Marino Mariacatia, Casale Rossella, Borghini Raffaele, Di Nardi Sara, Donato Giuseppe, Angeloni Antonio, Moscaritolo Salvatore, Grasso Lorenza, Mazzarella Giuseppe, Di Tola Marco, Rossi Mauro, Picarelli Antonio
Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Int Immunopharmacol. 2017 Jun;47:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
Celiac disease (CD) treatment requires a gluten-free diet (GFD), although alternative approaches have been proposed. Modification of gliadin peptides using microbial transglutaminase (mTG) inhibits their ability to induce immune response in vitro. Our aim was to evaluate the safety of mTG-modified wheat flour ingestion in CD patients. Twenty-one CD patients in remission were randomized to receive mTG-modified (n=11) or unmodified (n=10) wheat flour rusks, in double-blind fashion. Monthly, patients completed a symptom questionnaire. Serum anti-tTG, EMA and creatinine levels were monitored. At baseline and after 90days, serum anti-actin antibodies (AAA) were measured and upper endoscopy was performed. Data were analyzed by non-parametric tests. 7/11 patients eating modified rusks and 7/10 patients receiving unmodified rusks completed the study. At baseline, all patients showed negative serum anti-tTG and EMA results. At the end, 2/7 (28.6%) patients ingesting modified and 4/7 (57.1%) patients taking unmodified rusks presented positive serum anti-tTG and EMA results. Creatinine results were unmodified. Moreover, 1/7 (14.3%) patients ingesting modified and 4/7 (57.1%) patients taking unmodified rusks presented villous atrophy. In patients who received unmodified rusks, the AAA levels increased significantly and duodenal anti-tTG levels appeared higher than those measured in patients who ate modified rusks. Abdominal swelling, bloating and nausea were more severe in patients ingesting unmodified rusks than those taking modified rusks. Our results may support larger clinical trials to confirm the enzymatic treatment of wheat flour as an alternative to GFD. Clinicaltrials.gov registration no: NCT02472119.
乳糜泻(CD)的治疗需要无麸质饮食(GFD),尽管也有人提出了其他方法。使用微生物转谷氨酰胺酶(mTG)修饰麦醇溶蛋白肽可抑制其在体外诱导免疫反应的能力。我们的目的是评估CD患者摄入mTG修饰的小麦粉的安全性。21名处于缓解期的CD患者被随机分为两组,以双盲方式分别接受mTG修饰的(n = 11)或未修饰的(n = 10)小麦粉面包干。患者每月填写一份症状问卷。监测血清抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶(anti-tTG)、抗肌内膜抗体(EMA)和肌酐水平。在基线期和90天后,检测血清抗肌动蛋白抗体(AAA)并进行上消化道内镜检查。数据采用非参数检验进行分析。11名食用修饰面包干的患者中有7名和10名接受未修饰面包干的患者中有7名完成了研究。基线时,所有患者的血清anti-tTG和EMA结果均为阴性。结束时,食用修饰面包干的患者中有2/7(28.6%)、食用未修饰面包干的患者中有4/7(57.1%)的血清anti-tTG和EMA结果呈阳性。肌酐结果无变化。此外,食用修饰面包干的患者中有1/7(14.3%)、食用未修饰面包干的患者中有4/7(57.1%)出现绒毛萎缩。在接受未修饰面包干的患者中,AAA水平显著升高,十二指肠anti-tTG水平似乎高于食用修饰面包干的患者。食用未修饰面包干的患者腹部肿胀、腹胀和恶心比食用修饰面包干的患者更严重。我们的结果可能支持开展更大规模的临床试验,以证实小麦粉的酶处理可作为GFD的替代方法。Clinicaltrials.gov注册号:NCT02472119。