse without RC are mainly in the primary tumor, ipsilateral hilus and mediastinum. (4) With RC, relapses shift to the chest periphery, mostly to the lung outside the radiotherapy field and to the pleura. (5) The two very different CT regimens have produced similar percentages and duration of response. (6) CT schema with periodic reinductions prolongs duration of response and survival over schema with continuous maintenance. Hence, interruption of CT to allow RC does not seem to adversely influence CT efficacy. From our results and the review of the literature we conclude that: (1) patients with disseminated SCLC that respond to CT should be given RC to decrease chest relapses. (2) A dose of 3000 rad in two weeks seems to be enough to produce a low percentage of chest relapse in disseminated SCLC, as survival of these patients is short and many will die prior to developing chest relapse. However, according to the literature, 4000-4800 rad is probably a more effective dose. (3) More studies and guidelines are needed to outline proper boundaries of radiotherapy fields, to decrease chances of peripheral chest relapses. (4) Median survival might not be a good parameter to evaluate the impact of RC in disseminated SCLC. The study of long-term survivors seems to be more important.
胸部放疗(RC)在播散性小细胞肺癌(SCLC)中的价值一直受到质疑。对西南肿瘤协作组(SWOG)的两种播散性SCLC治疗方案进行了比较。这两种方案相隔四年制定。第一种方案包括对原发肿瘤、纵隔和锁骨上区域进行放疗(RT),两周内照射3000拉德,而第二种方案则取消了任何胸部放疗。两种方案均采用多药化疗(CT)和脑部放疗。对化疗无反应者被排除在研究之外。我们的主要研究结果如下:(1)当不进行胸部放疗时,初始胸部复发(无初始胸外复发的患者)从24%增加到55%(P = 0.0001)。第二种方案中的总体胸部复发率(加上那些在胸部和其他部位同时复发的患者)为73%。(2)对化疗的反应程度不影响复发几率。即使是化疗完全缓解者,胸部复发的几率也很高。(3)未进行胸部放疗时的复发部位主要在原发肿瘤、同侧肺门和纵隔。(4)进行胸部放疗时,复发转移至胸部外周,主要是放疗野外的肺和胸膜。(5)两种截然不同的化疗方案产生了相似的缓解率和缓解持续时间。(6)采用定期再诱导的化疗方案比持续维持的方案延长了缓解持续时间和生存期。因此,中断化疗以进行胸部放疗似乎不会对化疗疗效产生不利影响。根据我们的研究结果和文献综述,我们得出以下结论:(1)对化疗有反应的播散性SCLC患者应接受胸部放疗以减少胸部复发。(2)两周内3000拉德的剂量似乎足以使播散性SCLC的胸部复发率降低,因为这些患者生存期较短,许多人会在发生胸部复发之前死亡。然而,根据文献,4000 - 4800拉德可能是更有效的剂量。(3)需要更多的研究和指南来明确放疗野的合适边界,以降低胸部外周复发的几率。(4)中位生存期可能不是评估胸部放疗对播散性SCLC影响的良好参数。对长期生存者的研究似乎更为重要。