Human Molecular Genetics Research Group, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23 St., Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tartu, Puusepa St. 8, Tartu 51014, Estonia.
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 27;7:45327. doi: 10.1038/srep45327.
We have previously shown an extensive load of somatic copy number variations (CNVs) in the human placental genome with the highest fraction detected in normal term pregnancies. Hereby, we hypothesized that insufficient promotion of CNVs may impair placental development and lead to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). RPL affects ~3% of couples aiming at childbirth and idiopathic RPL represents ~50% of cases. We analysed placental and parental CNV profiles of idiopathic RPL trios (mother-father-placenta) and duos (mother-placenta). Consistent with the hypothesis, the placental genomes of RPL cases exhibited 2-fold less CNVs compared to uncomplicated 1 trimester pregnancies (P = 0.02). This difference mainly arose from lower number of duplications. Overall, 1 trimester control placentas shared only 5.3% of identified CNV regions with RPL cases, whereas the respective fraction with term placentas was 35.1% (P = 1.1 × 10). Disruption of the genes NUP98 (embryonic stem cell development) and MTRR (folate metabolism) was detected exclusively in RPL placentas, potentially indicative to novel loci implicated in RPL. Interestingly, genes with higher overall expression were prone to deletions (>3-fold higher median expression compared to genes unaffected by CNVs, P = 6.69 × 10). Additionally, large pericentromeric and subtelomeric CNVs in parental genomes emerged as a risk factor for RPL.
我们之前已经在人类胎盘基因组中发现了大量的体细胞拷贝数变异(CNVs),其中在正常足月妊娠中检测到的变异比例最高。因此,我们假设 CNVs 促进不足可能会损害胎盘发育,导致复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)。RPL 影响了约 3%的生育夫妇,而特发性 RPL 占病例的 50%左右。我们分析了特发性 RPL 三(母亲-父亲-胎盘)和二(母亲-胎盘)对的胎盘和父母 CNV 谱。与假设一致,RPL 病例的胎盘基因组中的 CNVs 数量比无并发症的 1 期妊娠少 2 倍(P=0.02)。这种差异主要是由于重复序列的数量减少引起的。总的来说,1 期对照胎盘与 RPL 病例仅共享 5.3%的已识别 CNV 区域,而与足月胎盘的相应比例为 35.1%(P=1.1×10)。NUP98(胚胎干细胞发育)和 MTRR(叶酸代谢)基因的破坏仅在 RPL 胎盘上检测到,这可能表明新的基因座与 RPL 有关。有趣的是,整体表达较高的基因更容易发生缺失(与不受 CNVs 影响的基因相比,中位表达高出 3 倍以上,P=6.69×10)。此外,父母基因组中的大着丝粒和亚端粒 CNVs 也成为 RPL 的一个风险因素。