Yao Chu K, Tuck Caroline J, Barrett Jacqueline S, Canale Kim Ek, Philpott Hamish L, Gibson Peter R
Department of Gastroenterology, Monash University and Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Australia.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Mar;5(2):284-292. doi: 10.1177/2050640616657978. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
Limited data are available regarding the reproducibility of lactulose and fructose breath testing for clinical application in functional bowel disorders.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of lactulose and fructose breath hydrogen testing and assess symptom response to fructose testing.
Results were analysed from 21 patients with functional bowel disorder with lactulose breath tests and 30 with fructose breath tests who completed another test >2 weeks later. Oro-caecal transit time, hydrogen responses, both qualitatively (positive/negative) and quantitatively (area under the curve (AUC) for hydrogen), were compared between tests. In another 36 patients, data scores for overall abdominal symptoms, abdominal pain, bloating, wind, nausea and fatigue were collected during the fructose test and compared to hydrogen responses.
No correlations were found for lactulose AUC (linear regression, = 0.58) or transit time (Spearman's = 0.54) between tests. A significant proportion (30%) lost the presence of fructose malabsorption ( < 0.01). Hydrogen AUC for fructose did not correlate between tests, ( = 0.28, = 0.17) independent of time between testing ( = 0.82). Whilst patients with fructose malabsorption were more likely to report symptoms than those without (56% vs 17%; = 0.04), changes in symptom severity were not different ( > 0.05).
Routine use of lactulose and fructose breath tests in functional bowel disorder patients is not supported due to its poor reproducibility and low predictive value for symptom responses.
关于乳果糖和果糖呼气试验在功能性肠病临床应用中的可重复性,现有数据有限。
本研究旨在调查乳果糖和果糖呼气氢试验的可重复性,并评估对果糖试验的症状反应。
分析了21例进行乳果糖呼气试验的功能性肠病患者和30例进行果糖呼气试验的患者的结果,这些患者在2周后完成了另一项试验。比较了两次试验之间的口盲肠转运时间、氢反应,包括定性(阳性/阴性)和定量(氢曲线下面积(AUC))。在另外36例患者中,收集了果糖试验期间总体腹部症状、腹痛、腹胀、肠胃气胀、恶心和疲劳的数据评分,并与氢反应进行比较。
两次试验之间,乳果糖AUC(线性回归,r = 0.58)或转运时间(Spearman秩相关系数,r = 0.54)均无相关性。相当一部分(30%)患者失去了果糖吸收不良的表现(P < 0.01)。果糖的氢AUC在两次试验之间不相关(r = 0.28,P = 0.17),且与两次试验之间的时间无关(r = 0.82)。虽然果糖吸收不良的患者比没有吸收不良的患者更有可能报告症状(56%对17%;P = 0.04),但症状严重程度的变化并无差异(P > 0.05)。
由于可重复性差且对症状反应的预测价值低,不支持在功能性肠病患者中常规使用乳果糖和果糖呼气试验。