Krenn V T, Liebisch M, Kölbel B, Renz N, Gehrke T, Huber M, Krukemeyer M G, Trampuz A, Resch H, Krenn V
ZHZMD-Trier, Berlin, Germany; Sigmund Freud PrivatUniversität, Berlin, Germany.
Sigmund Freud PrivatUniversität, Berlin, Germany.
Pathol Res Pract. 2017 May;213(5):541-547. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
The aim of the work was to validate the CD15 focus score for the infection pathology of periprosthetic joint infection in a large group and to clarify whether a stratification into low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens is possible by means of the CD15 focus score (quantification of CD15 positive granulocytes).
The histopathology of 275 synovial tissue samples taken intraoperatively during revision operations (n=127 hip, n=141 knee, n=2 shoulder, n=5 ankle) was evaluated according to the SLIM consensus classification (SLIM=synovial-like interface membrane). Neutrophilic granulocytes (NG) were quantified by the CD15 focus score on the basis of the principle of focal maximum infiltration (focus) with evaluation of one field of vision (about 0.3mm). The quantification values were compared with the microbiological diagnoses taking into consideration the virulence groups of low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens and mixed infection.
The patients with positive microbiological findings (n=160) had significantly (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney U test) higher CD15 focus score values than patients with negative microbiological findings (n=115), the cut-off value being 39 cells per high power field (HPF). The CD15 focus score values of low-virulence microbial pathogens (n=94) were significantly lower (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney U test) than the values of high-virulence microbial pathogens (n=55), the cut-off value being 106 cells per HPF. Based on the microbiological diagnosis the sensitivity with respect to a microbial infection is 0.91, the specificity 0.92 (PPV=0.94; NPV=0.88; accuracy: 0.92; AUC=0.95). Based on the differentiation of the CD15 focus score values between low-virulence and high-virulence microbes the sensitivity is 0.70 and the specificity 0.77 (PPV=0.63; NPV=0.81; accuracy=0.74; AUC=0.74).
As a result of the high sensitivity and specificity, the easy to use CD15 focus score is a diagnostically valid score for microbial periprosthetic infection. A differentiation between low-virulence and high-virulence microorganism of sufficiently high diagnostic quality is additionally possible as a result of the defined quantification of CD15 positive granulocytes (the CD15 focus score) histopathological diagnosis of microbial infections is possible, which on the one hand supports the microbiological diagnosis and on the other hand by the stratification into low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens could represent an additional basis for a pathogen-specific antibiotic treatment in the event of unclear constellations of findings.
本研究旨在验证大量人群中假体周围关节感染的CD15聚焦评分在感染病理学中的应用,并明确是否可以通过CD15聚焦评分(CD15阳性粒细胞的定量)将微生物病原体分为低毒力和高毒力两类。
根据SLIM共识分类(SLIM = 滑膜样界面膜)对275例翻修手术中术中采集的滑膜组织样本(n = 127例髋关节,n = 141例膝关节,n = 2例肩关节,n = 5例踝关节)的组织病理学进行评估。根据局灶最大浸润(聚焦)原则,通过CD15聚焦评分对中性粒细胞(NG)进行定量,评估一个视野(约0.3mm)。将定量值与微生物诊断结果进行比较,同时考虑低毒力和高毒力微生物病原体的毒力组以及混合感染情况。
微生物学检查结果为阳性的患者(n = 160)的CD15聚焦评分值显著高于微生物学检查结果为阴性的患者(n = 115)(p < 0.001,Mann-Whitney U检验),截断值为每高倍视野39个细胞(HPF)。低毒力微生物病原体(n = 9�)的CD15聚焦评分值显著低于高毒力微生物病原体(n = 55)(p < 0.001,Mann-Whitney U检验),截断值为每HPF 106个细胞。基于微生物学诊断,对微生物感染的敏感性为0.91,特异性为0.92(PPV = 0.94;NPV = 0.88;准确性:0.92;AUC = 0.95)。基于CD15聚焦评分值在低毒力和高毒力微生物之间的区分,敏感性为0.70,特异性为0.77(PPV = 0.63;NPV = 0.81;准确性 = 0.74;AUC = 0.74)。
由于具有高敏感性和特异性,易于使用的CD15聚焦评分是微生物假体周围感染的有效诊断评分。此外,通过对CD15阳性粒细胞进行明确的定量(CD15聚焦评分),可以对低毒力和高毒力微生物进行具有足够高诊断质量的区分,从而有可能对微生物感染进行组织病理学诊断,这一方面支持微生物学诊断,另一方面在检查结果不明确的情况下,通过将微生物病原体分为低毒力和高毒力两类,可为针对病原体的抗生素治疗提供额外依据。