• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CD15聚焦评分在人工关节周围感染二期翻修术中的诊断价值:诊断感染清除的高特异性。

Diagnostic value of the CD 15 focus score in two-stage revision arthroplasty of periprosthetic joint infections : High specificity in diagnosing infect eradication.

作者信息

Liewen C, Krenn V T, Dieckmann R, Bause L, Liebisch M, Niemeier A, Trampuz A, Krenn V

机构信息

MVZ-Zentrum für Histologie, Zytologie und Molekulare Diagnostik Trier GmbH, Max-Planck-Straße 5, 54296, Trier, Germany.

Fakultät für Medizin, Sigmund Freud PrivatUniversität Wien, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Z Rheumatol. 2022 May;81(4):342-351. doi: 10.1007/s00393-020-00941-w. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00393-020-00941-w
PMID:33306153
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to use the CD15 focus score (FS) to determine the sensitivity and specificity of bacterial infection persistence in spacer-based two-stage revision arthroplasty.

METHODS

The analysis comprises 112 cases that were subjected to revision due to the presence of infection upon replacement of a joint endoprosthesis. The histopathological data were collected in accordance with the synovial-like interface membrane (SLIM) classification and the CD15-FS and correlated with the microbiological data (MD). The quantifying evaluation of the CD15-FS was performed without knowledge regarding the microbiological data (MD). Correlation with the MD was performed after a 14-day cultivation period.

RESULTS

With a single evaluation (1 focus, field area: 1.2 mm2) with a score value of 42, the CD15-FS showed a sensitivity for the eradication of infections of 0.64 and a specificity of 0.79 (PPV = 0.5; NPV = 0.87). With tenfold evaluation (10 foci, field area: 12 mm2) with a score value of 220, the sensitivity for the eradication was 0.68, the specificity 0.91 (PPV = 0.7; NPV = 0.89). No statistically significant correlation between the score values and the different infectious species could be detected. Based on the MD in 112 cases the rate of infection eradication was 75%. Polymethylmethacrylate-particles (PMMA) were detected in the perispacertissue in 64 cases (58%). No significant correlation could be established between microbiological pathogen detection and the presence of PMMA.

CONCLUSION

In all cases (n = 112), periimplant synovial tissue (SLIM) with variable fibroblastic cellularity, capillary proliferation, leukocytic infiltration, fibrin deposition, new formation of woven bone and detection of PMMA particles was observed. These cases were classified as type IX perispacer synovialis/SLIM: type IX‑A with histopathological infection eradication and type IX‑B with histopathological infection persistence.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在使用CD15聚焦评分(FS)来确定基于间隔器的两阶段翻修关节成形术中细菌感染持续存在的敏感性和特异性。

方法

分析包括112例因关节假体置换时存在感染而接受翻修的病例。根据滑膜样界面膜(SLIM)分类收集组织病理学数据以及CD15-FS,并与微生物学数据(MD)相关联。CD15-FS的定量评估在不了解微生物学数据(MD)的情况下进行。在14天培养期后进行与MD的相关性分析。

结果

单次评估(1个病灶,视野面积:1.2 mm2),评分为42时,CD15-FS显示感染根除的敏感性为0.64,特异性为0.79(阳性预测值=0.5;阴性预测值=0.87)。十次评估(10个病灶,视野面积:12 mm2),评分为220时,根除的敏感性为0.68,特异性为0.91(阳性预测值=0.7;阴性预测值=0.89)。未检测到评分值与不同感染菌种之间存在统计学显著相关性。基于112例病例的MD,感染根除率为75%。在64例(58%)的间隔周围组织中检测到聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯颗粒(PMMA)。微生物病原体检测与PMMA的存在之间未建立显著相关性。

