• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂冠状动脉病变患者血管内超声引导下药物洗脱支架植入的结局:15项临床试验和8084例患者的综合荟萃分析

The outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation among patients with complex coronary lesions: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 15 clinical trials and 8,084 patients.

作者信息

Fan Zhong Guo, Gao Xiao Fei, Li Xiao Bo, Shao Ming Xue, Gao Ya Li, Chen Shao Liang, Tian Nai Liang

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital Nanjing Medical University; Nanjing-People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Anatol J Cardiol. 2017 Apr;17(4):258-268. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7461. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

DOI:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7461
PMID:28344214
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5469105/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The effects of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with complex coronary artery lesions remains to be controversial. This study sought to evaluate the outcomes of IVUS guidance in these patients.

METHODS

The EMBASE, Medline, and other internet sources were searched for relevant articles. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and target-vessel revascularization (TVR). The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) was analyzed as the safety endpoint.

RESULTS

Fifteen clinical trials involving 8.084 patients were analyzed. MACE risk was significantly decreased following IVUS-guided DES implantation compared with coronary angiography (CAG) guidance (odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.53-0.73, p<0.001), which might mainly result from the lower all-cause mortality risk (OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.40-0.67, p<0.001), MI (OR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56-0.86, p=0.001), and TVR (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.70, p<0.001). The subgroup analyses indicated better outcomes of IVUS guidance in DES implantation for these patients with left main disease or bifurcation lesions.

CONCLUSION

IVUS guidance in DES implantation is associated with a significant reduction in MACE risk in patients with complex lesions, particularly those with left main disease or bifurcation lesions. More large and powerful randomized trials are still warranted to guide stenting decision making.

摘要

目的

血管内超声(IVUS)引导下药物洗脱支架(DES)植入术在复杂冠状动脉病变患者中的疗效仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估IVUS引导在这些患者中的治疗效果。

方法

检索EMBASE、Medline及其他网络资源以查找相关文章。主要终点为主要不良心脏事件(MACE),包括全因死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)和靶血管血运重建(TVR)。将明确/可能的支架血栓形成(ST)发生率作为安全性终点进行分析。

结果

分析了15项涉及8084例患者的临床试验。与冠状动脉造影(CAG)引导相比,IVUS引导下DES植入术后MACE风险显著降低(优势比[OR]0.63,95%置信区间[CI]:0.53 - 0.73,p<0.001),这可能主要源于全因死亡率风险较低(OR 0.52,95% CI:0.40 - 0.67,p<0.001)、MI(OR 0.70,95% CI:0.56 - 0.86,p = 0.001)和TVR(OR 0.53,95% CI:0.40 - 0.70,p<0.001)。亚组分析表明,对于左主干病变或分叉病变患者,IVUS引导下DES植入术的效果更佳。

