Suppr超能文献

单一认证体系下家庭医学项目主任对整骨疗法住院医师的态度

Attitudes of Family Medicine Program Directors Toward Osteopathic Residents Under the Single Accreditation System.

作者信息

Hempstead Laura K, Shaffer Todd D, Williams Karen B, Arnold Lt Col James

出版信息

J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;117(4):216-224. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2017.039.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Between 2015 and 2020, residency programs accredited through the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) are preparing the single graduate medical education (GME) system through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME).

OBJECTIVES

(1) To assess the attitudes of family medicine program directors in programs accredited dually by the AOA and ACGME (AOA/ACGME) or ACGME only toward the clinical and academic preparedness of osteopathic residency candidates and (2) to determine program director attitudes toward the perceived value of osteopathic-focused education, including osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) curricula.

METHODS

A survey was sent to program directors of AOA/ACGME and ACGME-only accredited family medicine residency programs. Items concerned program directors' perception of the academic and clinical strength of osteopathic residents at the onset of residency, the presence of osteopathic faculty and residents currently in the program, and the presence of formal curricula for teaching OMT. The perceived value of osteopathic focus was obtained through a composite score of 5 items.

RESULTS

A total of 38 AOA/ACGME family medicine residency program directors (17%) and 211 ACGME family medicine residency program directors (45.6%) completed the survey (N=249). No difference was found in the ranking of the perceived clinical preparation of osteopathic residents vs allopathic residents in programs with and without OMT curricula (P=.054). Directors of programs with OMT curricula perceived the academic preparation of their osteopathic residents vs allopathic residents more highly than those without OMT curricula (P=.039). Directors of AOA/ACGME programs perceived both the academic preparation and clinical preparation of their osteopathic residents more highly than those at ACGME-only programs (P=.004 and P=.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Directors of AOA/ACGME programs, as well as those whose programs have an osteopathic focus in curricular offerings, were more likely to rank the academic preparation of osteopathic residents higher than directors of ACGME-only programs and those without OMT curricula. Further research is needed to determine the value of osteopathic recognition in attracting strong family medicine residency candidates.

摘要

背景

2015年至2020年间,通过美国骨病协会(AOA)认证的住院医师培训项目正通过毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)筹备单一的毕业后医学教育(GME)系统。

目的

(1)评估由AOA和ACGME双重认证(AOA/ACGME)或仅由ACGME认证的家庭医学住院医师培训项目主任对骨病住院医师候选人临床和学术准备情况的态度,以及(2)确定项目主任对以骨病为重点的教育(包括骨病手法治疗(OMT)课程)的感知价值的态度。

方法

向AOA/ACGME和仅由ACGME认证的家庭医学住院医师培训项目的主任发送了一份调查问卷。问题涉及项目主任对住院医师培训开始时骨病住院医师学术和临床能力的看法、项目中目前骨病教员和住院医师的情况,以及OMT教学的正式课程情况。通过对5个项目的综合评分获得对骨病重点的感知价值。

结果

共有38名AOA/ACGME家庭医学住院医师培训项目主任(17%)和211名仅由ACGME认证的家庭医学住院医师培训项目主任(45.6%)完成了调查(N = 249)。在有和没有OMT课程的项目中,骨病住院医师与西医住院医师在感知临床准备方面的排名没有差异(P = 0.054)。有OMT课程的项目主任认为其骨病住院医师的学术准备比西医住院医师更高,高于没有OMT课程的项目主任(P = 0.039)。AOA/ACGME项目的主任认为其骨病住院医师的学术准备和临床准备都比仅由ACGME认证的项目主任更高(分别为P = 0.004和P = 0.002)。

结论

AOA/ACGME项目的主任以及课程以骨病为重点的项目主任,比仅由ACGME认证的项目主任和没有OMT课程的项目主任更有可能将骨病住院医师的学术准备排名更高。需要进一步研究以确定骨病认可在吸引优秀家庭医学住院医师候选人方面的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验