Burdon Catriona A, Tagami Kyoko, Park Joonhee, Caldwell Joanne N, Taylor Nigel A S
Centre for Human and Applied Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Centre for Human and Applied Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
J Therm Biol. 2017 Apr;65:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
In this experiment, hand and forearm vasomotor activity was investigated during localised, but stable heating and cooling of the face, hand and thigh, under open-loop (clamped) conditions. It was hypothesised that facial stimulation would provoke the most potent vascular changes. Nine individuals participated in two normothermic trials (mean body temperature clamp: 36.6°C; water-perfused suit and climate chamber) and two mildly hyperthermic trials (37.9°C). Localised heating (+5°C) and cooling (-5°C) stimuli were applied to equal surface areas of the face, hand and thigh (perfusion patches: 15min), while contralateral forearm or hand blood flows (venous-occlusion plethysmography) were measured (separate trials). Thermal sensation and discomfort votes were recorded before and during each thermal stimulation. When hyperthermic, local heating induced more sensitive vascular responses, with the combined thermosensitivity of both limb segments averaging 0.011mL·100mL·min·mmHg·°C, and 0.005mL·100mL·min·mmHg·°C during localised cooling (P<0.05). Inter-site comparisons among the stimulated sites yielded minimal evidence of variations in local thermal sensation, and no differences were observed for vascular conductance (P>0.05). Therefore, regional differences in vasomotor and sensory sensitivity appeared not to exist. When combined with previous observations of sudomotor sensitivity, it seems that, during mild heating and cooling, regional representations within the somatosensory cortex may not translate into meaningful differences in thermal sensation or the central integration of thermoafferent signals. It was concluded that inter-site variations in the cutaneous thermosensitivity of these thermolytic effectors have minimal physiological significance over the ranges investigated thus far.
在本实验中,在开环(钳制)条件下,对面部、手部和大腿进行局部但稳定的加热和冷却时,研究了手部和前臂的血管舒缩活动。假设面部刺激会引发最显著的血管变化。九名受试者参与了两项正常体温试验(平均体温钳制:36.6°C;水灌注服和气候舱)和两项轻度高温试验(37.9°C)。将局部加热(+5°C)和冷却(-5°C)刺激施加于面部、手部和大腿的等表面积区域(灌注贴片:15分钟),同时测量对侧前臂或手部血流(静脉阻塞体积描记法)(单独试验)。在每次热刺激之前和期间记录热感觉和不适评分。高温时,局部加热引起更敏感的血管反应,两个肢体节段的综合热敏感性在局部冷却期间平均为0.011mL·100mL·min·mmHg·°C,局部加热期间为0.005mL·100mL·min·mmHg·°C(P<0.05)。受刺激部位之间的部位间比较显示局部热感觉变化的证据极少,血管传导率未观察到差异(P>0.05)。因此,血管舒缩和感觉敏感性的区域差异似乎不存在。结合先前对汗腺运动敏感性的观察结果,似乎在轻度加热和冷却期间,体感皮层内的区域表征可能不会转化为热感觉或热传入信号的中枢整合方面的有意义差异。得出的结论是,在迄今为止研究的范围内,这些热解效应器的皮肤热敏感性的部位间变化具有最小的生理意义。