结论

IVUS引导下DES植入术可显著降低复杂病变患者的MACE风险,尤其是左主干病变或分叉病变患者。仍需要更多大型、有力的随机试验来指导支架置入决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edb/5469105/60b4759db204/AJC-17-258-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edb/5469105/e240363acf53/AJC-17-258-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edb/5469105/60b4759db204/AJC-17-258-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edb/5469105/e240363acf53/AJC-17-258-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edb/5469105/60b4759db204/AJC-17-258-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation among patients with complex coronary lesions: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 15 clinical trials and 8,084 patients.复杂冠状动脉病变患者血管内超声引导下药物洗脱支架植入的结局:15项临床试验和8084例患者的综合荟萃分析
Anatol J Cardiol. 2017 Apr;17(4):258-268. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7461. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
2
Intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.复杂冠状动脉病变中血管内超声引导与血管造影引导下药物洗脱支架植入术:随机试验的荟萃分析
Am Heart J. 2017 Mar;185:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
3
The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.血管成像在常规经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用:金属裸支架和药物洗脱支架试验的荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 Dec;33(6):360-6. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12160.
4
Intravascular ultrasound guidance reduces cardiac death and coronary revascularization in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation: results from a meta-analysis of 9 randomized trials and 4724 patients.血管内超声引导可降低接受药物洗脱支架植入术患者的心脏死亡和冠状动脉血运重建率:9项随机试验和4724例患者的荟萃分析结果
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;35(2):239-247. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01555-3. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
5
Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: The ULTIMATE Trial.血管内超声与血管造影指导药物洗脱支架置入术:ULTIMATE 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 18;72(24):3126-3137. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
6
Effects of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Meta-Analysis With Individual Patient-Level Data From 2,345 Randomized Patients.血管内超声指导与血管造影指导新一代药物洗脱支架置入术的效果:来自 2345 名随机患者个体患者水平数据的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2232-2239. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
7
Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with unstable angina and complex coronary artery true bifurcation lesions.血管内超声引导下药物洗脱支架植入术与不稳定型心绞痛和复杂冠状动脉真性分叉病变患者临床预后的改善相关。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;34(11):1685-1696. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1393-2. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
8
Comparison of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a meta-analysis of one randomised trial and ten observational studies involving 19,619 patients.血管内超声与血管造影指导药物洗脱支架置入术的比较:一项随机试验和十项观察性研究的荟萃分析,涉及 19619 例患者。
EuroIntervention. 2012 Nov 22;8(7):855-65. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I7A129.
9
Meta-analysis and systematic review of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug eluting stent implantation in left main coronary disease in 4592 patients.对4592例左主干冠状动脉疾病患者进行血管内超声与血管造影引导下药物洗脱支架植入术的Meta分析和系统评价。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Jun 14;18(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0843-z.
10
Intravascular ultrasound-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents to improve outcome: a meta-analysis.血管内超声指导下药物洗脱支架置入术改善预后的Meta 分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar;7(3):233-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.013. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.血管内超声引导与血管造影引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自观察性研究和随机对照试验的证据。
US Cardiol. 2020 May 4;14:e03. doi: 10.15420/usc.2020.03. eCollection 2020.
2
Intravascular Imaging for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance and Optimization: The Evidence for Improved Patient Outcomes.用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指导与优化的血管内成像:改善患者预后的证据
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Aug 5;1(6):100413. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100413. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of intravascular ultrasound guided versus angiography guided drug eluting stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管内超声引导与血管造影引导下药物洗脱支架植入术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 Nov 17;15:153. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0144-8.
2
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: The IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial.血管内超声指导与血管造影指导依维莫司洗脱支架置入的效果:IVUS-XPL 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Nov 24;314(20):2155-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15454.
3
Clinical Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention With Zotarolimus-Eluting Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Randomized Study.
The long-term clinical outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided coronary drug eluting stent implantation in long coronary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
血管内超声引导与血管造影引导下冠状动脉药物洗脱支架植入治疗长冠状动脉病变的长期临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 4;9:944143. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.944143. eCollection 2022.
4
Efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.血管内影像学指导下药物洗脱支架置入术的疗效:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Jul 23;22(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02772-w.
5
Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗分叉病变。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Jul 22;18(4):e273-e291. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01065.
6
Short- and Long-Term Prognosis of Intravascular Ultrasound-Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis Involving 24,783 Patients.血管内超声与血管造影指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的短期和长期预后:一项涉及 24783 例患者的荟萃分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Oct 15;2021:6082581. doi: 10.1155/2021/6082581. eCollection 2021.
7
Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with complex coronary lesions: An updated meta-analysis of nine randomized clinical trials.血管内超声与血管造影引导下药物洗脱支架植入治疗复杂冠状动脉病变患者:九项随机临床试验的最新荟萃分析
Anatol J Cardiol. 2019 Sep;22(4):160-167. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2019.86598.
8
Intravascular ultrasound guidance reduces cardiac death and coronary revascularization in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation: results from a meta-analysis of 9 randomized trials and 4724 patients.血管内超声引导可降低接受药物洗脱支架植入术患者的心脏死亡和冠状动脉血运重建率:9项随机试验和4724例患者的荟萃分析结果
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;35(2):239-247. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01555-3. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesions: A single-center randomized trial.血管内超声引导下药物洗脱支架植入术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉病变患者:一项单中心随机试验。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2019 Feb;21(2):83-90. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.21447.
10
Operator Experience and Outcomes After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的术者经验与结果。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018 Mar 23;20(5):29. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-0972-0.
血管内超声引导下佐他莫司洗脱支架与生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架植入治疗慢性完全闭塞病变的临床影响:随机研究
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(7):e002592. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002592.
4
Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions.根据血管直径,血管内超声和光学相干断层扫描在识别功能性显著冠状动脉狭窄方面的准确性:对2581例患者和2807处病变的荟萃分析。
Am Heart J. 2015 May;169(5):663-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
5
Angiographic and clinical comparisons of intravascular ultrasound- versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with chronic total occlusion lesions: two-year results from a randomised AIR-CTO study.血管内超声与血管造影引导下药物洗脱支架植入治疗慢性完全闭塞病变患者的血管造影和临床比较:随机AIR-CTO研究的两年结果
EuroIntervention. 2015 Apr;10(12):1409-17. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I12A245.
6
Comparison of inhospital mortality, length of hospitalization, costs, and vascular complications of percutaneous coronary interventions guided by ultrasound versus angiography.超声引导与血管造影引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的住院死亡率、住院时间、费用及血管并发症比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 15;115(10):1357-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.037. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
7
Comparison of one-year clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents for left main lesions: a single-center analysis of a 1,016-patient cohort.血管内超声引导与血管造影引导下药物洗脱支架植入治疗左主干病变的一年临床结果比较:一项对1016例患者队列的单中心分析
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Sep 23;8:1299-309. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S65768. eCollection 2014.
8
2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):2354-94. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000133. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
9
2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization.2014年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南。
EuroIntervention. 2015 Jan;10(9):1024-94. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M09_01.
10
Usefulness of intravascular ultrasound guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents for chronic total occlusions (from the Multicenter Korean-Chronic Total Occlusion Registry).血管内超声指导在第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全闭塞病变中的应用(来自多中心韩国慢性完全闭塞注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):534-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 6.