Jang Shih-Jung, Chou Hsin-Hua, Juang Jyh-Ming Jimmy, Hsieh Chien-An, Duan De-Min, Huang Hsuan-Li, Ko Yu-Lin
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation.
School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University.
Circ J. 2017 Jun 23;81(7):993-998. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0025. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
To compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing repeated drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment for femoropopliteal (FP) DCB restenosis with those of patients without repetition-DCB.
From March 2013 to September 2014, 102 patients (118 affected legs) underwent DCB for symptomatic FP disease; 47 patients had restenosis, and 37 underwent reintervention over a 45-month follow-up. We compared the outcomes of repetition-DCB for DCB restenosis with those of patients without repetition. The baseline patient and lesion characteristics were similar between groups. The mean lesion length was 200.8±113.1 and 195.2±134.6 mm, P=0.894, respectively. In addition, the procedural and follow-up outcomes were not different. The rates of freedom from binary restenosis (70% vs. 14%, P=0.001) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) (78% vs. 38%, P=0.026) at 1 year were statistically different between groups. Cox regression analysis showed that repetition of DCB was the only predictor for freedom from binary restenosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60 to 23.6, P=0.008) and CD-TLR (HR: 5.37, 95% CI 1.32-22.0, P=0.019).
For FP DCB restenosis, repetition of DCB can potentially improve vessel patency and significantly reduce the need for reintervention compared with conventional treatment. However, these observations require further confirmation in larger scale studies.
比较接受重复药物涂层球囊(DCB)治疗股腘动脉(FP)DCB再狭窄患者与未接受重复DCB治疗患者的临床结局。
2013年3月至2014年9月,102例患者(118条患腿)因有症状的FP疾病接受DCB治疗;47例患者出现再狭窄,其中37例在45个月的随访期间接受了再次干预。我们比较了DCB再狭窄患者重复DCB治疗的结局与未重复治疗患者的结局。两组患者的基线特征和病变特征相似。平均病变长度分别为200.8±113.1和195.2±134.6mm,P = 0.894。此外,手术和随访结局并无差异。两组在1年时的二元再狭窄无事件发生率(70%对14%,P = 0.001)和临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(CD-TLR)率(78%对38%,P = 0.026)有统计学差异。Cox回归分析显示,重复DCB是二元再狭窄无事件发生(风险比[HR]:6.15,95%置信区间[CI] 1.60至23.6,P = 0.008)和CD-TLR(HR:5.37,95% CI 1.32 - 22.0,P = 0.019)的唯一预测因素。
对于FP DCB再狭窄,与传统治疗相比,重复DCB可能改善血管通畅性并显著减少再次干预的需求。然而,这些观察结果需要在更大规模的研究中进一步证实。