结论

在所有病例(n = 112)中,观察到植入物周围滑膜组织(SLIM)具有可变的成纤维细胞密度、毛细血管增生、白细胞浸润、纤维蛋白沉积、编织骨新形成以及PMMA颗粒的检测。这些病例被分类为IX型间隔周围滑膜炎/SLIM:IX-A型为组织病理学上感染根除,IX-B型为组织病理学上感染持续存在。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic value of the CD 15 focus score in two-stage revision arthroplasty of periprosthetic joint infections : High specificity in diagnosing infect eradication.CD15聚焦评分在人工关节周围感染二期翻修术中的诊断价值:诊断感染清除的高特异性。
Z Rheumatol. 2022 May;81(4):342-351. doi: 10.1007/s00393-020-00941-w. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
2
CD15 focus score: Infection diagnosis and stratification into low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens in periprosthetic joint infection.CD15聚焦评分:人工关节周围感染的感染诊断及低毒力和高毒力微生物病原体分层
Pathol Res Pract. 2017 May;213(5):541-547. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
3
Synovial aspiration and serological testing in two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection: evaluation before reconstruction with a mean follow-up of twenty seven months.人工关节感染两阶段翻修术中的滑膜抽吸和血清学检测:重建前评估,平均随访27个月。
Int Orthop. 2018 Feb;42(2):265-271. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3700-2. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Alpha-Defensin Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Diseases.针对炎性疾病患者人工关节置换术后感染,α-防御素检测的诊断准确性。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1767-1771. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
5
[CD15 focus score for diagnostics of periprosthetic joint infections : Neutrophilic granulocytes quantification mode and the development of morphometric software (CD15 quantifier)].用于诊断人工关节周围感染的CD15聚焦评分:中性粒细胞定量模式及形态计量软件(CD15定量仪)的开发
Z Rheumatol. 2015 Sep;74(7):622-30. doi: 10.1007/s00393-015-1571-8.
6
Three to six tissue specimens for histopathological analysis are most accurate for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection.对于诊断人工关节周围感染,三到六个组织标本进行组织病理学分析最为准确。
Bone Joint J. 2023 Feb;105-B(2):158-165. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B2.BJJ-2022-0859.R1.
7
What Is the Optimal Criteria to Use for Detecting Periprosthetic Joint Infections Before Total Joint Arthroplasty?在全膝关节置换术前,用于检测假体周围关节感染的最佳标准是什么?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S201-S204. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.072. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
8
Inadequacy of Joint Aspiration for Detection of Persistent Periprosthetic Infection During Two-Stage Septic Revision Knee Surgery.两阶段感染性膝关节翻修手术中关节穿刺抽吸在检测持续性假体周围感染方面的不足
Orthopedics. 2017 Jul 1;40(4):231-234. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20170411-04. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
9
Two-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections: What is the value of cultures and white cell count in synovial fluid and CRP in serum before second stage reimplantation?人工关节周围感染的两阶段翻修关节成形术:二期再植入前,滑膜液培养、白细胞计数及血清C反应蛋白的价值是什么?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Apr;136(4):447-52. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2404-6. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
10
Analysis of synovial biomarkers with a multiplex protein microarray in patients with PJI undergoing revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee joint.采用多重蛋白质微阵列分析髋关节或膝关节翻修术治疗 PJI 患者的滑液生物标志物。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Dec;140(12):1883-1890. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03388-5. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
[Pathologies of joint endoprostheses : Histopathological diagnostics for endoprosthetic centers].[关节假体病理学:假体中心的组织病理学诊断]
Pathologie (Heidelb). 2025 Jan 29. doi: 10.1007/s00292-024-01410-w.
2
Identifying potential predictive indicators for reimplantation timing in two-stage revision: a meta-analysis and system review.两阶段翻修术中再植入时机潜在预测指标的识别:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 23;145(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05689-5.
3
[Particle disease and its effects on periarticular tissue].

本文引用的文献

1
Twenty common errors in the diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.20 种常见的人工关节置换术后感染诊治错误。
Int Orthop. 2020 Jan;44(1):3-14. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04426-7. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
2
Periprosthetic joint infection: current concepts and outlook.人工关节周围感染:当前概念与展望
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jul 29;4(7):482-494. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180092. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
High cure rate of periprosthetic hip joint infection with multidisciplinary team approach using standardized two-stage exchange.
[颗粒性疾病及其对关节周围组织的影响]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 Mar;52(3):196-205. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04348-8. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
4
[Histopathological diagnostics of arthrofibrosis].[关节纤维性变的组织病理学诊断]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Nov;125(11):862-867. doi: 10.1007/s00113-022-01239-z. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
采用标准化两阶段置换的多学科团队方法治疗人工髋关节周围感染的治愈率高。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Mar 13;14(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1122-0.
4
Hip and Knee Section, Diagnosis, Laboratory Tests: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections.髋膝关节部分、诊断、实验室检查:骨科感染国际共识会议论文集
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2S):S351-S359. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
5
Hip and Knee Section, Diagnosis, Reimplantation: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections.髋膝关节部分、诊断、再植入:骨科感染国际共识会议论文集
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2S):S369-S379. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
6
Diagnostic guidelines for the histological particle algorithm in the periprosthetic neo-synovial tissue.假体周围新滑膜组织中组织学颗粒算法的诊断指南。
BMC Clin Pathol. 2018 Aug 25;18:7. doi: 10.1186/s12907-018-0074-3. eCollection 2018.
7
The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria.2018 年人工髋关节和膝关节感染定义:基于循证和验证的标准。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1309-1314.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
8
Diagnostic Utility of Histological Analysis for Detecting Ongoing Infection During Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis.组织学分析在炎性关节炎患者二期翻修关节成形术中检测持续性感染的诊断效用
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S219-S223. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.021. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
9
CD15 focus score: Infection diagnosis and stratification into low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens in periprosthetic joint infection.CD15聚焦评分:人工关节周围感染的感染诊断及低毒力和高毒力微生物病原体分层
Pathol Res Pract. 2017 May;213(5):541-547. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
10
Periprosthetic Infection Recurrence After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty: Failure or Fate?两阶段翻修关节置换术后假体周围感染复发:是失败还是必然?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):526-531. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 24.