Suppr超能文献

疗养院居民补充维生素D:随机单剂量胆钙化醇负荷方案与个体化负荷剂量方案的比较

Vitamin D Supplementation in Nursing Home Residents: Randomized Single Cholecalciferol Loading Protocol vs. Individualized Loading Dose Regimen.

作者信息

Delomas C, Hertzog M, Vogel T, Lang P O

机构信息

Lang Pierre-Olivier, Geriatric medicine and Geriatric rehabilitation division, Department of medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Chemin de Mont Paisible 16, MP16/04/414, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland, E-Mail: Pierre

出版信息

J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(4):421-428. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0788-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of a single cholecalciferol loading protocol in nursing home (NH) residents taking no VitD supplementation at regular basis.

DESIGN

Randomized single-blind controlled study.

SETTING

One NH.

PARTICIPANTS

All residents.

INTERVENTION

From March 21st to May 19th, 2015, NH residents were randomly assigned to either 4x100'000IU to be taken every 2 weeks (treatment group) or an individualized regimen according to baseline 25(OH)VitD level (control group).

MEASUREMENTS

25(OH)VitD, calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, alkaline phosphatase, and creatinine serum levels were centrally measured at day 7 after the last dose in both groups, and at baseline in the control group.

RESULTS

111 residents (mean age 85.1±6.7 years) were randomized to the treatment (N=53) or the control group (N=58). No significant difference in terms of demographic characteristics, risk for osteoporosis, and past history of VitD supplementation was measured. At baseline, 37.9%, 25.5% and 5.2% were respectively sub-optimal, insufficient, and deficient for VitD. Whatever the study group, at the 7th day after the last dose of cholecalciferol, 100% of residents reached serum values ≥20ng/mL (p value for non-inferiority <0.001 and p value for superiority p=1.00) and 93.6 vs. 88.2% reached values ≥30ng/mL in the treatment and control group respectively (p value for non-inferiority <0.01 and p value for superiority p=0.48). While mean value was higher in the treatment group (50.2±615.4 vs. 35.8±66.5ng/mL; p<0.0001), none of participants have seen their value >150 ng/mL. Not any biological adverse effects was measured.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed that a single loading protocol is at least as effective and safe as tailored regimen in terms of the ability to rapidly normalize 25(OH)VitD values. The often required dosage of 25(OH)VitD is reasonably not necessary to initiate VitD supplementation protocol in this vulnerable population.

摘要

目的

评估单次服用胆钙化醇方案对未定期补充维生素D的养老院居民的疗效和安全性。

设计

随机单盲对照研究。

地点

一家养老院。

参与者

所有居民。

干预措施

2015年3月21日至5月19日,将养老院居民随机分为两组,一组每2周服用4×100000IU(治疗组),另一组根据基线25(OH)维生素D水平采用个体化方案(对照组)。

测量指标

两组在最后一剂用药后第7天集中测量血清25(OH)维生素D、钙、磷、甲状旁腺激素、碱性磷酸酶和肌酐水平,对照组在基线时测量。

结果

111名居民(平均年龄85.1±6.7岁)被随机分为治疗组(N = 53)或对照组(N = 58)。在人口统计学特征、骨质疏松风险和维生素D补充史方面未发现显著差异。基线时,维生素D水平欠佳、不足和缺乏的居民分别占37.9%、25.5%和5.2%。无论研究组如何,在最后一剂胆钙化醇用药后第7天,100%的居民血清值≥20ng/mL(非劣效性p值<0.001,优效性p值=1.00),治疗组和对照组分别有93.6%和88.2%的居民血清值≥30ng/mL(非劣效性p值<0.01,优效性p值=0.48)。虽然治疗组的平均值较高(50.2±615.4 vs. 35.8±66.5ng/mL;p<0.0001),但没有参与者的血清值>150ng/mL。未检测到任何生物学不良反应。

结论

本研究证实,在使25(OH)维生素D值迅速恢复正常的能力方面,单次负荷方案至少与个体化方案一样有效和安全。在这一脆弱人群中启动维生素D补充方案时,通常所需的25(OH)维生素D剂量并非合理必要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验