Kurokawa Shun
Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Oiwake-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan; Key Lab of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Science, Datun Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 100101, PR China.
J Theor Biol. 2017 May 21;421:16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
The existence of cooperation is a mysterious phenomenon and demands explanation, and direct reciprocity is one key potential explanation for the evolution of cooperation. Direct reciprocity allows cooperation to evolve for cooperators who switch their behavior on the basis of information about the opponent's behavior. Here, relevant to direct reciprocity is information deficiency. When the opponent's last move is unknown, how should players behave? One possibility is to choose cooperation with some default probability without using any further information. In fact, our previous paper (Kurokawa, 2016a) examined this strategy. However, there might be beneficial information other than the opponent's last move. A subsequent study of ours (Kurokawa, 2017) examined the strategy which uses the own last move when the opponent's last move is unknown, and revealed that referring to the own move and trying to imitate it when information is absent is beneficial. Is there any other beneficial information else? How about strong belief (i.e., have infinite memory and believe that the opponent's behavior is unchanged)? Here, we examine the evolution of strategies with strong belief. Analyzing the repeated prisoner's dilemma game and using evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) analysis against an invasion by unconditional defectors, we find the strategy with strong belief is more likely to evolve than the strategy which does not use information other than the opponent player's last move and more likely to evolve than the strategy which uses not only the opponent player's last move but also the own last move. Strong belief produces the extended reciprocity and facilitates the evolution of cooperation. Additionally, we consider the two strategies game between strategies with strong belief and any strategy, and we consider the four strategies game in which unconditional cooperators, unconditional defectors, pessimistic reciprocators with strong belief, and optimistic reciprocators with strong belief are present.
合作的存在是一种神秘现象,需要作出解释,而直接互惠是合作进化的一个关键潜在解释。直接互惠使基于对手行为信息而改变自身行为的合作者之间的合作得以进化。在此,与直接互惠相关的是信息不足。当对手的上一步行动未知时,玩家应如何行动?一种可能性是在不使用任何进一步信息的情况下以某种默认概率选择合作。事实上,我们之前的论文(黑川,2016a)研究了这种策略。然而,除了对手的上一步行动之外,可能还有有益信息。我们随后的一项研究(黑川,2017)考察了在对手上一步行动未知时使用自身上一步行动的策略,并揭示了在信息缺失时参考自身行动并尝试模仿它是有益的。还有其他有益信息吗?坚定信念(即拥有无限记忆并相信对手行为不变)如何?在此,我们考察具有坚定信念的策略的进化。通过分析重复囚徒困境博弈,并使用进化稳定策略(ESS)分析来对抗无条件背叛者的入侵,我们发现具有坚定信念的策略比不使用对手上一步行动之外信息的策略更有可能进化,并且比不仅使用对手上一步行动还使用自身上一步行动的策略更有可能进化。坚定信念产生了扩展的互惠,并促进了合作的进化。此外,我们考虑具有坚定信念的策略与任何策略之间的双策略博弈,以及存在无条件合作者、无条件背叛者、具有坚定信念的悲观互惠者和具有坚定信念的乐观互惠者的四策略博弈。